StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Constitutional Conventions. Should Conventions Be Made Into Laws - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
An informal procedural agreement that is followed by the institution of a state is known as constitutional convention. The countries and states of the world whose political system is derived from the British Constitutional Law follow the constitutional conventions …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.4% of users find it useful
Constitutional Conventions. Should Conventions Be Made Into Laws
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Constitutional Conventions. Should Conventions Be Made Into Laws"

?An informal procedural agreement that is followed by the of a is known as constitutional convention. The countries and s of the world whose political system is derived from the British Constitutional Law follow the constitutional conventions for the functions of the government. These are the nations which follow the Westminster system of government, common in the Commonwealth Nations. The constitutional conventions often distribute the powers between the head of the state and the head of the government making the head of the state a ceremonial post. For example in the Indian subcontinent (Present India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh) the constitution is based on the Govt. of India Act 1935 which was formulated by the British legislators, the additions to the act are made in the form of constitutional conventions and the affairs of government in these states are being run by these constitutional conventions. There are other constitutional conventions which operate alongside written constitutions. In Britain there are many constitutional conventions which have been made into laws. Still there is a marked difference between Laws and Constitutional Conventions. According to Dicey [1883] laws are the set of rules which are enforced by the courts while constitutional conventions are those set of rules which are not actually enforced by the courts and are merely are the habits and practices of people in certain offices of the state. According to Hood Phillips “constitutional conventions are rules of practices which are regarded as binding by those to whom they apply but which are not laws because they are not enforced by the courts and parliament”. L.B. Curzon has regarded the constitutional conventions as understandings which are results of long practices which are adopted in the absence of formal rules while Freeman classifies constitutional conventions as a code of political maxims which are universally acknowledged and universally practiced and according to Peter Hogg constitutional conventions are non-legal rules. The basic purpose behind the constitutional conventions is to bring about change without the formal channel of legislation. This is actually done by keeping the constitution in touch and at the same time accommodating the growth of the ideas which occurs by the passage of time through the activities of government. The traditions and practices which are followed by certain governmental procedurals over large periods of time are considered as informal rules and are made constitutional conventions. According to one perception the English constitution drifted from the monarchical system to parliamentary system by way of constitutional convention. The ultimate object of most of the conventions is that the affairs of public interest should be conducted in accordance with the wishes of the majority of the electorates. The origin of constitutional conventions also takes place when certain authorities try to exercise power which is actually not prohibited by law but a certain opposition is aroused against that exercise of power and the opposition is of such an extent that the same action cannot be taken in future and the opposition marks an end to that practice. In such a scenario the certain practices which are not actually forbidden by law becomes forbidden under the constitutional conventions. Constitutional conventions automatically assume the role of constitutional amendments as the legislators and the government starts following them. But the constitutional conventions are not enforced by the courts of law because sometimes these are in conflict with the legal rules and the courts are bound to enforce the legal rules and not the constitutional conventions. On an occasion the British Supreme court has ruled out the possibility of the constitutional conventions to be enforced as laws no matter how well-established and universally accepted they may be because there are instances when there is clash between the constitutional convention and a present law. The only way these can be enforced legally is after they have been enacted by the parliament or legislature as constitutional amendment after codifying the convention. Some conventions evolve or change over time however conventions are rarely ever broken. Since the constitutional conventions are not legal bindings and no legal action can be taken against someone who breaches a convention but such a person is often very heavily criticized and there is general sentiment of disgrace and disrespect against that very person. Thus constitutional conventions are set of rules which are followed as traditions and due to universal understanding on certain things by the legislators and politicians and these conventions ultimately acquire the force of customs which cannot be removed. Constitutional conventions are unwritten constitution which can be more precisely described as unwritten understandings and customs which surround the rules of constitutional behavior, although these conventions are not supported by law but still these are considered as bindings. Constitutional conventions must be judged by their ability to fulfill their proclaimed function. According to Dicey conventions secure the ultimate supremacy of the electorate as the true political sovereign of the state and are rules for determining the mode in which the discretionary powers of the crown ought to be exercised. The discretionary power of the crown, arising out of the royal prerogative, statue and common law are exercised on behalf of the electorate due to convention. If we discuss the case of Britain, all the crown powers are now being exercised by ministers and cabinet members. Constitutional conventions provide a genuine control of the exercise of such discretionary powers. Constitutional Conventions are rules of political practice which are regarded as binding by those whom they apply. Since ministers are accountable to Parliament on behalf of the people then it is true to say that the lack of legal control of constitutional conventions provide a role for the Parliament as the controller of the executive. Some constitutional conventions are far more important than most of the statutory and common law rules, if we connect it to the British system of government. Some of the constitutional conventions on ministerial responsibility have ultimately proved to be effective as demonstrated by the resignations of Peter Mandelson and Estelle Moris in the Blair’s government. So we can easily find examples from recent history where constitutional conventions have played very useful role in accountability of ministers and creating a sense of responsibility among them. Constitutional conventions make the legal constitution work; they keep in touch with the growth of ideas. Laws are present but there are certain aspects of governmental rule and in execution of affairs of state which are not very clearly defined by the laws. Laws provide an outline to follow which acts as general instructions in case of governmental affairs while constitutional conventions can be considered as detailed plan to run the affairs of the state and this plan has been carved out by experience and universal agreement of politicians and legislators. Conventions exist to control the discretionary and arbitrary powers of the crown however this is probably too narrow since some conventions do not relate to the powers of crown while the fundamental laws do adhere to the powers of crown. Constitutional conventions are normally based on agreements while other are based on the usage. It can be stated that every significant act within the political circle can assume the form of a constitutional convention. The exact dates of origin of constitutional conventions is very difficult to find out because they evolve from various traditions which are based on incidents and gradually takes a final form. Nothing can be said about the evolution period of a constitutional convention. It took 70 years for the establishment of the convention that the Queen must act upon the advice of her ministers. There are other traditions which became conventions very early like the sitting of prime minister in the commons etc. Constitutional conventions are generally traditions and habits but there is a marked difference between a convention and a habit or tradition. As stated earlier, the person who breaches a convention is deemed as disrespectful by the people, there is a reason behind this practice. Conventions are not made on their own, conventions take time to evolve and in addition to this conventions are mutually agreed upon by politicians, leaders and legislators of high prestige and honor. Therefore conventions are not mere habits but there are actual reasons behind following a constitutional convention which are beyond the tradition and efficaciousness of the incident. Conventions are not a product of legislative or judicial process; these are in fact rules of political practice and largely derived from customs and formal enactment which are recognized as binding among those persons who constitute a community or state. Conventions are followed by people because they want to follow them while laws are followed because people are bound to follow them. If the electorate is sovereign, then the content of the law is challengeable by the electorate who could support a party proposing the changes in law. People obey the law because there is a contract between the governor and the governed. In this contract the general people submit to the central authority in exchange to security. The conventions of the constitution develop consensually between those subject to them. The laws and conventions develop through consensus; those subject to them must abide by them. People obey the conventions more eagerly then they obey laws, but at the end of the day laws do not give you an option while conventions do. It can be said that a law is obeyed because there is a sanction against those that do not obey the law however there is also a social and moral binding associated with it. Society usually isolates the law breaker from itself while this behavior is stronger in case of a convention because conventions are more of moral nature than constitutional. Conventions are also obeyed because a breach of the rules would ultimately lead to a breach of the law. The breach of conventions results in conflicts and there is no legal remedy to such a situation since conventions are not enforced by rule of law. So the validity of the conventions cannot be the subject of proceedings in a court of law. Reparation for breach of such rules will not be affected by any legal sanction. Conventions are constitutional rules which are not laws in the strict sense however these are obeyed because a breach of the rules ultimately leads to the breach of law. So as most of the constitutional conventions have become very important and the new ones will become important at the end of the day therefore the conventions should be made into laws because the breach of constitutional conventions lead to the breach of laws. Moreover when conventions are not followed this often leads to conflicts and since constitutional conventions are not enforced by courts there is no proper legal remedy of such conflicts, such situations can be avoided by giving the conventions the status of laws. And since the constitutional conventions are universally accepted and established and there is a general consensus on them therefore there is no difficulty or hurdle to make them into laws and these should be made into laws. Reference List Phillips O. H., (1962) Constitutional and Administrative Law, Sweet and Maxwell Marshall G. (1984) Constitutional Conventions: the rules and forms of political accountability, Oxford University Press Dicey A. V. (2000) Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, Elibron Barnett H. (2002) ) Constitutional and Administrative Law, Routledge Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Constitutional Conventions. Should Conventions Be Made Into Laws Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1410976-ypwhat-are-constitutional-conventions-should
(Constitutional Conventions. Should Conventions Be Made Into Laws Essay)
https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1410976-ypwhat-are-constitutional-conventions-should.
“Constitutional Conventions. Should Conventions Be Made Into Laws Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1410976-ypwhat-are-constitutional-conventions-should.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Constitutional Conventions. Should Conventions Be Made Into Laws

The Importance of Constitutional Conventions to the Working of the UK Constitution

The importance of ‘constitutional conventions' to the working of the UK Constitution Name: University: Course: Tutor: Date: Introduction The UK Constitution is critical to system of government and provides the rules that govern the country.... constitutional conventions are uncodified and informal agreements followed by State institutions.... Thesis statement: constitutional conventions provide the flesh that clothes the dry bones of the law; they make the legal constitution work; and keep in touch with advancement in ideas....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

The British Has A Constitution

Common / Case Law: The British constitution is “judge made”and derives some of its principles from jurisprudence.... “Codified constitutions are largely written, centered around a single document incorporating key constitutional provisions that are binding on all political institutions.... Statute Law: Many Acts of Parliament concern constitutional law....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Constitutional Law of the UK

But the case remains that the constitution relies far more on unwritten constitutional conventions than virtually every other liberal democratic constitution.... Regardless of whether a country possesses an unwritten1 or a written constitution, constitutional conventions usually play an important role in regulating constitutional relationships among different branches of government.... A common definition of constitutional conventions is: "By convention is meant a binding rule, a rule of behavior accepted as obligatory by those concerned in the working of the constitution....
5 Pages (1250 words) Term Paper

What Is a Constitutional Convention and Its Purpose

seeks to analyze and discuss preposition that “constitutional conventions should be put on a legal footing.... rdquo; Hoar (1917) described a constitution as “a social compact, by which the whole people covenants with each citizen, and each citizen with the whole people, that all shall be governed by certain laws for the common good.... This paper "What Is a constitutional Convention and Its Purpose?... rdquo;… A constitutional convention is one designated by the people in their sovereign to capacity to make, alter, change of modifying the constitution of a state (Hoar, R....
8 Pages (2000 words) Coursework

Australia Constitution vs the UK Constitution

The paper "Australia Constitution vs the UK Constitution" discusses constitutional conventions, the difference between convention, practices, and laws of both states, the necessity of crown's approving the bills passed from the parliament, speaker's neutrality, the appointment of the members of the court of appeal, consultation with the opposition.... In other words, constitutional conventions play an imperative role in the political development and growth of institutions within a state or country....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

Conventions of Constitutional and Administrative Law in the United Kingdom

constitutional conventions therefore are considered as the tools through which flexibility can be achieved in constitution without actually going through a process of legislation.... Hood Philips defines conventions as “ʺRules of political practice, which are regarded as binding, by those to whom they apply, but which are not laws because they are not enforced by the courts and parliament”.... Philips outlines conventions as rules of political practice which are also not laws and therefore not enforced by the courts as well as the parliament....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Purpose and Effects of Section 4 of Human Rights Act

S 4 grants certain courts the right to determine whether primary or subordinate laws are compatible to convention rights or not and to subsequently declare them incompatible if so found.... In the case of primary laws, the right simply accrues upon a finding of incompatibility but in the case of secondary laws, there must be a determination of incompatibility in addition to the requirement that the primary legislation relevant to it prevents its removal....
13 Pages (3250 words) Assignment

Constitution Convention in the UK

hellip; The author explains that constitutional conventions originate in the case where there is no regulation to prohibit the practice of a given type of power may bring rise to opposition inhibiting future similar occasion.... constitutional conventions originate in the case where there is no regulation to prohibit the practice of a given type of power may bring rise to opposition inhibiting future similar occasion.... Though these conventions regulate the conduct of ministries and sovereign power; they cannot be termed as actual laws....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us