StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The Origin of the Trust Law - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
This essay "The Origin of the Trust Law" focuses on Trust which is considered to be a peculiar system of law that finds its origin in English law. Trust is found in the United States of America, New Zealand, Australia, Canada, India, and other Commonwealth countries. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.4% of users find it useful
The Origin of the Trust Law
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "The Origin of the Trust Law"

? THE TRUST LAW The Trust is considered to be a peculiar system of law that finds its origin in the English law. Trust is found in USA, New Zealand, Australia, Canada, India and other Commonwealth countries. It is not an indigenous part of the civil code jurisdiction of Europe or any other place that falls under the Napoleonic Civil Code or the German Civil Code. The modern form of Trust law originates from Anglo centric legal system because it is the product of English History. If the idea of the trust law is developed in the Middle East then quasi charitable purpose will be provided within the family in the form of “waqf”. If it is developed in the country where monarchy system is followed, then monks would be required to live in the property. Therefore it may be concluded that it is not necessary that the idea of Trust Law will always find its origin in the English system only1. In this paper different aspects of the contemporary trust law will be studied and the importance of the beneficiary in this law would be discussed. The Origin of the trust law The historical origin of the trust can be found in the so called crusades in which the English noblemen fought and were away from England for years. The noblemen were significant land-owners in England under the feudal land system. The problem arose as to who would be using the land and in what way when the noble men were out of the country. As a consequence the rule of equity recognized that the land left unused by the noblemen, who were unable to exercise their legal rights on the other, will be used by other men. So the equity recognized an arrangement where the right of the noblemen will be retained. The nobleman was regarded as the person who will have the ultimate beneficial right and the person who will be benefiting from this arrangement is known as beneficiary. In the absence of the nobleman, the Stewart who accepts the charge of the land is entitled to raise taxes on the land and so on. So in such an arrangement the nobleman passes their legal rights of the land to the trusted person referred as “trustee” but the ultimate beneficial right of the property remains with the nobleman who serves as the “beneficiary”. The core duty of the trustee is to stick to the terms and condition of the trust2.Therefore the “beneficiary” is referred to have the “equitable interest “in the property3. A major traditional practitioner’s Lewin gave the following description of trust. He defined trust as “a duty or aggregated accumulation of obligations that rest upon the person described as trustee. The responsibility bestowed on him is due to the property held by him under his control. The property is compelled by the court in the equitable jurisdiction to administer in the manner lawfully prescribed by the trust instrument or where there be no specific provision written or oral, or to the extent of such provision is invalid or lacking in accordance with equitable principle”4. Problem with the Law In California, people presented petitions and pleaded for justice to the Chancellor (the keeper of the King’s conscience) stating that the property given to the trustee for their benefit was mis-applied. So the court of Chancery built up two ideas: first, “the obligation of the feoffee to uses or trustee to hold the property for the benefit of the cestui que use or beneficiary”5 and second, “the right of the beneficiary to obtain the use of the property”6. Thus this notion backed that the trustee’s obligation with regard to the property was correlative to the beneficiaries’ right in it7. A major traditional practitioner Lewin argued that the consequence is such that the benefits and the advantages accrued will not go to the trustee and in turn will go to the person called “cestui que” that is the beneficiary. The trustee may be the beneficiary in the case where the advantage accrued will be in his favor to the extent of his beneficial interest8. Importance of Beneficiary The central tension in the Trust Law is regarding the right of the trustee and the beneficiary. The settler who establishes the terms in the trust is bestowed with the power to decide up to which extent the beneficiaries have the equitable interest, and the extent of control the trustee has in case of trust administration. The organizing principle of the law of donatives transfer says that “donor’s or settler’s intention is given effect to maximum extent allowed by the law”9. But the position of the beneficiary also claims supremacy. It is the beneficiary who only has the ownership interest and not the settler10. The rule in the case of Saunder v Vautier in1841 gives the beneficiary the right to instruct the trustee to transfer property to them absolutely. They can exercise this power only if they hold between them the entirety of the equitable interest and if they are all legally competent to act. The rule of Sauders v Vantier demonstrates one particular important facet of right of a beneficiary: the beneficiaries under a trust have proprietary rights in the trust fund and not merely personal rights against the trustee11. The spendthrift clause states that “No interest of a beneficiary in the principal or income of this trust may be anticipated, assigned or encumbered, or subjected to any creditor’s claim or legal process prior to its actual distribution to the beneficiaries”12. Hence a more detailed clause may require the trustee to pay a certain amount of his principal income directly for the benefit of the beneficiary and not upon any written or oral direction or assignment of the beneficiary. Even if the beneficiary is prohibited by the trust from transferring the interest, the beneficiary may direct the trustee to distribute the interest of the trust to another person. In such a case the direction given by the beneficiary is recognized as the revocable authorization to pay13. “The duty of loyalty in the Trust Law” requires the trustee, the administrator of the trust to safeguard the importance of the beneficiary. “The sole interest rule is regarded as the most fundamental rule in the trust law”14. This rule prohibits the trustee to place himself in such a position where his personal interest conflicts with the personal interest of the beneficiary15. The beneficiary can seek information from the trustee regarding what can be done with the principle income of the trust. Sometimes even the trustee has to pay a certain amount of the income to the beneficiary. The most important aspect of the trust is that the beneficiary is provided with the most important and integral part of the trust structure. Though the beneficiary did not take part in the establishment or in the administration of the trust but to safeguard the benefits, trust and the well being of the beneficiary, the beneficiary was empowered with many responsibilities. The key responsibilities include understanding the vision of the trust, actively participating in its affair, understanding the right and responsibilities, understanding the investment fundamentals, understanding the role and responsibility of the trustee and having a clear view of the trust accounting16. Case Saunder v Vautier In this case a testator by his will bestows a certain amount of East India stock to his executors and trustee. The interest and dividends that get accumulated to the trust will be transferred to his great nephew, Daniel Vautier after reaching the age of 25 years. He was supposed to get the principle amount of the stock along with the interest and dividend accrued. The testator died in 1832 and Daniel in 1841 attained the age of 21 years, which means he was an adult. Now he claimed the stock and the accrued dividend and interest stating that he was going to marry and start his own business. It was held by Lord Cottenham, L.C. that the gift has to be transfer on the death of the testator and not when Daniel attains the age of 25 years. Thus he terminates the whole; trust must end before it was intended by the testator17. The rule is not confined to only gifts by persons but also to the gifts to a specific charity. The rule although seems to empower the beneficiary with the power to terminate the direction of accumulation but it does not stop there, it opens into a much wider direction18. Kingsnorth Finance Co Ltd v Tizard In this case the husband and wife jointly hold a matrimonial home on trust. After getting divorced the wife did not want to stay with her husband. However she came to that house to look after her child. One day in her absence, he signed a mortgage with a mortgagee and absconded with the money. The husband was the sole guarantee. The court ordered that the “equitable right of the wife bound the mortgagee”19. The inspection done by the mortgagee was insufficient and was affixed by constructive notice20. Conclusion The basic thought behind the trust is to enjoy the management and ownership divided between the two parties. The fragmentation and the ownership are enjoyable only when the property is vested to the trustee. However since the trusted is ready to hold the legal title for the benefits of the beneficiary so they are bound by equity that allocates an equitable interest to the beneficiary. References 1. Angus Patricia M. TEN FACTS EVERY TRUST BENEFICIARY SHOULD KNOW. (Private Health Management, 2003, pp. 48-50) < http://www.angusadvisorygroup.com/pdfs/families_resources/10_Facts.pdf> accessed 23 January 2013 2. Gallanis Thomas P., The New Direction of American Trust Law. IOWA Law Review. [2011]. Vol 97 3. Hudson, A. Undertanding Euity and Trust (Routledge 2012) 4. Langbein, John H., Questioning the Trust-Law Duty of Loyalty: Sole Interest or Best Interest?. Faculty Scholarship Series: The Yale Law Journal. [2005],Vol 114 5. Moffat Graham et al, Trusts Law: Text And Materials (4th edn, Cambridge University Press 2005) 6. Paul Matthews, “The New Trust: Obligations without Rights?”, In Oakley A.J., Trends in Contemporary Trust Law (Oxford University Press 1996) 7. Price John R. & Donaldson Samuel A., Price on Contemporary Estate Planning (CCH 2008) 8. Report on the rule in Sauders v. Vauntier. (Law Reform Commission, 1975) < http://www.manitobalawreform.ca/pubs/pdf/archives/18-full_report.pdf> accessed on 23 January 2013 9. The Revocation and Variation of Trusts part 2. (Law commission paper, n.d.) < http://www.lawcom.govt.nz/sites/default/files/publications/2011/05/lc2931-perpetuities-and-the-revocation-and-variation-of-trusts-review-of-the-law-of-trusts-third-trusts-issues-paper-fa-part-2-150.pdf> accessed 23 January 2013 10. THE RULE IN SAUNDERS v. VAUTIER. (INSTITUTE OF LAW RESEARCH & REFORM, 1972) < http://www.law.ualberta.ca/alri/docs/fr009.pdf> accessed 23 January 2013 11. The Trust Concept (n.d.), p. 47. accessed on 23 January 2013 Read More
Tags
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Equity and Trusts Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words - 1”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1466776-equity-and-trusts
(Equity and Trusts Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words - 1)
https://studentshare.org/law/1466776-equity-and-trusts.
“Equity and Trusts Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words - 1”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1466776-equity-and-trusts.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Origin of the Trust Law

A Long Tradition and Role of Equity in English Law

Also, the common law only recognized certain kinds of cases; for example, the common law courts did not recognize the trust deed.... The historical origin of equity in English legal system dates back to the late 13th and 14th centuries.... The paper attempts to understand the origin and development of equity as a source of law in the English legal system and analyze the significance of rules of equity and equitable doctrines and remedies in legal proceedings today....
8 Pages (2000 words) Term Paper

Equity and the Law of Trusts

The "title split" of trust law may be generalized colloquially as follows: legal title involves control, management, and possession, while equitable (beneficial) title involves "benefit," "enjoyment," and "use.... ifferences between Equity and Trust LawsTo understand how the laws of equity were derived from the trust laws of the English court system, it is important to define each.... (Wikipedia: Equity) Trust laws were derived from this definition of equity system of law governance and are described asIn common law legal systems, a trust is a relationship in which a person or entity (the trustee) holds legal title to certain property (the trust property or trust corpus) but is bound by a fiduciary duty to exercise that legal control for the benefit of one or more individuals or organizations (the beneficiary), who hold "beneficial" or "equitable" title....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

The Fundamental Differences between Equity and Trusts

Equity governs the trust law in such a sense and applies to a wide range of situations and cases such as family relationships, charities, pensioners etc.... The courts deal with the formalities of property law and secret trusts, although trust law applies to all such situations, and understanding of trust law applies to express trusts, fixed trusts, discretionary trusts, resulting trusts, constructive trusts, charitable trusts, proprietary and personal solutions....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

Equity, Conscience, And Unjust Enrichment

He seemed to interpret this to mean on the one hand, that all remedies were available regardless of the origin of the cause of action.... The paper "Equity, Conscience, And Unjust Enrichment" discusses the main thrust of the argument for integrating the systems of equity and common law that derives from the common sense position that coherently integrating the two branches and ensure the success of the modern common law.... In a majority decision, the House of Lords in Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale v Islington London Borough Council [1996] demonstrated that the 'differences between common law ....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Essential Components of a Valid Trust

trust law applies whenever one person has placed trust and confidence in another person to manage his or her affairs.... the trust is a form of ownership that developed in England through the courts of Chancery.... The full force of the law of equity governs such relationships and the trust now provides a mechanism for a number of situations, family relationships, charities, pension funds, to name but a few.... An expression, which has been commonly used to describe the way in which equity functions is that equity ‘mitigates the rigor of the common law' so that the letter of argument not applied in such a strict way that it may cause injustice....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Key Aspects of Property Law

This paper "Key Aspects of Property law" describes aspects involved in the property law.... This paper outlines equity law, Equitable jurisdiction, the role of trusts and other branches, an express trust, resulting trust, three elements of unjust enrichment.... The following are the different aspects of learning property law: Equity law is the branch of the English law which has been developed many years ago because people in lawsuits would complain to the king about the very callous rules of the common law which were in the way of truly achieving justice....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

The Creation of Equity

Their task was to ensure that the common law, enforced in the King's name, was applied with justice in individual cases.... The author states that in the fourteenth century the common law was overly rigid and unable to provide justice in individual cases.... Particular cases of injustice arose because: juries were bribed or inhibited; juries inhibited law in civil cases because the judge had to spend a lot of time explaining the law to them....
7 Pages (1750 words) Assignment

The Main Purposes of Formality Requirements

This work called "The Main Purposes of Formality Requirements" describes the formality requirements in the law of Trusts.... An example of the conscious creation of a trust can be illustrated as follows.... The author takes into account that the three formalities prescribed under the Property Act 1925 fulfill the purposes of the prevention of fraud....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us