StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Australian Law of Contract - Assignment Example

Cite this document
Summary
This assignment "Australian Law of Contract" presents business transaction that entails the transfer of a commodity from one person to another. The transfer of commodities is effectively done with the use of a contract (The FBI, 2011)…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.4% of users find it useful
Australian Law of Contract
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Australian Law of Contract"

Australian Law of Contract By 27th September Business transaction entails the transfer of a commodity from one person to another. The transfer of commodities are effectively done with the use of a contract (The FBI , 2011). An agreement between two parties who agrees to transact goods is called a contract. The document can become valid when people involved signs the contract (Purdy, 2010). The document is a legal document and can be used before a court of law in case one of the party fails to fulfil the obligations laid down. Since it is a document that needs the parties to fulfil their obligations, it follows that there are terms and conditions that are required to be put into consideration. These calls attention from both parties to read carefully the terms and conditions before putting a sign into a contract. The scenario in question has two parties, Bonnie Hart, who owns a manufacturing firm that produces and distributes sunglasses. Bonnie sees a potential market in the seniors who are not their main target in the normal sunglasses. He opts to manufacture the total eclipse sunglass that would attract seniors. The main attracting feature of the product is the ability to protect the customers from some harmful UV lights. Bonnie takes a step further to advertise her products in the media. To attract more customers, she opts to carry out a promotion that would see some of her customers win a two weeks holiday in Paris. The scratch ticket was to be fixed in the sunglass so that there may be some lucky winners. She contacts her printer Ozzblock Pty Ltd, whom she had entrusted for the printing job. The mistake that Bonnie made was that she signed the document without reading its terms (The City Law School, 2014). The terms were as follows; 1. Ozzblock Pty Ltd, (the printer) guarantees that it will exercise reasonable care in proof-checking all materials for errors in printing prior to delivery. 2. Notwithstanding clause 7, the printer accepts no responsibility for any loss or damage howsoever caused by errors in printing resulting from faulty typesetting work by the printer or any of its employees. Considering these terms, the first one offers to do a considerable good work in proofreading any errors related to printing of the scratch cards before delivery. As a lawyer, I would have advised Bonnie to take Ozzblock to the court because the company did not fulfil its obligation as promised in the agreement. Proofreading was part of the agreement outlined by the contract. The damage is primarily a result of not doing proofreading of the contract from the Ozzblock printers. The case is the same as that of Administration of PNG v Leahy (1961) 105 CLR 6 (Business Law, 2014). In this case, there was a contract between the two parties that PNG would perform a tick eradication that had affected Leahy’s cattle. Leahy, the plaintiff, opted to move into the court after PNG failed to perform their duties as required by the law. Considering this case in relation to our case, Bonnie had an agreement with Ozzblock printers to that the vouchers used for the promotion of the product must be proofread. Since Ozzblock printers failed to proofread the cards before delivery was made, they are supposed to compensate Bonnie for the loss. The loss suffered is not only the demand for the air ticket and a sponsored holiday to Paris, but also, the long life of the company producing the sunglasses (Bryan & Vann, 2012). The customers may see Bonnie’s firm as an untrustworthy firm and therefore the company’s future prosperity be ruined. Bonnie could also base her case on the level of negligence. The terms were clear that there had to be some proofreading before the product is released to the consumers. The case could be argued out as in the case of Astley v Austrust Limited CLR 1 (2000) at an Australian court (Julie Clarke, 2000). Austrust sued Astley, who was their legal provider for negligence as she did not provide the firm with legal advice required in their operations that led to the loss. The judge found out that not only Astley was negligent of her duty but also the company neglected its duty that the lead to the loss. Therefore, it was not fair to say that Astley was guilty, and the case was overturned by a judge. Maybe argued in this was given that Bonnie had done some mistake by not reading the terms and conditions for the agreement carefully. She also attached her ten years old son to take part in the production of the tickets. The child is argued to cause a technical mistake that lead to a huge loss. The case studies given above could be used to trigger off some arguments in the court of law. The first advice to Bonnie was to use the agreement that suggested that Ozzblock had to proof read the tickets before they are released to the market. The release was done without them proofreading. Therefore, the firm is supposed to all the losses (Parkinson, 2001). Given that proofreading was the first obligation in the contract, the parties are supposed to deal with it first. The issue of exclusion from the damages will come in afterwards. The printing company does not give any option of interruption. When the ten years old child was brought to the company, he became part of the employee. He thus falls under the care of the Ozzblock even though he belongs to Bonnie. The agreement does not give any option of an alteration of the contract when another employee comes in during the proceedings of the production. The printing firm allowed Bonnie to bring in her son so that he could work with the firm and cover some cost associated with the printing of the card. Ozzblock firm could have protested this idea if they knew that the son was maybe not well trained for the job (Pearce & Geddes, 1996). Letting him go ahead with the job meant that they had some trust in him. Therefore, they needed to proofread the cards before releasing them. The investigations also showed that the child was no supervised when dealing with the machine. Ozzblock had a duty to supervise every person working in the firm. The fact that the child belonged to their customer made them neglect the child, and that brought the printing error (Kercher, 1995). Since the printing firm was eligible for any mistake that could lead to damage, they could have taken a lot of care so that the product they offered be excellent to their customer. If doing so was not good enough, they could have asked Bonnie to leave with her son since the son could cause some damages. Their failure to think in such a manner led to the damage of the cards. So, Mrs Bonnie would be correct to argue that Ozzblock acted in a manner that they did not take care of the contract. Arguing from the Ozzblock position, the company had set an issue in the agreement that Bonnie never noticed for she never read the terms correctly. The firm argues that none of them or their employees would be held responsible in case there was a damage of the commodities that were being processed by them. The Ozzblock was ready to rely on the clause in their match against Bonnie in the court. The term damage was key to the exclusion. The term could be used to mean the physical damage and the technical damage that arose because of the printing error. Since the company was also bound by the fact that it could perform a proofreading of the work before submitting, it could not rely on an exclusion clause. The Ozzblock printing company thought that they could use the exclusion clause to counter attack Bonnie outcry of the damage. The reason that the exclusion clause exist does not give them a window of defence. The exclusion clause cannot be misused as a reason for the lack of proof reading the work done (Ellinghaus & Duggan, 1989). That is if Ozzblock had proofread the errors in typing the vouchers; then any damages costs would not be on their side. Therefore, they needed to fulfil Bonnie’s instructions for the tickets before they use the second term of exclusion. The exclusion clause cannot be used as a party’s failure to analyse the agreement. There is a claim that Bonnie did not use her reading glasses, and the Ozzblock noted. Therefore, anything they did from that time was done knowing that their client never read the exclusion clause. That is why the company never gave any attention to Bonnie’s son who was working with them. They also used Bonnie’s ignorance to neglect one of their main obligation; that is, proof reading the scratch card. Therefore, they need to bear full responsibility for the loss suffered. Contract is a very serious obligation that must be carried with a lot of weight by parties involved. People are entering into a contract need to make the relationship interesting by making sure that they fulfil the necessary obligations as outlined in the document. Failure to cooperate with the agreement will only make life difficulties for the parties. In this case, Ozzblock ignored the needs of their customer Bonnie, and a loss is suffered that would certainly fall into the printing company. References Bryan, M. & Vann, V., 2012. Equity & Trusts in Australia. New York: Cambridge University Press. Business Law, 2014. BLO1105 – Business Law. [Online] Available at: www.scs.cuhk.edu.hk/vu/blo1105/2009/BLO1105%20Power%20Point%20Slides.ppt [Accessed 28 09 2009]. Ellinghaus, M. & Duggan, A., 1989. The Emergence of Australian Law. Sydney: Butterworths. Julie Clarke, 2000. Australian Contract Law. [Online] Available at: http://www.australiancontractlaw.com/cases/astley.html [Accessed 27 09 2014]. Kercher, B., 1995. An Unruly Child: A History of Law in Australia. Sydney: Allen & Unwin. Parkinson, P., 2001. Tradition and Change in Australian Law. Sydney: LBC Information Services. Pearce, D. C. & Geddes, R. S., 1996. Statutory Interpretation in Australia. Sydney: Butterworths. Purdy, M., 2010. Mike Purdy Public Contracting Blog. [Online] Available at: http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/2010/06/what-date-controls-effective-date-of.html [Accessed 27 09 2010]. The City Law School, 2014. Magazine Insight Law. [Online] Available at: http://www.insitelawmagazine.com/ch3offer.htm [Accessed 27 09 2014]. The FBI, 2011. Reports and Publications. [Online] Available at: http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/publications/financial-crimes-report-2010-2011 [Accessed 27 09 2014]. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Problem solving assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words”, n.d.)
Problem solving assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1658600-problem-solving-assignment
(Problem Solving Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
Problem Solving Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words. https://studentshare.org/law/1658600-problem-solving-assignment.
“Problem Solving Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1658600-problem-solving-assignment.
  • Cited: 1 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Australian Law of Contract

Four Step Process in Business Law

The prime legal issue observed in this case study is related to the law of contract.... The author of this paper "Four-Step Process in Business Law" will make an earnest attempt to evaluate and present constituents that are equally important for making a contract legitimate and breach of one of these factors may result in a void agreement.... The case study does not follow all the elements of a contract in an effective way.... The case study mainly highlights a contract of selling a refurbished bicycle within Australia and so it needs to conform to various rules and regulations of Australian contract Law....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Australian Business Law

The law of contract is perhaps one of the most important dimensions of the whole legal system of any country.... The law of contract, an important branch of Common Law, plays a vital role in investing legally enforceable rights in each party against the other party.... The law of contract also states the corresponding liabilities of both the parties and its impacts on both parties' legal rights as well.... This essay "Australian Business Law" presents a law-case analysis in relation to the main elements of a contract including offer, acceptance, and breach of contract, and analyzes whether a person, who entered into a contract and unknowingly breached the contents, will be legally rightful to claim....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Australian Contract Law

However, more states are supplementing the common law of contract specifically in connection with the consumer protection (Goldring, 1998).... Australian contract law Name Institution Australian contract law A contract is an agreement signed between two or more parties and that is legally enforceable.... A contract can be said to arise when a certain group makes an offer and in response, the other group makes a notification to accept it....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Australian Contract Law

The first contract stipulates, among others, the construction of an oil refinery by Big Oil Ltd in Portland, the.... The second contract, on the other hand, stipulates, among others, a concession of 50% Council rates in Subsequently however, Big Oil Ltd transferred its ownership to an associated company, Best Oil Ltd, in which it has 40% interest and the Portland Council reacted by withdrawing the 50% concession earlier agreed.... nder the law, only the parties to a contract have the right to enforce its terms and be conferred a right or be obligated under it....
8 Pages (2000 words) Research Paper

Contract Law: Steven V Susan

This essay, Contract Law: Steven V Susan, declares that the legal tussle here is on breach of contract between the buyer and the seller in relation to the Australian Law of Contract....  The legal tussle here is on breach of contract between the buyer and the seller in relation to the Australian Law of Contract.... The various legal issues that come into play in this problem are invitation to treat; intention to create legal relations between the buyer and seller; offer; counter offer; consideration; revocation of offer; postal acceptance rule; domestic or family arrangements; breach of contract; and finally the vagueness of terms of offer or contract (Radan, et al....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

The Differences between Australian Contract Law and Brazilian Contract Law

The most salient distinction between Brazilian and Australian contract law is the doctrine of freedom of contract.... While Brazilian law, like Australian law, indorses the duty to act in good faith and honesty with respect to contractual relations, the doctrine of freedom of contract under Brazilian law is subject to constraints.... The new Brazilian Civil Code 2003, mandates that the freedom of contract shall be based on and constrained by the 'social function of the contract'....
7 Pages (1750 words) Term Paper

Contract Law between India and Australia

The author compares the contract law existing in India and Australia and concludes that both contract laws stress the importance of the mental health of both the parties at the time of signing the documents.... Both the parties should have the required mental health to interpret the terms and conditions of the contract before signing it.... Moreover, both the countries prohibit minors from signing a contract.... Persons who sign a contract on behalf of minors should take the responsibility of any consequences occurring from the contract....
11 Pages (2750 words) Term Paper

Comparing Australian Contract Law vs British Contract Law

Through the research developed on this subject, it has been proved that the forms of contract law in the two countries are similar.... Many differentiations exist in regard to the contract law of the Common Law countries – compared to the Civil Law ones.... However, differentiations have been identified between the above two systems of law; this trend is clearer in the case-law of both countries.... It should be noted, that another important element of the australian law is the high importance given to the good faith as a term for developing contractual agreements....
7 Pages (1750 words) Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us