StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The Specific Rules of Law - Case Study Example

Summary
From the paper "The Specific Rules of Law" it is clear that generally, the argument of Josh about changing his mind, the discovery of the actual market value of the car and his relationship with Matt come at a time when they cannot stand their ground in law…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.2% of users find it useful
The Specific Rules of Law
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "The Specific Rules of Law"

Case Study: Law Number May 6, Faculty CASE STUDY: LAW Q1. Utilising the process of 4 steps, evaluate whether the intention andconsideration elements have been satisfied in the scenario. Step 1: The Legal Issue As a fundamental principle of law, for any valid contract to be entered into between two parties, the elements of intention and consideration in a formal contract must be satisfied (Radan & Gooley, 2010). The element of intention in a contract agreement must have the dimension that confirms the intent of legally binding agreement by the offeror. In response to the offer, the offeree must confirm their willingness and commitment to accepting the terms of the offer by way of a consideration in exchange for the sacrifice made by the offeror. Josh is the offeror while Matt is the offeree. The existence of a legally binding intention is evident in Joshs proposal to sell his car to Matt. The $5000 quoted price for the car for which Josh intends to exchange his car is a consideration in the context of the case in question. Step 2: The Specific Rules of Law For a legally binding contract to prevail, there must be a demonstration of the intention by the parties involved to enter into the contract (Radan & Gooley, 2010). The judgement on whether intention exists should be done objectively from a reasonable person’s viewpoint on whether the intent of the agreement to be binding is observable. The presumption of the law stipulates that in a situation where a commercial relationship exists between the parties to an agreement, there is an intent by the parties to create a legally binding contract. The further provision states that where a purely domestic or social relationship exists between the parties to the agreement, the law presumes that the parties have no intention of creating a legally binding contract. The law of contract stipulates that consideration in an agreement represents an exchange of promises (Radan & Gooley, 2010). Consideration is the price paid by the offeree in exchange for the goods or service promised by the offeror. The provision of a consideration is an essential evidence of a persons wish to enforce a contract. The key element of what can constitute a consideration is that it should be something of value. A consideration must not be adequate, but the law requires that it should be sufficient even when it is of a smaller economic value. In order for a consideration to be valid, it should be executed in response to the promiser’s promise to fulfil their obligations in the context of the current agreement. Step 3: Linking the Rules of Law to the Case The intention on the part of Josh (the offerer) to enter into a legally binding agreement with Matt (the offeree) is arguably owing to the complexity of the relationship between the two parties. Consequently, it can be evaluated that there exists a domestic relationship between Josh and Matt as cousins. However, their relationship does not appear to have influenced the offeror’s quotation of the consideration. The quotation of a consideration lower than the market value of the car is not affected by the domestic relationship between the parties (Radan & Gooley, 2010). The intention with which Joshua proposes to sell the car and Matts willingness to think about it in the very form suggested by Josh is more of a commercial relationship context. In this sense, the parties’ intention can be said to have aimed at the creation of a legally binding relationship. The elements underlying intention of the parties to an agreement is satisfied in the agreement between Josh and Matt. The $5000 proposed selling price for the car forms the consideration in the context of the case. The price creates the legal amount that Matt should pay in exchange for the car according to the original terms of the offer. The change of mind about the price of the car by Josh would amount to a breach of an earlier agreement as Matt expresses his acceptance of the deal before his revocation. Josh submits his intention to revoke the offer belatedly and from a legal perspective, there is a binding contract on the part of Josh to deliver the car to Matt at $5000 consideration. The element of the inadequacy of the consideration for exchanging the car at a price lower than its actual market price is immaterial in the eyes of the law of contract (Radan & Gooley, 2010). The important thing is that the $5000 selling price, though inadequate, is of value. The law considers the valuable aspect of the consideration as opposed to the adequacy. The elements of consideration, as required in the validation of a contract, are met in the context of the case. Step 4: Conclusion Although one may interpret the case as one that falls under the category of domestic relationships between the parties, the reality is that it is more of a commercial agreement. Josh and Matt are both bound by the terms of the contract and any injured party as a result of a breach can seek a legal remedy (Radan & Gooley, 2010). Q2. Using the 4 step process, consider whether the element of the agreement is satisfied in the scenario. Step 1: The Legal Issue The principle of law requires that there must be an agreement between the parties to an agreement for a valid contract to exist (Radan & Gooley, 2010). In the scenario presented in the case, the basis of the existence of a legally binding agreement between Josh and Matt can be judged on the basis of the offer and its acceptance. The aspect of the offerer’s intention to revise the initial terms of the offer does not constitute a dimension that affects the acceptance of Matt to the original offer. In the legal interpretation, a legally binding agreement exists between the seller and the buyer of the car. Step 2: The Specific Rue of Law The law of contract provides that contracts are consensual dealings in which absolute agreement by both parties without any due influence is necessary (Radan & Gooley, 2010). The agreement requires the meeting of the minds of the offeror and the offeree to discuss exclusively what the terms of the contract are. The two main components to consider in evaluating whether an agreement has been met in a contract are ‘Offer and ‘Acceptance. An offer is a statement that signifies the offeror’s willingness to contract. Acceptance, on the other hand, is the assent of the offeree to the terms of the offer. By the requirements of the law, an offer must be promissory and sufficiently complete (Radan & Gooley, 2010). The fundamental aspects of an offer must be clearly outlined for an offer to be said to be sufficiently complete. An offer is meant to be promissory if its wording is done in a way that clearly shows the offerors willingness to honour its terms in case it is accepted by the offeree. It should be more than a mere expression of the offeror’s willingness to do business. An acceptance must conform to the terms of the offer and cannot impose any conditions. More importantly, an acceptance can only be made by the person to whom the offer is proposed and be communicated to the offeror. Once an acceptance is communicated, the agreement becomes binding and cannot be undone. Step 3: Linking the Rule of Law Josh, who is a mature person, makes an offer to sell his second-hand car to Matt. Assuming that Matt immediately accepted the offer, there would have a binding agreement between the two parties at the time. Josh had made up his mind when making the offer signalling his willingness to honour it if in case Matt out rightly accepted it. By nature, it is a promissory offer and not a mere expression by Josh of his willingness to do business. The intention is to dispose of the old car in order to buy a new one and not to make a profit out of it. The offer made by Josh targets selling a BMW second-hand car at $5000. The ability to identify the item being sold, its price and the person to whom it was being sold makes the offer sufficiently complete (Radan & Gooley, 2010). Acceptance of an offer must not be made immediately after the offer is made. There is a provision of time within which the making of an acceptance of declination to the offer by Matt would have lapsed. Both Josh and Matt were in an agreement that Matt was to sleep over the matter and make his response via phone the following morning. Josh had the opportunity to revoke the offer before Matt accepted it. However, Matt communicates his acceptance to Josh before he could revoke the offer. It is arguable whether the fact that Josh and not Matt had called would have an impact in judging the validity of the acceptance. Of importance is the fact that Matt accepts the offer at exactly the time he was supposed to confirm it (Radan & Gooley, 2010). Therefore, there is evidently the constitution of a valid offer and a valid acceptance in the case amounting to a binding agreement between Josh and Matt. The elements of the agreement are satisfied in the case. Step 4: Conclusion The argument of Josh about changing his mind, the discovery of the actual market value of the car and his relationship with Matt come at a time when they cannot stand the ground in law. According to the case, these remain as thoughts in the mind that are overtaken by Matt’s acceptance of the offer that legalises their contractual relationship. Josh is obliged to surrender the car to Matt at the stated $5000 selling price. In case Josh breaches the contract, Matt can sue for damages (Radan & Gooley, 2010). References Radan, P., & Gooley, J. (2010). Principles of Australian contract law. Chatswood, N.S.W.: LexisNexis Butterworths. Read More

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Specific Rules of Law

Egyptian Political History

The paper "Egyptian Political History" reminds Egypt stands out as one of the earliest countries in which religion played a great role in its ancient civilization.... The political powers were associated with kings or Pharaohs in the time, who not only acted as gods of the people but ruled the kingdoms....
6 Pages (1500 words) Research Paper

Law and Justice Relationship Philosophy

This paper ''law and Justice Relationship Philosophy'' tells that According to Aristotle, while all persons share a common "nature," some persons can acquire by engaging in habitual behaviour something like a "second nature" that is as much a determinant of their actions as is their "first" nature.... Judges should correct errors of the law, rising from oversight by the lawmakers, given there are rules to be corrected in the first place.... The result is, in the words of Jerome Frank, "injustice is according to law....
29 Pages (7250 words) Essay

Foundations of Chinese and African Laws

In order to gain knowledge of African law, one must closely observe and learn from experiential accounts of its subjects.... However, what is interesting to note is that even though one law is already codified and the other unwritten, by looking into the origins and the spirits of the laws of these countries, there are similarities in them that are worth looking into.... To illustrate this point, let us take into consideration the Chinese and the African setting, taking into specific consideration the origin and foundations of such laws....
9 Pages (2250 words) Case Study

Humanitarian Law Specific Protections

The essay "Humanitarian law Specific Protections" discusses specific protections for medical personnel, clergymen, and journalists under international humanitarian law.... The fundamental aspect of international humanitarian law is the distinction between civilians and people who are engaged in some kind of combat.... As per the law, protection is given to all civilians and civilian objects.... Moreover, international humanitarian law specifically mentions certain types of civilians who will be given protection also....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Law and Justice Relationship Philosophy

Aristotle and Plato have debated about the Rule of law.... This paper "law and Justice Relationship Philosophy" focuses on the fact that according to Aristotle, while all persons share a common "nature," some persons can acquire by engaging in habitual behaviour something like a "second nature" that is as much a determinant of their actions.... Judges should correct errors of the law, rising from oversight by the lawmakers, given there are rules to be corrected in the first place....
20 Pages (5000 words) Assignment

Difference Between Morality and Law

quinas argues that natural law is an ordinance of reason in the sense that it involves measures and rules of acts that induce people to act or restrains them from acting.... The paper "Difference Between Morality and law" describes that prerogative power is the ability of an executive to protect the public good by acting in cases which seems difficult for a legislature to act upon.... Prerogative also gives the executive the power to act on areas where the law is useless....
9 Pages (2250 words) Assignment

The Rules of Statutory Interpretation

he golden rule of interpreting law allows courts of law to examine the ordinary meaning of statutes, but then circumvent absurdity where the ordinary interpretation would create such an outcome.... Court orders barring pieces of legislation, wherein the opinion of the court there is some inconsistency in the drafting of the statutory bodies in respect of fundamental rules or other basic bodies of law, courts may sometimes exercise powers that are otherwise not clearly within their jurisdiction1....
8 Pages (2000 words) Report

Main Provisions of the Hague-Visby Rules

Drafted in 1924, the official title for the regulation is the "International Convention for the Unification of Certain rules of law relating to Bills of Lading.... The paper "Main Provisions of the Hague-Visby rules" explains that the rules are favorable to the carrier than a shipper.... This obligation is covered by current regimes such as the Hague-Visby rules, The Hague rules, and the Hamburg rules....
19 Pages (4750 words) Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us