StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Atomic Bombing Issues - Essay Example

Summary
The essay "Atomic Bombing Issues"  critically analyzes the main issues concerning the for and against arguments of the atomic bombing. Since the atomic bombings of Japanese cities in November 1945 by Americans, various theories have been put forward to explain whether this action was justified…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.9% of users find it useful

Extract of sample "Atomic Bombing Issues"

Atomic Bombing Name: Institution: Atomic Bombing Since the atomic bombings of Japanese cities in November 1945 by Americans, various theories have been put forward to explain whether this action was justified. These theories suggest a disagreement among ‘orthodox,’ ‘revisionist,’ and other theories about underlying reasons for Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings (Bernstein, 1996). Orthodox theorists believe the bombings were necessary to force Japanese to surrender. Revisionist theorists argue that Americans were not justified because there were other available alternatives to conclude the war without devastating consequences. According to Bernstein (1996), some of these strategies included carrying out (with advance warning) a demonstration of the bombs; persuading peace feelers to encourage Japanese to surrender; and using a naval blockade and conventional bombs to choke Japanese. On the other hand, other theorists borrow from orthodox and revisionist arguments to justify the American actions. Among these three arguments, analysis of events preceding the November bombings support revisionist’s view that other alternatives (without the bombings) would have worked effectively. According to Bernstein (1996), Americans could have used noncombat demonstration of the atomic bomb to make Japanese surrender. This required the Americans to give the Japanese an advance warning before carrying out the demonstration. However, uncertainties surrounding this alternative made it an ineffective strategy to force the Japanese to seek peace (Bernstein, 1996). Americans were not sure whether this demonstration would work according to expectations. They feared that Japanese would become emboldened if the atomic bomb failed to detonate. They also feared that an advance warning to Japanese would expose prisoners of war to danger, as Japanese military would take them to the expected demonstration site. American military advisers did not effectively consider this alternative because they had different bureaucratic interests. In addition, American military advisers doubted whether the demonstration would make Japanese militarists change their minds. These militarists seemed in pursuit of their own bureaucratic interests as witnessed after the two atomic bombings and entry of Soviet Union into the war (Bernstein, 1996). Despite the devastating consequences of the atomic bombs on Japanese cities, the militarists insisted on fighting to prevent land invasion. These factors indicates that the atomic bombs were unnecessary because they were used without consideration and did not compel all Japanese consider surrender. A guarantee of the imperial system and alteration of unconditional surrender presents another alternative that Americans could have used to make Japanese consider peace (Bernstein, 1996). Despite disagreements between Japanese cabinet and military, this strategy would have encouraged them to consider peace. Even though all Japanese identified preservation of the imperial system as one the key terms of surrender, militarists and other government officials could not agree on other conditions. Militarists wanted to continue with war until almost all their terms of surrender were met. After surrender, they wanted to be promised that they would be allowed to conduct their own trials on war crimes, disarm themselves, and Americans would not occupy Japan. On the other hand, other government officials were not sure about how to end the Pacific War. While negotiating for peace with Americans, they were also negotiating with Russians to prevent entry of Soviets into the war. They also did not want to take anti-military actions, fearing that this would trigger a military coup. Americans were determined to use the atomic bombs regardless of whether this strategy worked or did not work. President Truman and his advisers believed that use of the bombs would justify to Americans why the military diverted scarce resources to the bomb project (Bernstein, 1996). To some extent, this indicates that American leaders did not attack Hiroshima and Nagasaki cities using atomic bombs to serve military purposes, but rather political interests at home. Japan would have agreed to surrender if America agreed to all terms put forward by Japanese military and cabinet. Use of informal discussions or peace feelers to persuade Japanese to surrender presents another alternative to use of atomic bombs. However, the likelihood of success of this strategy was minimal. Even though these peace feelers wanted Japanese to surrender, they lack political influence. They comprised of middle-level Japanese in Switzerland. They did not have strong relationships with political and military leaders back home. They had proposed to Allen Dulles, an American diplomat in Switzerland, that the imperial system was the only important condition to Japanese surrender (Bernstein, 1996). However, intercepted communication between Japanese officials suggested disagreements at home. In some cases, these interceptions indicated that Japanese military was suspicious of American activities. On the other hand, Americans did not believe these peace feelers had the political strength needed to end the war quickly. Under these circumstances, the atomic bombing of Hiroshima was necessary to compel Japanese military consider surrender. However, the Nagasaki bombing was unnecessary because some of the Japanese military had started considering surrender after the Hiroshima bombing and entry of Soviet Union into the war (Bernstein, 1996). American leaders’ views on the impact of Russian entry into the war indicate that the atomic bombing of Japanese cities was not warranted. According to Bernstein (1996), the leaders believed that entry of Soviet Union into the pacific war would have forced Japanese to consider capitulation. The Japanese felt that involvement of a third force into the war would put pressure on the already stressed military resources. Despite American knowledge of these developments, its leaders were determined to use the atomic bombs. Even though President Truman argued that Russian entry would be decisive, he planned to use the bomb to achieve political objectives (Bernstein, 1996). He wanted to show Americans that the ‘Manhattan’ (the atomic bombs) was a good public project. The Americans also did not want to expose military personnel to risks associated with land invasion. However, the leaders understood that these strategies without the atomic bomb would have worked effectively, even though not quickly as expected. This implies that they could have delayed use of the atomic bombs until after the entry of the Russians. Therefore, the atomic bombs were not necessarily used to compel Japanese to surrender, but rather to show supremacy of the American military. The siege strategy remains the most effective alternative that would have resulted in Japanese capitulation without the need of atomic bombs. This strategy comprised of conventional bombing of Japanese cities and naval blockade (Bernstein, 1996). It was working very effectively, as it caused great destruction of military power of Japan. For the Americans, the only justification they could offer for the atomic bombing was a quick victory. This demonstrates the atomic bombing was unwarranted because the siege strategy would have starved and forced Japanese to conclude peace. Of these five alternatives, the siege strategy seems the most appropriate alternative to atomic bombing. It would have produced similar outcomes to the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombing, even though at a prolonged period. In addition, it would have led to end of the pacific war without the devastating consequences on the atomic bombs on Japanese population. In conclusion, ‘revisionists’ seem reasonable when they argue that the atomic bombings of Japanese cities were unwarranted. Americans could have applied other strategies, such as modification of terms of surrender, use of informal discussions with for-peace Japanese, siege strategy, and demonstration of the atomic bombs. However, the need for speedy conclusion of the Pacific War, bureaucratic interests, political interests, and desire for supremacy influenced greatly the use of the atomic bombs by Americans. For example, President Truman conceded knowing that entry of Russian military into the war would be decisive, but still choose to allow use of the atomic bombs to destroy the Japanese. Therefore, if the bombs were used for military purposes, Americans would have at least given the other strategies time to work before proceeding to bomb the Japanese cities. Reference Bernstein, B. (1996). Understanding the atomic bomb and the Japanese surrender: Missed opportunities, little-known near disasters, and modern memory. In M.J. Hogan (Ed.), Hiroshima in history and memory (pp.38-79). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Read More

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Atomic Bombing Issues

US Dropping of Two Atomic Bombs on Japan

On 9th August, 1945, three days after the bombing of Hiroshima, Fat Man, next nuclear weapon was dropped in Nagasaki over the north factory.... US Dropping of Two atomic Bombs on Japan ... US Dropping of Two atomic Bombs on Japan ... The historical event During the final stages of the World War II (WWII), United States of America dropped two atomic bombs on the Nagasaki and Hiroshima.... Under the executive order of Harry Truman, the US president, the US dropped Little Boy, a uranium atomic bomb, on the city of Hiroshima, the 7th largest city in Japan....
8 Pages (2000 words) Research Paper

The Atomic Bombing of Nagasaki

This research paper "The atomic bombing of Nagasaki" discusses the decision by President Harry S.... The subsequent August 9 bombing of Nagasaki killed some 80,000.... The bombing of Nagasaki was both necessary and militarily expedient.... Shortly after the Hiroshima bombing President Truman addressed the American people regarding his decision and the implications it and nuclear weapons would have for the future of the country and the world....
6 Pages (1500 words) Research Paper

Ethical Dlemma Invovling the Bombing of Hiroshima

The Ethical Dilemma in the bombing of Hiroshima The concept of war brings about questions about the ethics of the actions of the military at the battlefields.... According to Crowe, the bombing of Hiroshima occurred during the August of 1945.... The first ethical debate concerning the bombing of Hiroshima, and the subsequent bombing of Nagasaki, is the fact that the war could have been won without the bombing....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

The Atomic Bombing in Hiroshima and Nagasaki

The paper "The atomic bombing in Hiroshima and Nagasaki" states that the atomic bombing was so far the best course of action by the US as it eventually justified its points and remarkably explicated the greatest good for the greatest number of people.... The atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II is a controversial issue.... There were at most 200,000 Japanese civilians who were reported to die from that nuclear bombing....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki

On August 6, 1945, American Enola Gay dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, its primary target, and gave the whole world "a peep into hell"(qtd.... Within three days, Nagasaki was As commonly perceived, atomic bombs were intended as a deterrent to the German threat, but ended up as an offensive weapon of mass destruction against Japan in order to force an unconditional surrender and to end WWII (Zuberi 623).... his paper explores the horrors of bombings and whether it was justifiable to use atomic bomb against Japan during WWII....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Critiquing Historical Analysis of Classmate - Subject- Atomic Bomb

In the first paragraph, the reviewer commences the study by providing a summary on what The reviewer claims that the idea of the atomic bomb came to existence during WWII.... According to the reviewer, the atomic bomb incident is still controversial to date.... This is evident by the large number of Non-western as well as European historians who are still trying to analyze the atomic bomb issue.... This is because after stating that she would analyze the work of four historians, in the following paragraphs, she talks of different authors in relation to their perceptions as far as the issue of the atomic bomb is concerned....
5 Pages (1250 words) Assignment

Can the the Atomic Bomb dropping on Hiroshima and Nagasaki be ever justified

A demonstration bombing in a remote area of Japan would have been sufficient to affect surrender without using it on a civilian population.... Did President Truman authorize the bombing solely as a means to put an end to a bloody, prolonged conflict and to ultimately save both American and Japanese lives due to an impending invasion on Japan's homeland or was the decision based on assuring that the Soviet Union would not have a say in post-war Asia is it had in post-war Europe?...
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay

Strategic Bombing was Crucial to the Allied Victory

"Strategic bombing was Crucial to the Allied Victory" paper argues that strategic bombing was hard to effectively implement and was met with various failures and mistakes.... The strategic bombing led to the loss of innumerable lives of civilians and the destruction of properties and wasted resources.... Strategic bombing eventually led to the victory of Allied forces against Germany and their supporters.... An allied military strategy using strategic bombing is what played a vital role in ensuring the defeat of Axis powers....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us