StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Marx and Weber Concept of Class in Contemporary Society - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The essay "Marx and Weber Concept of Class in Contemporary Society" focuses on the critical analysis and evaluation of Marx's and Weber's concept of class relevant to understanding contemporary societies. One must look beyond their synoptic treatments of class…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.4% of users find it useful
Marx and Weber Concept of Class in Contemporary Society
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Marx and Weber Concept of Class in Contemporary Society"

Evaluation of Marx's and Weber's concept relevant to understanding contemporary societies To understand the foundations of Marx's and Weber's class analysis one must look beyond their synoptic treatments of class in their well-known and much appreciated works on economy, party concept and class systems. These perceptions and concepts of class are intimately linked to their investigations of the broad problem of rationalization in modern society. Class, in these terms, is the way economic power is distributed when economic action is organized in an instrumentally-rational manner to the greatest degree. The problem of exploitation the extraction of labour effort from workers is treated, in this framework, primarily as a problem of technical efficiency and economic rationality in creating work incentives and effective discipline. This leads to a relatively impoverished conception of the nature of antagonistic interests generated by class relations. Key readings from Marx ("The Communist Manifesto" and "On Classes") and Weber ("Class, Status, and Party") help us understand the sociological analyses of inequality in the concepts of social class, exploitation, surplus value, markets, status, and power. But there is always a difference of opinion between these two thinkers that clearly contrasts Marx's historical materialism and emphasis on class conflict with Weber's exploration of the overlapping sources of inequality in economic, social, and political spheres. (Chatterjee, 83) The importance of production relations in Marxian theory with Weber's emphasis on market relations could be a key prospect in understanding the basic or fundamental influence on modern European society. It could well be suggested that both property and market dynamics are important by relating each to the concepts of class composition. The basic concept may be incorporated into Weber's emphasis on social closure to more clearly differentiate social classes which could develop into a model of class structure, usefully differentiates relational and gradational conceptualizations of social class, and re-visits some key differences between Marxian and Weberian theory. But the end goal being the evaluation of Marxian and Weberian theory in the perspective of the modern society it could be well punctuated that the basic relevance of these perceptions are present even today but not necessarily in a visible manner. The insights of Marx and Weber remain integral to sociological analyses of inequality even as more recent scholarship has promoted more contextual, and some would say more nuanced, models. (Fletcher, 63) The basic perception of Marxian and Weberian theory relate to several critical debates in sociology, including structure versus agency arguments, functionalist versus social conflict models, and the debate over the primacy of class (as opposed to race or gender). In addition, the book's organization invites readers to think sociologically about the evolution of sociological theory itself; the connections between scholarly debates and the historical periods in which they are grounded are evident throughout the society. The concept of Marxian and Weberian theory is also useful for illuminating some of the differences between American and European intellectual traditions. If theoretical frameworks are identified by their silences as loudly as by their proclamations, then one of the defining characteristics of class analysis in Weberian tradition is the virtual absence of a systematic concept of exploitation. Nothing better captures the central contrast between the Marxist and Weberian traditions of class analysis than the difference between a class concept centred on the problem of life chances in Weber and a concept rooted in the problem of exploitation in Marx. This is not to say that Weber completely ignores some of the substantive issues connected to the problem of exploitation. It can be formulated easily, for example, Weber, like Marx, sees an intimate connection between the nature of property relations in capitalism and the problem employers face in eliciting high levels of effort from workers. But he does not theorize this issue in terms of a general concept of exploitation nor does he see the problem of extracting labor effort as a pivotal feature of class relations and a central determinant of class conflict. Instead he treats the problem of eliciting work performance within capitalism as an instance of technical inefficiencies reflecting a tension between formal rationality and substantive rationality within capitalist economic relations. If we take United Kingdoms as a relevant example things would be cleared out much easier in regard to this discussion. "Willingness to work on the part of factory labor has been primarily determined by a combination of the transfer of responsibility for maintenance to the workers personally and the corresponding powerful indirect compulsion to work, as symbolized in the English workhouse system, and it has permanently remained oriented to the compulsory guarantee of the property system."(De & Saha, Weber, 114) Thus, the relevance of work culture into the infusion of society can be well experienced within the framework of the model introduced by both Marx and Weber of a different and variable stratum. It should always be considered that the industrial revolution in Europe, particularly United Kingdoms, gave birth to different aspects of social and cultural changes. Religion was affected in a way too which is still quite relevant and observable in today's society in United Kingdom as well as the rest of Europe. With the advent of the industrial revolution in the18th century the whole Europe saw the birth of a new era with the inventions of 1785 (improved steam engine) 1804 (locomotive) making way towards an age of mass production. With this revolutionary change in the aspect of economy much social contexts began to change. (Khan, 55) As agriculture was not the prime economic outlook there was a sharp drop of birth rate that correspondingly gave way to better living standards and economic individual independence. Development of philosophies like these was never conceptualized before these were introduced. The ideas of Marx and Weber were no different. One of the social elements that were affected, or to be precise effected, by the use of these philosophies was the influence of religion on individual and public perception. Though Marx publicly announced religion as "opium of the mass" it was evident that with the development of economic independence individual beliefs on religion was already on decline. However, with the manifestation of Marx's idea of religion it became evident that religion would not be able to control individual response to nature and perspective. United Kingdom already rejected Christianity in the form of Roman Catholic Church and Marx's idea gave the people of Great Britain enough potential to reject religion at least partially in their personal level. This perception of religion and outlook to life still persists in the day to day livelihood of the common and average British. Therefore the concept of class division enumerated by religion was rejected entirely by the United Kingdom. (Sorabjee, 19) Another more important aspect of the teachings and theories of Marx and Weber are clearly visible on the social context of United Kingdom and the most important segment of these criteria is observed in the context of work environment. The concept of 'dignity of labour' has been injected and well digested within the social and cultural life of all British. This is a huge change from the days of feudal system of the society and theories of Marx and Weber made it sure that at least this aspect would be there to sustain in the sense that this fundamental is basically an irreversible process of the society. In a way, these theories of Marx and Weber could well be concluded as the main architect of shaping and construction the psychology and perception of the British society for a very long run profit return. This return today's United Kingdom is reaping by the dint of free democratic government system providing one of the most transparent democratic system if not the most.. The concepts of the theories of Marx and Weber on class difference still persists to date in United Kingdom in the sense that there are still differences in social and economical classes. But it should be mentioned in the same context that this difference is more of a fiscal data available and required in budget preparation and control and political semi-issue during a campaign. But it should be noted that the relevance of class difference today is low in the parameter of the entire population. However, this should be considered as a prime example where the absence of an element proves the existence of it. In other words the low class difference of today's United Kingdom is due to the perception of class initially put forward by the theories of Marx and Weber. It should always be considered that the theories of Marx and Weber made way for the direct stake holders of the industrial development to concentrate on the well being of their employees on a wide scale. This concept was to yield profit on the longer term but this helped the workers to realise their position in the context of an industry thereby gaining faith in them, thus attaining the needed perspective of human rights. (Lamb, 227) References: De, A & Saha, M; 1998; Quotes from Economists; National Book Trust Lamb, Davis; 2004; Cult to Culture: The Development of Civilization on the Strategic Strata; National Book Trust. Sorabjee, H; 1951; Changes We Saw; Brooks & Dutta Chatterjee, S S; 2006; History of the World; Guild Publishers. Khan, Y M; 2001; History of Industrial Revolution; Madina Publications. Fletcher, R; 2003; On International Politics; Howard & Price; Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Evaluation of Marx's and Weber's concept of class relevant to Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1521705-evaluation-of-marxs-and-webers-concept-of-class-relevant-to-understanding-contemporary-societies
(Evaluation of Marx's and Weber'S Concept of Class Relevant to Essay)
https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1521705-evaluation-of-marxs-and-webers-concept-of-class-relevant-to-understanding-contemporary-societies.
“Evaluation of Marx's and Weber'S Concept of Class Relevant to Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1521705-evaluation-of-marxs-and-webers-concept-of-class-relevant-to-understanding-contemporary-societies.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Marx and Weber Concept of Class in Contemporary Society

Class inequalities in contemporary Britain

Some of the significant contributions of this period are the theories of marx and weber.... Theories of marx and weber The theories of marx and weber have some similarities and differences.... According to Wright (2000) property ownership is one of the sources identified by marx and weber for class division in a capitalist economy.... marx and weber have described classes as an expression for social actors within the society....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

How Weber and Marx's Ideas Help Us Understand the Nature of Today's Political Authority

Even the traditional perspective of sovereignty as the supreme authority has raised intense debates in contemporary societies.... This paper "How weber and Marx's Ideas Help Us Understand the Nature of Today's Political Authority" compares different views on political authority.... weber described charismatic, traditional, and legal-rational forms of authority; while Karl Marx declared the proletarian and bourgeois authority.... ccording to Max weber, authority is defined as the chain of commands obeyed by a specific group of people....
11 Pages (2750 words) Essay

Max Weber and his Methodology

Max Weber is the first theorist to define the concept of the ideal type in his work, where he is of the opinion that scientific methods are unable to replicate the concrete reality existing in a society; consequently a conceptual apparatus does not contain sufficient strength to measure or assess the diversity of a natural or social phenomenon.... (Shils & Finch, 1997)The concept of 'ideal type' is of central importance in the Weber' theoretical framework 'Ideal types', Hekman views, 'are not the product of the whim or fancy of a social scientist, but are logically constructed concepts....
9 Pages (2250 words) Case Study

Ritzer and Weber, Marx and Bellamy Foster, Etzioni and Durkheim and Sociological Theory

By Foster (2000), the use of Marx's ideologies related to the concept of ecology is not something that proves to be a courtesy to the past.... The essay "Ritzer and weber, Marx and Bellamy Foster, Etzioni and Durkheim and Sociological Theory" critically analyze the ideas of three contemporary sociologists in relation to the traditional theories of the most famous classical sociology's theorists.... Foster (2002) also argues that the questions that were raised by Marx in that time 'about capitalist society and even about the relationship between society and nature were often more fundamental than what characterizes social and ecological thought, even on the left, today....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

In What Ways Does Sociological Sense Differ from Common Sense

Despite the differences in their emphasis, both marx and weber greatly influenced scholars, politicians and commentators for generations to come.... marx and weber can also be credited with making sociological discourse accessible to the general population.... Marx's achievement is in attempting to explain social situations and problems from the point of view of the economic class of constituent groups in society.... Max Weber, on the other hand, saw religion to be pivotal to society and hence included religious considerations alongside economic ones....
8 Pages (2000 words) Assignment

Comparison of Marx, Weber, and Durkheim in the Concept of Modern Society

The modern bourgeois society is the result of the history of class warfare whose origins can be traced back to the feudalism that preceded it.... This report "Comparison of Marx, Weber, and Durkheim in the concept of Modern Society" discusses Weber's approach to defining the concept of modern society differs considerably from the approaches of Marx and Durkheim.... Weber's sociology is realistic rather than idealistic whereas the sociology of marx and Durkheim is idealistic instead of realistic....
10 Pages (2500 words) Report

The Marxian and Weberian Approach to Class

"Marxian and Weberian Approach to Class" paper presents a comparison of marx and weber's views on social class.... Both marx and weber have presented important explanations for social class.... Weber challenged Marx that wealth was not the sole factor in determining a person's class in society.... Weber has explained better how societal members get separated into different classes since he covers a wide range of different social factors such as education and occupation in explaining why there is a lot of social inequality in different social classes in the society....
6 Pages (1500 words) Coursework

View on the Society of Marx, Durkheim, and Weber

e states that social change in contemporary society is driven by materials substances that force the relationship between forces and production.... The question that most scholars are asking themselves 'is if the works of Marx had an impact in the society during those early days and the impact it has in the contemporary society' (Craib 1997).... "View on the Society of Marx, Durkheim, and weber" paper analyzes the works of these three sociologists who command a high following in sociology....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us