StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Makers of Modern Strategy - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
 Wu-tzu's writing is comparably dense, fraught with meaning for those who understand what he is talking about. The paper "Makers of Modern Strategy" explores the principles of war to which scholars commonly refer when discussing tactics and strategy. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.5% of users find it useful
Makers of Modern Strategy
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Makers of Modern Strategy"

The principles of war are Objective, Offensive, and Mass, Economy of Force, Maneuver, Unity of Command, Security, Surprise, and Simplicity. To what extent, if any, do Chinese views follow or depart from modern principles, and why?  Your opinions are welcome, but back them up with evidence.

Response

            Sun-Tzu was talking about strategy as contained in his book The Art of War.  The writing that says “the army is established by deceit, moves for advantage, and changes through segmenting and reuniting” must not be taken literally. Sun-Tzu was talking metaphorically.  By deceit, he meant the confidentiality and secrecy character of a military organization.  A military organization’s objective is to win war wars not to be honest.  Divulging one’s military capability blunts its capacity for the offensive.  One must not be “truthful” or “candid” about the status of its military otherwise the enemy would plan against it and could easily defeat it.  By “moves for advantage, and changes through segmenting and reuniting” just meant that a military organization adapts to a situation or its maneuverability by regrouping, and when he mentioned “its speed is like the wind, its slowness like the forest; its invasion and plundering like a fire; unmoving it is like the mountains. It is as difficult to know as the darkness; in movement, it is like thunder", Sun-Tzu merely described the offensive capability of a military organization through a unified command.

            These Chinese views about military tactics and strategies may sound ancient but are still actually present in today’s military tactics.  Sun-Tzu just talked the language of his day but he talked about the “classified nature of the military”, regrouping, organization, the timing of the attack, and the speedy response of military action.  Much of military strategy and tactics today are derived from the principles of Sun-Tzu so Sun-Tzu’s thoughts about tactics and strategies will always be present in military organizations today.

Discussion Topic 2

On January 21, 1955, military historian Michael Roberts delivered a lecture before the Queen's University of Belfast. Published as an article in 1956, "The Military Revolution, 1560–1660." His seminal article has fueled debate in historical circles ever since. Roberts's concept of a military revolution became "orthodoxy" in early modern military history and remained virtually unchallenged until Geoffrey Parker published his article "The `Military Revolution, 1560–1660'—A Myth?" Subsequent studies also failed to disprove Roberts's basic thesis. In 1988 Parker published The Military Revolution: Military Innovation and the Rise of the West, 1500–1800. In this volume, Parker poses the question that shaped the ensuing debate: How was the West—initially so small and deficient in most natural resources—able to overcome this situation through military and naval power and conquer global empires? The debate continues.

The concept of the Military Revolution is hugely important because nearly all the writings that documented the development of strategies and tactics developed in the Renaissance focus on the same principles of war the U.S. and other developed countries take for granted today.  Your review of the chapters in Paret should make this clear.

It is important, however, to think critically about such matters.  Consider our more recent experience in war, particularly since trends that have gained currency in the last decades of the 20th century and the opening of the 21st-century show that accepted principles may no longer be applicable. 

Please consider each of the nine principles and provide examples from your readings that demonstrate their validity.  Then, provide examples from recent conflicts that show they may be wrong.  Be prepared to defend your arguments if your classmates don't agree with you, and I hope not all of them will.  Remember, no fighting in class!  We can argue politely but we won't come to blows!

Response        

In essence, the concept of military revolution as developed during the Renaissance is grounded on the principles of economy, politics, and technology.  In a way, the principles of military revolution were also patterned after the Renaissance itself where creativity and ingenuity were fueled by the strong economy in Italy.  War is an expensive undertaking and Renaissance military theorists understood it very well.  They also understood that ultimately, any conflict must have a political resolution and that technology is a definite advantage for any party engaged in war and in fact can spell the difference between defeat and victory.  Roberts and Parker’s persuasion may differ in some aspects but they are still grounded on these principles.

As an example of recent experience in war, we can take for example the recent war against ISIS in Syria and Iraq where the principles of war developed during the Renaissance is being applied.  First is the enunciation of a clear objective by President Obama to degrade and ultimately defeat Isis.  Second, the avoidance of the use of boots on the ground is consistent with the principle of economy of force in its offensive.  Its assumption as an advisory role to the Iraqi military is also consistent with the principle of unity of command as the US tries to put the organization in an otherwise ineffective military organization.  There is also an aspect of military principle in America’s offensive that was distinctly derived from the Renaissance.  That is, capitalizing on the economy, politics, and technology.  War is an expensive undertaking and must be backed up by a strong economy that the US can afford.  The US also sought allies in the region to make the offensive more effective and politically acceptable.  And the heavy use of aircraft for bombardment is taking advantage of technology to avoid casualties and political ramifications from their respective countries.

Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Discussion Topic Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 1”, n.d.)
Discussion Topic Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 1. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1660506-discussion-topic
(Discussion Topic Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words - 1)
Discussion Topic Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words - 1. https://studentshare.org/history/1660506-discussion-topic.
“Discussion Topic Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words - 1”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1660506-discussion-topic.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Makers of Modern Strategy

Principles of War, Clausewitz and Jomini

Therefore, in terms of strategy, Clausewitz work and theories is more relevant compared to the theories by Jomini.... ?? In addition, Jominian principles of warfare were mostly centered upon the key argument that an effective and successfully war had to adhere to strategy controlled by several consistent principles (Jomini 2008)....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Lessons Studied during the Making of Strategy Course

The author of the "Lessons Studied during the Making of strategy Course" paper argues that the use of strategy has because of technological advancement improved through the years into very effective strategies that are considered assets on the battlefield.... Without a strategy in place during warfare, the soldiers tend to engage in war blindly and the probability of achieving victory is very minimal.... Although strategy in the eyes of skeptics is considered to be an illusion and hence of no consequence, it has its advantages and hence it should be incorporated....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

Great Captains: Napoleon, Ulysses Grant, and Frederick the Great

Several individuals from many walks of life find it quite fascinating to study war strategy over the past several thousand years and how the same strategies have been employed, even though warfare has changed dramatically over time.... f these three captains have employed a particular strategy that brought them a plethora of success, then there is no problem at all making use of that same strategy today.... Being that warfare has changed over the past one hundred fifty years, the study of captains, such as Napoleon, Ulysses Grant, and Frederick the Great is still valid for a modern military professional, as it is these three individuals who have contributed largely to shaping our civilization and making it what it is today....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

The Differences between China and Western Europe

It is also a science since it entails the science of war strategy formulation, for example, the Clausewitz war strategy (Paret, Craig& Gilbert, 1986).... As the paper "The Differences between China and Western Europe" tells, the Chinese had a culture of primitive warrior militancy thus making the nation ready for war and conflict at any particular time, while the emerging Western Europe did not possess a culture of warrior militancy....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Global and Military Strategies of the US, the UK, and the British Commonwealth

Makers of Modern Strategy: From Machiavelli to the Nuclear Age.... The military strategies of the USA and the United Kingdom contrast in the sense that, while the USA focused its war strategy more on air strike and combat power, the United Kingdom highly focused its war strategy on both the water and land combat powers, thus strengthening the.... the United Kingdom and the British CommonwealthThe military strategies of the USA and the United Kingdom contrast in the sense that, while the USA focused its war strategy more on air strike and combat power, the United Kingdom highly focused its war strategy on both the water and land combat powers, thus strengthening the navy and the ,military more than the air force (Paret, 1986)....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

Ancient and Modern Thoughts About Unconventional Warfare

This is because; both the modern and the ancient writings hold that principle of the war that requires a direct, decisive and attainable objective to be the basis of staging.... ... ...
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

Future of Military Affairs and Military Theory

Makers of Modern Strategy: From Machiavelli to the nuclear age.... This would become an effective deterrence strategy, which will serve the current warfare situation better than the battlefront confrontations with the enemy.... Thus, new principles could appear that are aligned to the technological sophistication of the modern warfare....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

Which Characteristic of the Western Way of War Best Exemplifies Warfare in American Civil War

Thesis statement: In the given essay, the evolution of war strategy in terms of technological improvement and strategic thinking is considered as the feature of the Western way of war that can characterize the American Civil War.... Actually, the united strategy of these two international actors occurred as a consequence of two catastrophic World Wars.... In the given essay, the evolution of war strategy in terms of technological improvement and strategic thinking is considered as the feature of the Western way of war that can characterize the American Civil War....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us