StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...

Negligent Tort - Assignment Example

Cite this document
Summary
Negligent Tort Philips and electronic company recalled one of its products from the market due to safety concerns. The product in question is the Metal Halide Lamps. The product was recalled since it caused laceration hazard and fire hazard…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92% of users find it useful
Negligent Tort
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Negligent Tort"

Download file to see previous pages

Tort is any legal or civil injury or harm that is caused or directed to a person, company or a party. We would therefore categorize this action under negligent tort. The following elements constitutes negligent tort. A person or a company must owe the customer or individual in question a product or service. The company or the person must violate a promise and obligation. In this case, Philips Company would be violating the consumer safety Act. The consumer must have suffered injury or loss in the process of using the product or the service.

The injury or loss must be seen because of the negligence of the manufacture of the product or the service. The government to produce products, which are safe and durable, has licensed Philips Company. The government has licensed the company and therefore mandated the company with the duty of care. Duty of care is the relationship and circumstance under which the law recognizes as providing rise to any legal duty to take care of consumers. If Philips Company fails to take care of its consumers then it may lead to legal battle whether the defendant would be liable to pay damages for the loss or damages.

The person that is injured is suffering the loss due to the breach of duty of care by the company. According to the US law, standard of care is the level of conduct expected from Philips Company in this regard to avoid liabilities for negligence. If the company or the person fails to meet the expected standards then there is a breach of duty. Philips Company has the mandate of producing standardized products. The reason for the hazards indicate that the products are substandard and do not meet the requirements of the law.

This is a breach of duty since the company should provide better services with optimum quality to avoid cases injuries to the consumers. If any person had suffered any injury or harm while using the lamps, the person would be protected from the negligence of the consumer through the negligence liability. The law requires that consumers conform to the standard of care by providing information regarding any under standardized products. Breach of duty occurs when the defendant, which in this case is Philips Company, fails to meet the standards that is set or required by the law.

The state expects that companies licensed to provide services to the consumers meet the expected standard. The consumers Act protect from malice and under standardization the consumers. The consumer Act protects all consumers from exploitation. Once it is established that Philips Company owes a consumer the duty of care, it is necessary for the consumers to demonstrate to the court that the company’s action was in breach of duty. Actual causation is the factor that leads to the occurrence of the event.

If the factor were missing then the event would not occur. In other words, actual causation is also termed as factual cause. As the consumer, it is important to prove to the courts that if Philips Company would have made the wires in such a way that they will not arc, burn and cause fire leading to shattering and laceration, the injury or loss would not occur. The complainant must present his/her defense in the following manner, “but for the existence of A, would B have occurred”. Proximate causation or legal cause existence is when the complainant proves that the defendant’s negligence is a substantial factor that has led to the injury or loss

...Download file to see next pages Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Negligent Tort Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/business/1480418-negligent-tort
(Negligent Tort Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
https://studentshare.org/business/1480418-negligent-tort.
“Negligent Tort Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/business/1480418-negligent-tort.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Negligent Tort

The Legality of Risk Management

Negligent Tort is one of the common liabilities that are incurred in hospital ‘set-ups'.... The first essential element in a Negligent Tort is the existence of duty of care owed by one party to another.... Standard of care The case illustrates the tort of negligence in healthcare.... A proof of negligent case must therefore satisfy some essential elements....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

JP Morgan Chase - Bank of the United States

The role of Security agencies such as SEC and CFTC is discussed in depth along with the description about valid contract, intentional and Negligent Tort action, fiduciary duty and the software used by banks so as to protect online transactions.... JPMorgan Chase [Name] [University] Abstract This paper aims to provide details about the fraud case of JP Morgan Chase, the biggest bank of United States of America....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

JP Morgan Chase - Valid Contract, Good Faith and Fair Dealing

hellip; In addition to this, the paper has also discusses different responsibilities of SEC and CFTC, elements of a valid contract, tort actions, contractual relations, fiduciary duty and the protection procedures of online transactions.... JPMorgan Chase [Name] [University] Abstract This paper aims to discuss the JP Morgan Chase with respect to the trading loss which was faced by the bank in summer 2012....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

JP Morgan Chase

This incident has forced the researcher to write this essay addressing various topics such as role of Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in preventing high risk gamble in securities, different elements of valid contract, banking relationship between customers and banks, difference between intentional and Negligent Tort actions etc....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Public Policy: Impose Duty Of Care In Negligence

An author of the essay "Public Policy: Impose Duty Of Care In Negligence" outlines that In the class of actions under tort law which is negligence, public policy impinged on the judicial decisions by graduating the duty of care imposed upon the defendant of the case.... nbsp; Before the Scot case of Donoghue v Stevenson3 in 1932 there was no generalized duty of care in negligence, it was the operating procedure of the courts to deal with torts in a case by case bases and tort was applied in particular situations where the courts had decided that a duty should be owed, e....
15 Pages (3750 words) Essay

Love. Negligent Tort

This paper seeks to discuss concepts… The paper will discuss the elements of Negligent Tort and the available remedies for the tort. Negligent Tort is characterized by breach of a person's duty of care, to others, and a subsequent legal injury caused by the breach.... There exist four basic Negligent Tort 16 February Negligent Tort The term tort refers to wrongful acts, leading to legal damage, committed by one party to another....
2 Pages (500 words) Coursework

JP Morgan Chase and Capacity of the Parties to Contract

The mission of administrative agencies, for example, the Securities and Exchange Commission or the Commodities Futures Trading Commission is to facilitate capital formation, protect investors, and maintain efficient, orderly, and fair markets.... These administrative agencies… For example, the Securities and Exchange Commission manages mutual funds, security exchanges, investment advisors, and securities dealers and brokers....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Tort Law, Occupiers Liability Act of 1984

Strict liability means that a party is imposed with a liability without evidence of committing any offense such as negligence or tort (Alix Adams, 2012).... This meant that occupiers are under obligation of owing a duty to the trespassers or even visitors (Jones, 1984).... This Act requires that the occupier does not pose any… The argument behind this case is that the occupier conducting the construction operations is aware of the danger and therefore is under obligation to offer protection. One such case which was controversial was This case had to be referred to the Law Commission due to the uncertainties and lack of sufficient material to make judgment about the case....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us