StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The Gay Marriage Debate: Finding a Common Ground - Research Paper Example

Cite this document
Summary
Today numerous gay couples in numerous countries have disproved this prejudice. This wrong idea of homosexuality beforehand lowered the entire individual and his/her…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.1% of users find it useful
The Gay Marriage Debate: Finding a Common Ground
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "The Gay Marriage Debate: Finding a Common Ground"

The Gay Marriage Debate: Finding a Common Ground Introduction Intimacy, partnership, romance, love, and marriage could never belong to gay couples, it was erroneously argued. Today numerous gay couples in numerous countries have disproved this prejudice. This wrong idea of homosexuality beforehand lowered the entire individual and his/her purposes and ambitions to sheer sex, disregarding the complete and affectionate individual as well as his/her spiritual, civil, and creative nature (Wolfson 10).

The legalization of gay marriage is a contemporary occurrence that is regarded very contentious by a large number of people, heterosexual and homosexual alike. This essay discusses in detail the debate on gay marriage. Despite one’s opinion on the issue, gay marriage has appeared across the globe to endure. On the 9th of December 2004, Canada’s Supreme Court decided that gay marriage is compatible with the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the constitutional paper that guarantees human rights for every Canadian (Nagle 103).

The circumstances in the U.S. are more complex. The standing of gay marriage in the country will necessitate legal amendment to both national and state laws. As a result, the legalization of gay marriage all over the United States will take a much longer time and greater effort. Nevertheless, the country has become one of the very few to legalize gay marriage. Is Gay Marriage Good for the United States? There are well-intentioned and reasonable individuals on either side of the gay marriage debate.

Unluckily, though, it has been one of the most controversial problems in any country today. 17 out of 50 states allow same-sex marriage while 10 additional states are okay with unions and partnerships. (Ahuja, Barnes, et. al) Critics of gay marriage see the other party as part of a faction of policymakers, judges, and gay radicals, determined to insult traditional social values (Rauch 63). Advocates of gay marriage generally see the other party as religious fanatics or ‘homophobic’ hypocrites who aim to divest homosexual couples of the right to enjoy privileges granted to others (Rauch 63-64).

The gay marriage debate has created a rift among people who have shared beliefs and ideals on numerous basic issues—economic stability, violence and nonviolence, democracy against the undemocratic and oppressive character of the American state. The conflict-ridden debate weakens the capability of average American people to find a common ground. Numerous people who define themselves as radicals, leftists, or liberals sadly take advantage of the issue as a confirmation, and view anyone who opposes gay marriage as an adversary (Eskridge 44).

Therefore an evidence-based discourse wherein both parties recognize and understand the essentially honorable ideals that inspire the other party is crucially needed. There are explanations for the dominance of the unfavorable views of individuals on the opposing parties in this debate. Detractors of gay marriage usually do not provide compelling arguments for their disapproval. Usually they merely refer to the Bible or give ambiguous statements claiming that gay marriage is clearly insane or an abnormality.

Most of these opponents of gay marriage think that everyone is already aware of the cons of gay marriage, or must be aware, and those who are not yet aware will stay unaware, hence sensible claims are not needed (Spilsbury 92). Advocates of gay marriage, knowing that most have opposed gay marriage in statewide polls attempt to remove the issue from the opinion poll, expecting that judges will legalize it through a court resolution, just like what occurred in Massachusetts. Thus, they have seemed to the other party as social-engineering experts resentful of the core notion of democracy—that average individuals are capable of making crucial decisions in society (Spilsbury 92-94).

Nevertheless, there are also explanations for the unjust and deceptive nature of the views of individuals on both sides of the debate. Advocates of gay marriage apparently do not see themselves as expert social engineers. They only argue that it is incorrect to vote on issues of rights. They believe that there is no justification to dispute gay marriage other than prejudice, and believe it is as unjust to allow citizens to vote on the right of gay couples to marry as it would be to allow citizens to vote on the intermarriage or civil rights (Polikoff 59).

It does not mean that they oppose democracy; it implies that they want justice. On the other party in the debate, individuals are not the illogical fanatics they are described to be. Consider the fact that detractors of gay marriage usually refer to the Bible as their justification. Does this reveal that they hold no reasonable justification for their arguments because they accept as true what the Bible says? Obviously, those who use the Bible to justify their opposition to gay marriage do not trust in Biblical power on the whole.

Individuals select and get from the Bible to justify issues that they trust separately of the Bible. People do not trust slavery hence they do not use the Bible to defend it (Nagle 35). They do defy gay marriage and hence they refer to the Bible on that issue. Normally an individual who discerningly mentions the Bible against gay marriage may have justifications that s/he cannot express eloquently or persuasively. People are not accustomed to explaining conclusively the reasons they support a side.

Marriage is just the newest episode in a long discourse over homosexual equality, not the first, and definitely not the last. However, the evolution of marriage has endowed this discourse particular importance for all parties because the right to marry, as well as the right to choose who to marry, has been considered a core civil right and a dominant sign of citizenship and absolute equality.Numerous fanatics intensely challenge gay marriage because they believe that such right is the definitive sign of the equality they would not grant to homosexuals—and because they are alarmed with the possibility of it promoting the increasing freedom of heterosexual couples to discuss the conditions of their marital union without being restrained by the laws that once rigidly ruled the responsibilities of wives and husbands (Rauch 69).

A large number of homosexuals have supported the movement for same-sex marriage because they, also, view marriage equality as a core symbol of their absolute citizenship and equality, and because acquiring the numerous obligations, guarantees, privileges, and benefits granted by marriage would have numerous tangible consequences for their lives. Nobody can know for sure the future of the gay marriage debate or the status of homosexuals in American society. Hence, it is difficult to find a different group whose situations and public status have transformed quite conclusively in a very short time.

For numerous years now, and particularly since the 1990s, the American people have become more acquainted with homosexuals and more understanding and sympathetic of them (Wolfson 82). Most of all, there has been streams of changes in the outlooks of the young people, who have been raised in a world where they are aware of homosexuals and witness them treated with the decency and courtesy any human being is worthy of. ConclusionsThe detractors of gay marriage identify such changes as well. Their efforts to initiate a constitutional revision on marriage comes from their resolve to enforce the inequality and prejudice of the past into the present and future by inscribing them as absolute laws.

History is counteracting them (Polikoff 92). Yet none in history is unavoidable. As usual, the future lies in the hands of the people themselves. The real issue is that there is no true democracy. If there is true democracy, there would be opportunities to talk about crucial issues in a positive, beneficial way. The mass media should facilitate this, not hamper it. The time is ripe for individuals on opposite parties of this and other major issues that face the American society unite to determine a common ground of courtesy and civility to resolve them.

Works CitedAhuja Masuma, Barnes Robert, et. al. “The changing landscape on same-sex marriage.” WP Politics. The Washington Post, 14 April 2014. Web. 10 May 2014. Eskridge, William & Darren Spedale. Gay Marriage: For Better or Worse?: What We’ve Learned from the Evidence. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2006. Print.Nagle, Jeanne. Same-Sex Marriage: The Debate. New York: The Rosen Publishing Group, 2010. Print. Polikoff, Nancy. Beyond Straight and Gay Marriage: Valuing All Families Under the Law.

New York: Beacon Press, 2008. Print.Rauch, Jonathan. Gay Marriage: Why it is good for gays, good for straights, and good for America. New York: Macmillan, 2005. Print. Spilsbury, Louise. Same-Sex Marriage. New York: The Rosen Publishing Group, 2011. Print.Wolfson, Evan. Why Marriage Matters: America, Equality, and Gay People’s Right to Marry. New York: Simon and Schuster, 2007. Print.

Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“The Gay Marriage Debate: Finding a Common Ground Research Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/english/1645541-the-gay-marriage-debate-finding-a-common-ground
(The Gay Marriage Debate: Finding a Common Ground Research Paper)
https://studentshare.org/english/1645541-the-gay-marriage-debate-finding-a-common-ground.
“The Gay Marriage Debate: Finding a Common Ground Research Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/english/1645541-the-gay-marriage-debate-finding-a-common-ground.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Gay Marriage Debate: Finding a Common Ground

Constitutional and Administrative Law

marriage unions for people of the same sex, commonly referred to as gay marriages, have in the past attracted criticism especially from the church as well as the society at large.... However, various governments around the world have continued to accommodate gay marriages An example is the legislation in the UK popularly known as the Civil Partnership Act of 2005 to protect the minority gay community from discrimination (Spilsbury, 2008)....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Age in Relationships

In marriage and love relationships, age factors determine the level of life satisfaction which in turn affects self esteem and self worth.... Psychological satisfaction is the basic importance that relationships such as marriage ought to achieve in an individual's life.... The importance of social satisfaction inside the marriage must always come from the individual, with personal life playing the important part.... Relationships have several considerations that ought to be made when individuals are planning to look for partner, probably to end up with in a marriage....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Writing and Reporting News, page 94, exercise 2

In the article, it brought about the divide between the republicans who do not support gay marriage.... gay marriage has been on debate for a very long time on whether to make it legal on various states.... Marriage vote could re-engage 2014 campaignsIn an article written by Rick Pearson on November 6th, 2013 about the legalization gay marriage in Illinois as having made a boost to the Democrats in the forthcoming elections.... She reported that the common social media sites like Facebook and Twitter promoted the culture of narcissism....
1 Pages (250 words) Assignment

Is Internet Additive

Furthermore, the sociologists argue that internet addiction has common signs such as individuals having their minds preoccupied when online and even when away from the internet, not being time conscious when using the internet, and having mood fluctuations when not using the internet.... The question of whether the Internet is addictive or otherwise is a topic that has continuously elicited debate from supporters and critics across the world in equal measure In terms of technology, the internet is the fastest growing and invaluable technological tool that has… n utilized by the highest number of people across the world due to its ability to give a wide search platform for various information, and as a socialization tool through social networking among other activities....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

What Is the Meaning of the Word History

Despite our different paths to America, I find myself connected to Kincaid because the common thread of a lack of accurate knowledge about our history runs through the fabric of our present.... The students attempted to mingle and meet with each other in hopes of finding new friends....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Reflection on the Corruption in Media

This essay will critically evaluate the contemporary mainstream media and highlight some of the ill effects of media.... The writer claims that the media is a source of corruption in our society in a number of different ways, some very obvious and others so subtle that they are completely negligible....
13 Pages (3250 words) Essay

The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law

hellip; Notions of “the common good” serve to identify a common interest within a population of people.... Because a common good is shared by most, if not everyone, in the political community, there is a strong interest in codifying those things.... The purpose of this paper is to discuss how the legal system should be used to promote the concept of "common good".... Those things or activities that match “the common good” are thus identified as good in a moral sense....
7 Pages (1750 words) Term Paper

Faith in Public Policy Choices

The author of the paper "Faith in Public Policy Choices" will begin with the statement that the role of religion in American politics has frequently been a subject of scrutiny....  This is essential because religion is one of the fundamental forces in an overwhelming majority of American citizens....
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us