StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Criticism Against American Exceptionalism - Literature review Example

Cite this document
Summary
The purpose of the following literature review is to provide an overview of common criticism ascribed to American exceptionalism. The writer will define the concept of exceptionalism as well as investigate its role in the history of the United States…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.3% of users find it useful
Criticism Against American Exceptionalism
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Criticism Against American Exceptionalism"

Critique of American exceptionalism American exceptionalism con s the belief held by American citizens that the United s is a unique state in light of past development that has taken place in contrast to other countries. Exceptionalism could easily be narrowed down into nationalism but its extremes are more concentrated and more expansive than that. The belief is a famous ideal that many American conservatives hold, although the enticement is not totally limited to the desired end. Various liberal politicians and historians have adopted certain facets of American exceptionalism, particularly, in the “end of ideology” and “vital center” perceptions that are popular among the liberals from America in the mid of the 20th century that followed the Second World War. American exceptionalism is a strong belief encompassed in neo-conservatism. From a historiographical point of view, it can be noted that one of the key features of American exceptionalism is its norm of glossing over what should be considered as “bad” history, for instance, segregation, its treatment of Native Americans, slavery, and the South of Jim Crow, and how it lays emphasis on mythologizing the Founding Fathers, George Washington, and the US constitution, the Wild West”, and how the united states involves itself in world wars. American exceptionalism may perceive the United States via the lens of a certain historical determinism for the US, which is very distinct from the wide historical norms in the other parts of the world (Ruggie 64). This belief may, for different reasons, perceive the United States as a nation that should not be a victim of practices like dictatorship and terrorism. The United States is actually expected to assume the role of an activist all over the world in the promotion of “freedom” or its state of “shining example”. This type of moral superiority that is presumptive, virtually, is not always and is never embraced by the other countries, and is mostly resented, specifically when the United States has a remarkable history of its engagement in the diplomacy of gunboat. The Americans’ belief in American exceptionalism is one among the reasons people from all over the world express their resentments or dislike for the USA. In the year 2012, Dave Dougherty and Larry Schweikart, the conservative historians from U.S, gave their perception about American exemptionalism. They argued out that it was founded upon four pillars which comprised of the sanctity accorded to private property, free-market capitalism, morality and virtues that are deeply-rooted in protestant Christianity and fourthly, the Common Law (Schweikart 42). The criticisms for the belief in American exceptionalism were aired very much in the late 20th century, as well as the early 21st century. The arguments given by the critics were mostly based on the inadequacy of societal morals and also the observation regarding America’s power declining through double standards. In the introductory remarks of his book, an editor known as Michael Ignatieff, who wrote the book known as “American Exceptionalism and Human Rights”, clearly cites that the emphasis of the topic he aired was fully based on scorn. He acknowledges the presence of three major facets that support American exemptionalism. These types comprise of exemptionalism, legal isolationism and double standards. Exemptionalism, as the first facet, implies that treaties should be given full support under the special conditions that the citizens from the United States are not supposed to commit to the treaties. The second facet, double standards, implies that the inhabitants of other countries faced stiff criticisms if they did not give much attention to the discoveries that bodies that are concerned with human rights, though the discoveries made by similar bodies in the United States are completely and totally disregarded. The third and last facet that Michael put forward is legal isolationism, which implies that the judges based in the United States have the notion of disregarding the jurisdictions put forward by other judges (Ignatieff 55). During the tenure of George W. Bush, the word was somehow distracted from its original context. The opponents as well as the proponents of American exceptionalsim started using it to describe the phenomenon wherein specific political interests perceive the United States to be an “exception” or to be “above” the law, and especially, the law that governs the nations. This occurrence is not concerned too much with the justification of the uniqueness of America asserts its exception to the law. The distraction brought the new term that has been causing ripples because its emphasis is unilateral and its original orientation differs somehow with the previous uses of the term. A great deal of the inhabitants who still used the term observing its original version, renowned as traditional American exceptionalism, the context in which still had the idea that America is almost an exceptional nation in comparison to the other nations, and also the feeling that the quality of America as a nation is somehow high than that of other countries globally and that it has a specific essential role to play in the making of world’s history, also admit the public international law is supposed to govern (Carl 101). The first criticism voiced against American excemptionalism is moral purity. Howard Zinn and Marilyn Young voiced it out; they asserted that America’s history had uncountable moral flaws. They observe that the history of America captures slavery, social welfare issues and civil rights issues and hence note that the history fails to be fit to become an exemplar of virtue. Zinn asserts that American exceptionalism fails to be of holistic origin since it was not benign, specifically when tackling issues concerning the Native Americans (Young 79). Further, American exceptionalism is mocked by Donald E. Pease by referring to it as a “myth” and a “state fantasy”, in his book, The New American Exceptionalism, written in 2009. Pease also observes that the state fantasies are unable altogether to hide the inconsistencies found in their mask and, therefore, the bad events like the revelations of the abuse of prisoners at Abu Ghraib expose the incompetence of the government after the Katrina Hurricane, which are open loopholes of the exceptionalism myth. Reinhold Niebuhr, an American theologian, aired out his perception and criticisms regarding American exceptionalism and clearly stated that there was a general postulation that America offers its support as a nation to the good leads that result in moral corruption. He, however, credits the policies made regarding the nation’s Cold Wars. His position was for the liberal idea of the responsibility that gave the justification of other nations’ interference. The second criticism is concerned with the double standards ascribed to American exceptionalism. Historians from the United States like Thomas Bender held the view that attempts ought to need to be made to espouse the recent renewal of American exceptionalism, a problem he regards to have been acquired from the Cold War (Bender 86). Ted Dickson and Gary W. Reichard voiced their argument that the developments witnessed in America have always relied on the transactions it deals with the other nations for populations, cultural values and commodities. Roger Cohen questions exactly how exceptional America could be if every major problem it faces, ranging from terrorism through nuclear proliferation to the prices of gas needs joint action. Harold Koh helps make the distinction between double standards and the mentality of different labels, distinctive rights, and the ‘flying buttress’. The most destructive and dangerous form of the American exceptionalism is exhibited by the fourth face of double standards. The conclusion by Godfrey Hodgson asserts that the national myth of US exceptionalism is dangerous. Samantha Power also comments that America is no longer the shining example. He also adds that it may take long, to the extent of a generation or more, to retain the American exceptionalism. The third criticism is the pre-emptive declinism ascribed to American excptionalism. Herbert London gave the definition of pre-emptive declinism as the postmodern belief that there is no exceptional treatment that should be accorded to United States and it should not be given any role to playa governing role on the entire world’s stage, by virtue of history, different from that of other countries (Herbert 92). London credited the perception to Paul Krugman, among other people. The reason for the credit is that Paul had written his viewpoint in The New York Times, which intimated that it was always known that the reign of America as the greatest nation in the world would finally come to an end though some people thought that the downfall, if it took place, would be something tragic and grand. With regard to Real Clear Politics, the declarations that were made concerning the declining power of America had been common in the media that used English language. Flora Lewis, in 1988, noted that there was some truth in the talks concerning the decline of U.S in relation to the fact that the U.S was unable to give commands at all levels or make payments of their bill. The notion of the special qualities of the American nation held by its inhabitants has far reaching effects and, therefore, it would be wise if it were expunged as a paradigm. Work cited Carl, John D. Think Social Problems. Boston: Pearson, 2011. Print. Bender, Thomas. Rethinking American History in a Global Age. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002. Print. Herbert, George, and Alexander B. Grosart. The Poetical Works of George Herbert. London: G. Bell and Sons, 2002. Print. Ignatieff, Michael. American Exceptionalism and Human Rights. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 2005. Ruggie, John G. American Exceptionalism, Exemptionalism and Global Governance. Cambridge, Mass: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, 2004 Schweikart, Larry, and Dave Dougherty. A Patriots History of the Modern World. New York: Sentinel, 2012. Print.. Young, Marilyn B. The Rhetoric of Empire: American China Policy, 1895-1901. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 2009. Print. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Criticism Against American Exceptionalism Literature review, n.d.)
Criticism Against American Exceptionalism Literature review. https://studentshare.org/history/1848345-critique-of-american-exceptionalism
(Criticism Against American Exceptionalism Literature Review)
Criticism Against American Exceptionalism Literature Review. https://studentshare.org/history/1848345-critique-of-american-exceptionalism.
“Criticism Against American Exceptionalism Literature Review”. https://studentshare.org/history/1848345-critique-of-american-exceptionalism.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Criticism Against American Exceptionalism

The Puritan concept of errand was well suited to the process of Americanization

Name Professor Course Date Sacvan Bercovitch, a scholar of early american Literature proposes, in american Jeremiad, that “Puritan concept of errand was well suited to the process of Americanization” (26).... hellip; The essay has shaped american views in relation to Puritanism.... This opposition extended from; psychology to theology, content against intent, social advancements against catalogues of denunciations....
3 Pages (750 words) Research Paper

Telling Americas Story: Narrative Form and the Reagan Presidency

Although much credit has been given to Reagan for his role in uplifting the nationalistic spirit of american's, various criticisms have emerged that pinpoint his lack of technical reasoning and policy-making abilities.... Although much credit has been given to Reagan for his role in uplifting the nationalistic spirit of american's, various criticisms have emerged that pinpoint his lack of technical reasoning and policy-making abilities.... Despite the many inconsistencies present in his story, he was still able to reach out to the american people and renew their american spirit....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Art Criticism/Formal Theory

However, the mentality that served to re-entrench the racial lines… “Better Homes, Better Gardens”, then, is a satirical look at the prospect of the brightening american future on the heels of the 60s, reiterating the fact the social reform movements that were supposed to bring about a better life for all actually was referring mostly to the white middle class at the expense of those still living in the projects of the country.... Underlining the concept of the missing black man from american history, Marshall's couple is presented in his characteristic true black hue....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Against Marx and Engels Criticism of Private Ownership

For long, the cherished dream (the so-called american Dream) for every family is to own a comfortable house, decent car and have the money to be able to send children to college.... nbsp; against Marx and Engels' criticism of private ownership: One of the cornerstones of Marxist economic theory is the abolition of private property and in its stead have common communal rights....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Depends on what you talk about

Interestingly, the film which will be analyzed and compared/contrast within this brief analysis, “The Maltese Falcon” helps the reader to trace the development of how this concept of trust in the judicial system was introduced into the american consciousness via the silver screen....
5 Pages (1250 words) Assignment

Texas Exceptionalism

The author of the "Texas exceptionalism" paper states that the people of Texas have always viewed themselves as superior to other people.... Later, the Anglo settlers in Texas rebelled against the Mexican rulers and brought about their own form of civilization in Texas....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

Why do you think different administrations differ so greatly on this point

He believed that the decisions the country made The american expansion was a strategy to show the right and anyone who opposed the Americans was considered to be wrong.... This paper discusses the United States mission or desire to spread democracy or freedom and civilization across the world and whether America is a city upon a hill that countries can copy....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

The Criticism of NHST

This article "The criticism of Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST)" states that NHST has actually blocked the advancement of psychology as a science.... belson refutes total criticism of NHST, arguing that critics which reject it due to the fact that the null hypothesis is virtually always false are, in fact, exaggerating their claims.... Although Abelson accepts that they can generate misleading conclusions, he maintains that NHST can be valuable in defending research from the criticism that its results can explain by random factors or that the direction of the mean difference has not been demonstrated convincingly enough....
7 Pages (1750 words) Annotated Bibliography
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us