StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The System Of Finance For Local Government - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
This essay describes the principle of Tiebout’s theory is that the mobility of citizens coupled to inter-jurisdictional competition can lead to a resourceful allotment of resources to the public sector. The model was primarily concerned with finding a market-like mechanism…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.8% of users find it useful
The System Of Finance For Local Government
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "The System Of Finance For Local Government"

The System Of Finance For Local Government The Tiebout model is an economic model explaining competition among the state and local governments. The principle of Tiebout’s theory is that the mobility of citizens (consumer-voters) coupled to inter-jurisdictional competition can lead to a resourceful allotment of resources to the public sector (Billings 2008, p. 36). The model was primarily concerned with finding a market-like mechanism that would achieve an efficient allocation of resources to the public sector. The main finding included the fact that inter-jurisdictional competition is a vital element of the mechanism. The key players in Tiebout’s model are individual citizens and governments. business firms are not an explicit part of the model (Brueckner 2004, p 138). It was meant to be applied to local governments and to a lesser degree, to state governments. The model assumes citizens have full knowledge of government revenue and expenditure packages, that there are a large number of communities among which individuals can choose to live, and that people will opt for the community that best satisfies their preferences. Moreover, the model assumes that government services exhibit no spillover effects (Billings 2008, p 45). Tiebout’s model made three additional assumptions; one, that jobs impose no locational constraint on individuals; two, that a community’s optimal size, meaning the size for which the average cost of producing a particular packages of public services is minimized, can be determined; and three, that each community seeks to attain its optimal size (Feiock 2004, p. 76). The model envisions citizens sorting themselves out among available communities so that demands for government services within any particular community would become homogenous. In theory, Tiebout concluded that to the extent these rather restrictive assumptions are met, good and services provided by the local public sector will exhibit both allocative efficiency (the right amounts of the various good and services are produced ) and productive efficiency (they are produced at least cost) (Rivkin 2001, p. 206). In Tiebout’s model, community taxes would be benefit taxes, or proportional to the benefits citizens receive form public services, rather than taxes based on the ability to pay. Tiebout’s model implies that any redistribution of income is taken care of by the federal government (Rivkin 2001, p. 207). Despite all the pros of the Tiebout model, various changes in the finance systems of local governments over the last three decades, such as fiscal centralization, work against the establishment of Tiebout effects. This uniformity is undesirable and future reforms should target to encourage a greater diversity of service provision. Competition among local governments, cities and municipalities, as depicted in Tiebout’s model, most at times serve to improve efficiency and delivery of service and goods to the citizens. Based on Tiebout’s model, where there is competition, citizens will come together to take care of all types of demands for public goods and service (Widmer & Zweifel 2008, p. 5). Moreover, individuals will relocate to communities that best meets their demand for public goods and services and the productivity is improved and more efficient since shady and/ ineffective providers of public services and goods will not get any clients. Tiebout model has all the benefits of a competitive market (Feiock 2004, p. 97). According to Tiebout, it is clear that decentralization of provision of public goods and services results in a positive influence on performance. The rationale is that citizens will procure from the providers who give them the best quotient between public service and tax paid. In a study on fiscal equalization, where disparities among local governments and municipalities are mitigated by the central government based on index of monetary potential, findings indicate that such programs induce more disparities they were initially meant to alleviate (Widmer & Zweifel 2008, p. 10). Such fiscal programs are prone to misuse by the politicians. For instance, in a study by Fischer et al. (2003), numerous local governments using such equalization programs tend to allocate significant resources on projects that result in diminutive (and sometimes none at all) economic benefits but boost the popularity of the politicians so as to get incentives and subsidies from the central government (Brueckner 2004, p. 124). Therefore, this a key reason as to why the financial reforms in the future ought to encourage competitiveness and greater diversity of service provision. Centralization of provision of public goods and services, although in its despondency, beseeches the support of the people, it dictates to them; they will act just as those in authority please, as much as they please, and in the direction which they please (Billings 2008, p. 48).. The citizens are expected to take charge of the details without seeking to control the system; they aremost kept in darkness (no transparency), and they may only judge the work by its results later. In the modern times, these are not the circumstances on which the alliance of the citizen’s will can be obtained; conversely, it ought to be free form in its gait and responsible for its acts or the citizen had rather remain passive onlooker than a dependent player in unknowledgeable schemes (Rivkin 2001, p. 217). Such an approach to fiscal policy results in conflicts, inefficiency and waste of public resources. Those conflicts can perhaps be mitigated if there arestronger, shared reforms and commitments to fiscal equivalence and through adoption of measures to ensure the diverse preferences, interests and views of the citizens are taken into consideration. The role of decentralization and the role of competition among local governments are well explained in Tiebout model. The effects of competition are frequentlyacknowledged to function in a market-like style on local government officials. Tiebout effects operate more sturdily on residents. For instance, the sturdiest incentives to uphold values of properties belong to property holders (Billings 2008, p. 76). Tiebout effects therefore arouse citizen participation – civic engagement. The effectiveness of participation depends however, on the governance structure available to citizens. Tiebout effects cannot substitute for local governance carried out through nonmarket arrangements. Another case that demonstrates that the reforms over the last three decades militate against establishment of Tiebout’s effects is the school finance reforms in Michigan. In Michigan, similar to most other states, a considerable percentage of the monetary resources for educational expenses are collected at the local school district level, chiefly through levies charged on property(Widmer & Zweifel 2008, p.15). This dependence on property tax revenues results in bundling of citizens depending on residential and school preferences. Most parents in the Michigan pick out their residences based on the quality of schools in the area. Since, as is frequently maintained, demand for good schools increases with the earnings and education level of the parents, a Tiebout type categorization frequently results (Widmer & Zweifel 2008, p. 17). Families with similar demands mass together, a design that results in segregation of schools in the states based on economic and demographic statuses. The fact that this uniformity is detrimental and future reforms ought to encourage a greater diversity of service provision can be typified in the following case study. Proposal A was a school finance reforms aimed at balancing the finances across all schools within the Michigan state and to break the connection between residence preference and demand for schooling (Widmer & Zweifel 2008, p. 19). The reforms virtually terminated local control over the finances spent by each school. The outcomes of the finance reforms are titillating. Performance of the schools across the state was influential in considerably increasing the levels of expenditure in the lowest-spending areas; the reforms reversed drifts toward higher disparities in expenditures obvious in the immediate pre-reform epoch. Nevertheless, the reforms also limited the schools which were highly spending. The expenditure per pupil in these schools was considerably increasing compared to other schools before the reforms (Widmer & Zweifel 2008, p. 19). The finance reforms restricted their unrestricted control over school expenditure, and, subsequently, the consequent the rates of expenditure in these highest-spending schools were significantlylower than those of other schools. Limitations imposed by the reforms on the highest-spending schools have been correlated to adverse changes in their educational achievement as indicated by the scores in state-run standardized tests. We can conclude that imposition of limitations on a Tiebout system in the form of restrictions on each school’s unrestricted spending power prompted high-spending schools to decrease their efforts, as demonstrated by their reducing the share of resources allocated to basic instruction as well as by declines in teacher salaries. Research findings indicate that the lack of an apparent discretion acted served as a common encumbrance for all schools (Billings 2008, p. 86). High-spending schools ultimately responded to incentives, as evidenced by better results three districts facing stiffer competition compared to high-spending schools with lesser competition. The channeling of monetary resources to the low-spending schools seems to not have motivated the schools spending less to boost their efforts. The inflow of cash into low-spending schools seems not to have motivated them to intensify their academic efforts (Billings 2008, p. 90). In conclusion,the Michigan reforms rate amongst some of the most significant and wide-ranging finance reforms undertaken in the previous forty years. It clearly depicts that future finance reforms ought to take into consideration various uniformities and shows that such reforms ought to seek to boost a grander range of service and public goods provision. This paper demonstrates that fiscal decentralization, as stressed by the Tiebout theory ought to be very well considered when adopting various financial reforms. Findings supported by various study findings indicate that in promising circumstances, wherever the warp of productivity tasks and the distribution of inclinations are equally great, the gains from Tiebout categorization are expected to overshadow the forfeiture from the other financial reforms not supporting the Tiebout’s effects. References Billings, S. B. (2008). Evaluating theTiebout Supply of Local Governments. University of Colorado at Boulder. Brueckner, J. K. (2004) Fiscal Decentralization with Distortionary Taxation: Tiebout vs. Tax Competition. International Tax andPublic Finance, 11, 133–153. Feiock, R. C. (2004). Metropolitan Governance: Conflict, Competition and Cooperation. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press. Rivkin, S. G. (2001) Tiebout Sorting, Aggregation and Estimation of Peer Group Effects. Economics of Education Review 20: 201–209.Retrieved from http://upi-yptk.ac.id/Ekonomi/Rivkin_Tiebout.pdf. Widmer, P. and Zweifel, P. (2008). Provision of Public Goods ina Federalist Country: Tiebout Competition, Fiscal Equalization, and Incentives for Efficiency inSwitzerland. Zurich: University Of Zurich, Socioeconomic Institute. C14: 1-22. Retrieved From Http://Www.Ieb.Ub.Edu/Aplicacio/Fitxers/SS08Widmer.Pdf Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“The System Of Finance For Local Government Essay”, n.d.)
The System Of Finance For Local Government Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/macro-microeconomics/1587865-the-way-the-system-of-finance-for-local-government-has-evolved-over-the-past-30-years-militates-against-the-establishment-of-tiebout-effects-this-uniformity-is-undesirable-and-future-reform-should-seek-to-encourage-a-greater-diversity-of-service-prov
(The System Of Finance For Local Government Essay)
The System Of Finance For Local Government Essay. https://studentshare.org/macro-microeconomics/1587865-the-way-the-system-of-finance-for-local-government-has-evolved-over-the-past-30-years-militates-against-the-establishment-of-tiebout-effects-this-uniformity-is-undesirable-and-future-reform-should-seek-to-encourage-a-greater-diversity-of-service-prov.
“The System Of Finance For Local Government Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/macro-microeconomics/1587865-the-way-the-system-of-finance-for-local-government-has-evolved-over-the-past-30-years-militates-against-the-establishment-of-tiebout-effects-this-uniformity-is-undesirable-and-future-reform-should-seek-to-encourage-a-greater-diversity-of-service-prov.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The System Of Finance For Local Government

Finance for Public Services Managers

However, what must be understood is the fact that all three indicated methods of sources to finance the public services carry their own advantages and disadvantages and it is very critical sometimes that a fine balance need to be striken between all the sources otherwise any mismatch between the income and the expenses of the government can prove fatal for the economy of the country as it can have very detrimental impacts not only on the society but on the economy as well.... Taxes are effective in the sense that they are not only bigger in their scope but also provide the largest chunk of the income sources to the government....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Features of Housing Policy and Finance

Therefore, in severe times, the system always seems to fail.... This paper outlines the government policy agenda, the effect of financial considerations on housing organizations' own policy decisions.... The social housing financial policies thus have a sizeable effect on the degree to which the government's policy agenda is supported.... Thus, the government agenda is highly affected.... This means that when the government's policy agenda is considered, strong support by its social housing financial policies is identified (Lomax, 1996)....
8 Pages (2000 words) Coursework

Advantages and Disadvantages of Tax System

The logic of this proposal is based on the ground that residents should pay for the services they get from the local government.... Taxes are very important to any local government or government since they offer revenue to these governments.... When preparing revenue forecasts, it significant for the local government financial accountants to begin with expenses, not revenues since in this manner, it much easier to predict expenses than expenses....
1 Pages (250 words) Assignment

Discuss the influence of business over local governments services and regulatory activities

This paper will through light on the influence of the business firms on the various activities of the local government's services as well as its regulatory activities (Jonas and Wood, 2013).... Under this regime, the local governments and the regional institutions were allocated with some sort of regulatory powers.... The local governments were entitled to check on the scale and the scope of business activities in their respective local regions (Tucker, 2010)....
11 Pages (2750 words) Essay

Public Sector Finance & Control

Transferring of certain essential services to be catered for by the central government can be a better alternative to managing the council bills, particularly expenditure on education and health.... To achieve the desired council tax band charge for 2012/2013, Calderdale Council should undertake an investigation of homes classified in wrong bands in the 1991 evaluation....
5 Pages (1250 words) Assignment

Public sector finance and control

Revenue for local government primarily comes from council tax, grants from central government funds, business rates, and other fees and charges.... Another issue is through the issuance of local government bond to get more finances to fund the services (Burnham & Horton,2013).... In United Kingdom, taxation entails payment to the two levels of the government, the local government and the central government.... This should also apply Restricting further council tax band D charge will prompt grant from the national government....
5 Pages (1250 words) Assignment

Tourism in Norfolk Virginia

Therefore, one of the public policies that the government of North Virginia can seek to develop and implement is on the methods of improving tourism in the country.... This paper seeks to analyze the various sources of revenue for the government, and how it can fund tourism projects in the city of Norfolk Virginia (Rose, 2000)....
12 Pages (3000 words) Research Paper

Budgetary Practice in the State and Local Governments of the US

The budgeting systems emphasize the methods by which financial decisions are made within the system, together with the way the various types of information are used in budgetary decision making.... ublic budgeting systems involve the state of budgeting throughout all level of the government.... A budget may be defined as the government's plan for the application of public resources to satisfy the needs of the citizens (Lewis, 1988).... This essay analyzes public budgeting system....
5 Pages (1250 words) Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us