StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Economic Approaches and the Practice of Privatization - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
But economists debate as to whether this is actually beneficial to the country’s economy.”
Planned economy or command economy involves a…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.6% of users find it useful
Economic Approaches and the Practice of Privatization
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Economic Approaches and the Practice of Privatization"

PRIVATIZATION ID Foundation Group “The transition from a centrally planned economy to a free market or a mixed economy involves state owned enterprises being privatized. But economists debate as to whether this is actually beneficial to the country’s economy.” Introduction: Planned economy or command economy involves a centralized decision making regarding economic policies, development and investment activities to be governed by a central body ensuring a stable economy, usually the government. It is mostly practiced by economies that call themselves socialist. However, with rapid globalization, growth and development is said to be hampered by such a rigid economic approach. This is because, trade and free market enables investment and diversified markets, which is a favorable for any country’s true growth (Schonhardt-Bailey, 1991, pp. 545--69). This point of view brought into existence other economic structures like mixed economy and free markets. Mixed economies involve the participation of both the government and the private sector whereas free market allows the private sector a free hand with minimal government intervention. When the private sector is given hold of major government held entities, this act is called privatization. This paper sheds light on both the economic approaches and the practice of privatization that results in mixed and open economies. Debate regarding the positive and negative aspects of each and relevant examples will be used to support the point that in the long run, privatization, if done right, is a fruitful and positive step for any economy’s development and growth. Economic Theories: This section will discuss three economic structures and the concept of privatization. The Socialist economy believes that it is imperative that the government has a significant hold in the formulation and implementation of economic policies, so that stability is ensured. The other reason in support for this economic framework is that since the core purpose of such a government is to provide equal amenities to the masses, it needs to be in control of the major utilities that the masses benefit from. Private sector will indulge in profiteering and welfare of the people will be compromised for their benefit. Planned economy gives the government the entire hold over the country’s resources and they have the discretion to set prices, policies and other market dynamics. However, the argument that the government will only focus on the welfare of the people an effective utilization of resources, which will lead to lack of market growth, development and innovation, gave way to the concept of an exactly opposite system; free market economy. Free market economy or open market is a kind of market that has a significant number of private players with minima government restrictions and regulations. This kind of economy is driven by competition and innovation of businesses. Since the main purpose of every business in this kind of economy is profiteering, they indulge in research and development in order to come up with unique products and services that have a USP that provides value to the customers and the company, a portion of their customer’s pockets. Businesses compete head-on, giving the market same or superior products and making the most use of the lack of regulations that can hamper their profiteering otherwise. That being said, free markets tend to be volatile and risky because of the lack of government intervention and a central body to regulate the markets. As this can be troublesome for any country’s economy, this concept was further modifies into another economic system called mixed economy, which embodied characteristics of both planned and free markets. Mixed economy, like the name suggests, gives the private sector some hold over the market. The government too plays a significant role of formulating basic economic policies that have o be broadly followed by the private sector. The government intervention is an imperative aspect so that the private sector does not exploit the people in order to accomplish their organizational goals. The government does not give up the control over areas that can affect the welfare of the people or the markets. For examples, military, national and international trade bodies etc. the extent of government’s hold over the market is decided by the masses as well. This kind of market supports innovation and growth, however, there are several risks involves like too much power given to the private sector, government’s favoritism towards one sector, lack of regulations to hamper debt burden and market stability etc. however, in this day and age, every country needs to indulge in trade and development. Compared to entirely planned or free markets, this kind of economy has the greatest tendency to adapt to global market changes, induce innovation in businesses, allowing government intervention leading to relatively controlled growth and development. These characteristics make it the most feasible and widely practiced economic structures today. Privatization is the act of the government giving up the ownership of a public owned/welfare company to the private sector (Savas, 1987). The government has several entities to look into and this can lead to stagnant organizational development for each one. If a private firm is given the ownership of such an entity, they will make more effective use of resources to ensure productivity, efficiency and innovation, leading to the provision of quality services to the masses. However, there is always a chance that the private firm may not be able to handle such a big business efficiently and its unproductivity can have a massive impact on the general public and markets. Thus, this too is a much debated practice with several examples available of it having gone right and wrong. State Ownership and Privatization in China In the wake of the state-owned enterprises reforms in China in the late 1970’s, the practice of privatization was introduces. Initially resisted due to its implications of lay-offs and possible inefficiency, the privatization process slowly made its way into the Chinese economy, however, the Chinese model of mixed economy was a hybrid one. It allowed the existence of private sector participants in the same markets as with the SOEs. If they were competingwell and the SOE couldn’t be maintained due to the presence of powerful competitors, it was dissolved eventually. This has proved to be a successful move as it allowed private sector to innovate and prove superior operations in order to be allowed to rule the market entirely. The government did not give up its hold on strategic businesses like transportation, utilities, energy etc. and has significant share in the top businesses in the country (Kwan, 2005, pp. 58--74). In this way, it still dominates the market and ensures that the people are not exploited for their basic necessities in the name of privatization. The SOE sustain them by selling shares in public stock exchanges, selling shares to the company’s management or by handing over state assets to local holdings. These companies are then called Town and Village Enterprises (TVEs). Thus, by dividing them into smaller portions on a smaller scale they tend to function better. In March 2003, State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission (SASAC) were formed to manage the government held enterprises (Knowledgeatwharton.com.cn, 2014). However, even though the government claims that the SOE are doing well, the fact remains that most of the profits are made by only a handful of SOE and the others are performing poorly. The private sector in china is doing well in terms of innovation and growth but they too, are not able to do sufficiently in the long run due to lack of constitutional laws to protect them and weak capital markets. Thus, the process of privatization has a long way to go in China. The government needs to ensure an environment that is feasible for the private enterprises and let go of some loss-making enterprises to the private sector so that they can be better managed. State Ownership and Privatization in Russia: Russia has had a rather harsh experience of privatization which took place on a mass scale after the fall of the Soviet Union. The major public welfare entities like power and energy were given into the hands of private firms. However, this was not a step taken strategically and as a result this hasty decision led to the accumulation of wealth-and power- in the hands of a few people. These people, called tycoons, took advantage of their positions as the major holders of public property and reaped unduebenefits. Massive lay-offs and price hikes in necessities resulted in in the economic meltdown and the disparity between the rich and the poor widened significantly and a wide-spread political unrest resulted. This phase of privatization was an eye-opener and lesson for the other countries. China too, has been reprehensive of societal collapse as result of privatization. The Russian case study re-enforced the need of a strategic framework under which privatization should take place. Laws that bind the performance and re-structuring of key public welfare entities are imperative for the success of this practice (Sondhof, 1999, pp. 233--240). Russia still struggles with privatization policies and the supportive legal and infrastructural framework that has to be ensured to support it. Conclusion: In conclusion, mixed economies are ideal if there is a strategic blend of public and private participation. The government has to ensure that the major stakes in strategic sectors are in its hands, and that the market can be controlled. If privatization is in process, there has to be strong legal and financial structure to support it. There should be laws governing the unjust use of resources and exploitation of the masses in the name of profiteering. Certain benchmarks and goals can be proposed by the government to ensure efficiency in the working if these privatized entities. China shows a slow and conservative move towards privatization but it has to eventually give up the loss-bearing entities to the private sector or strategicallyinvest in its growth. Russia has to ensure a strategic framework embodying the essential aspects that can support its privatization move. Mixed economy and the practice of privatization, prevail in several countries worldwide like the United States. This gives governments ample examples to study and implement in order to make the system work positively for themselves. The final aim should be the provision of goods and services equally, efficient use of resources and welfare to the masse References: Sondhof, H. 1999. Privatisation policy in Russia. Intereconomics, 34 (5), pp. 233--240. Knowledgeatwharton.com.cn. 2014. The Road to Privatization in China - Knowledge@Wharton. [online] Available at: http://www.knowledgeatwharton.com.cn/index.cfm?fa=viewfeature&articleid=138 2&languageid=1 [Accessed: 24 Jan 2014]. Savas, E. S. 1987. Privatization the key to better government. Chatham: Chatham House. Kwan, C. 2005. The reform of state-owned enterprises in China: The groundwork for privatization needs to be laid urgently. Nomura Capital Market Review, 8 (2), pp. 58--74. Schonhardt-Bailey, C. 1991. SPECIFIC FACTORS, CAPITAL MARKETS, PORTFOLIO DIVERSIFICATION, AND FREE TRADE Domestic Determinants of the Repeal. World Politics, 43 pp. 545--69. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(The transition from a centrally planned economy to a free market or a Coursework - 3, n.d.)
The transition from a centrally planned economy to a free market or a Coursework - 3. https://studentshare.org/macro-microeconomics/1806641-the-transition-from-a-centrally-planned-economy-to-a-free-market-or-a-mixed-economy-involves-state-owned-enterprises-being-privatised-but-economists-debate-as-to-whether-this-is-actually-beneficial-to-the-countrys-economy-discuss-this-statement-fr
(The Transition from a Centrally Planned Economy to a Free Market or a Coursework - 3)
The Transition from a Centrally Planned Economy to a Free Market or a Coursework - 3. https://studentshare.org/macro-microeconomics/1806641-the-transition-from-a-centrally-planned-economy-to-a-free-market-or-a-mixed-economy-involves-state-owned-enterprises-being-privatised-but-economists-debate-as-to-whether-this-is-actually-beneficial-to-the-countrys-economy-discuss-this-statement-fr.
“The Transition from a Centrally Planned Economy to a Free Market or a Coursework - 3”. https://studentshare.org/macro-microeconomics/1806641-the-transition-from-a-centrally-planned-economy-to-a-free-market-or-a-mixed-economy-involves-state-owned-enterprises-being-privatised-but-economists-debate-as-to-whether-this-is-actually-beneficial-to-the-countrys-economy-discuss-this-statement-fr.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Economic Approaches and the Practice of Privatization

What can Nigeria learn from the previous mistakes in electricity liberalisation

The primary objective of privatization is to increase government efficiency1.... Nonetheless, given the previous history of government participation in services and goods production in Nigeria, and the prevalent history of crisis in these public enterprises, the process of privatization in Nigeria has various expected objectives.... Despite the variation and the somewhat unclear meaning, privatization has unequivocal political objectives and origins....
16 Pages (4000 words) Research Paper

Transitional Economy of Azerbaijan

The paper reflects on the privatization of the organizations, land ownership and trade facilities.... The objective of this paper is to focus the economic conditions prevailing within Azerbaijan with due significance to its economic reforms and state programs.... The transitional economy is a kind of economic system which is currently identified to witness a continuously developing phase altering from being highly centralized towards the construction of a free market structure....
13 Pages (3250 words) Research Paper

Why is privatizing social security in the USA a bad thing

The privatization of social security in the above country has been highly promoted using the following argument: that such initiative would result to the increase of the effectiveness of the social security framework, an argument though that it is not verified in practice, as analyzed further below.... Different approaches have been used in order to explain the inappropriateness of the privatization of social security in US.... According to Ritzer and Atalay, the privatization of social security in US has been supported by various organizations and individuals but the completion of the relevant task has been proved quite challenging because it ‘is politically controversial' (Ritzer and Atalay 130)....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

What are the Limits, if Any, to the Privatisation of the Welfare State

What are the limits, if any, to the privatisation of the welfare state?... The central issue considered in this essay concentrates on the privatisation of the welfare state.... The essay will therefore examine the definition of privatisation as perceived by scholars.... ... ... ... This will lead into the history of privatisation and further examine the concept's development as a functional phenomenon in the welfare state....
15 Pages (3750 words) Essay

The Electricity Reforms in Chile

privatization on a massive scale started in 1986.... The macro economy and most of the major economic indicators started to indicate substantial improvement.... This healthy economic trend grew further during the late 1980s and accelerated further to 6....
15 Pages (3750 words) Essay

Dissertation: Life after privatisation; A British Energy perspective

The need for financial This paper examines the privatization of British Energy, the major British Energy Supplier as of its reasons, its aspects and its effects to the supply chain.... More specifically, the issue under consideration is whether the changes caused to the British Energy's supply chain after its privatization led to a positive or a negative result for the whole corporate entity....
40 Pages (10000 words) Essay

Identify Savas Four strategies of privatization

This research paper provides Savas' four philosophical approaches and strategies of how to achieve privatization.... Savas, a renowned privatization advocate, views the act as a calculated measure to enhance public management (Holzer & Lee, 2004).... Savas, a renowned privatization advocate, views the act as a calculated measure to enhance public management (Holzer & Lee, 2004).... ntroductionThere is no unanimous agreement on the set of words to define privatization....
2 Pages (500 words) Research Paper

Impacts of Privatization in Russian Political Status

This research paper "Impacts of privatization in Russian Political Status" presents privatization as a common practice in Russia and which has to some extent improved the economic status of the nation hence making it easier for the government to run its operations.... The chief social goals of the first program of privatization involved the distribution of the former properties owned by the state on the basis of social justice and generating a massive middle class under private ownership considered to be important for social and political stability (Rutland 830-867)....
13 Pages (3250 words) Research Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us