StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Communications in Coca-Cola Amatil - Case Study Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper 'Communications in Coca-Cola Amatil" is a good example of a management case study. Coca-Cola Amatil is one of the largest non-alcoholic company that is located in the Asian Pacific Region. It incorporates six countries that include Papua New Guinea, Indonesia, Samoa, Fiji, Australia and New Zealand…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.7% of users find it useful

Extract of sample "Communications in Coca-Cola Amatil"

Coca Cola Amatil Name Institution Name Date Coca Cola Amatil is one of the largest non-alcoholic company that is located in Asian Pacific Region. It incorporates in six countries that include Papua New Guinea, Indonesia, Samoa, Fiji, Australia and New Zealand. The company borrows its approach in doing business from the Coca Cola Company. The company was established in 1904 but bought the Coca Cola franchise later own to produce and supply numerous Coca Cola related products. The purpose of this paper is to review the Coca Cola Amatil business operations relative to the wider Coca Cola operations and other components that define the way business is done. Pesticide contamination has been reported in numerous regions (Visvanathan et al., 2004). For example, the Centre for Sciences and Environment, which is a non-governmental organisation that is located in New Delhi, attributes the soft drink company with containmanition of its products (Holland & Ramsay, 2003). Some of the contaminants include chlorpyrifos, malathion, DDT and lindane (Levy & Tapsell, 2007). These pesticides have been associated with immune system and cancer. The contamination has been attributed in India and it is estimated that the pollutants are 30 times more serious when compared to the residues in America (Cuganesan, Guthrie & Ward, 2010). After the production of the report, the Asian representative of the company alleged that the CSE was against its brand, and it attributes to “brandjacking” (Dorling, Scott & Deakins, 2006). In 2004, the parliament in India backed the findings of CSEs (Visvanathan et al., 2004). A committee was established and reviewed numerous drinks include Pepsi products and decided that the contamination based on the pesticides was a major issue (Levy & Tapsell, 2007). On the other hand, Coca Cola has continued to say that its plants employ a distinctive strategy that removes potential contaminants (Holland & Ramsay, 2003). The technology ensures that the health standards are upheld but the revenue and sales decreased immensely after passage of the resolutions (Wu et al., 2006). Moreover, some sections in India have banned consumption of Coca Cola such as in the state of Kerala (Dorling, Scott & Deakins, 2006). However, the High Court revoked the ban and said the federal government had prerogative to ban food products (Seow & Thong, 2005). In 2004 and in the state of Kerala, a bottling plant was closed because the plant was attributed with decline of quality and quantity of water that was available to both the villagers and farmers. The Coca Cola company appealed and the Kerala High Court in 2005 refused the directive. The decision was premised on the fact that the low amounts of water were attributed to shortfall of rainfall (Dorling, Scott & Deakins, 2006). The Kerala jurisdiction appealed and the case is still in courts waiting for its determination. The Indian government especially in five or six states have controlled the supply and consumption of Coca Cola products (Cuganesan, Guthrie & Ward, 2010). For example, Mr. V. Kamson who was Gangainondan panchayat had continuously advocated for banning of Coca Cola products. He categorically said that he was under pressure from the police, the public and other stakeholders. His campaigns and from other stakeholders resulted in partial bans of consumption of the soft drink in some hospitals, colleges and schools. Another environmental concern is about the packaging. Reports have indicated that Coca Cola’s packaging process affects the environment. However, the company has continued to oppose these accusations and have advocated on measures associated with container deposit legislation (Cuganesan, Guthrie & Ward, 2010). Coca Cola has continued to influence the decision making and other legislatives through lobbying interested parties. Economically, Coca Cola has faced numerous issues. For example, in 2000, PepsiCo had filled a suit accusing Coca Cola having monopoly in dispensation of the soft drink in United States (Dorling, Scott & Deakins, 2006). In addition, the European Opinion in 2005 ended numerous deals with Coca Cola because of stifling competition. Coca Cola used to stock bars and shops and this process was seen as a monopoly. In 2005, Coca Cola Mexico branch was fined because of unfair commercial practices. Coca Cola has appealed the case and waits its determination (Levy & Tapsell, 2007). In 2008, there was a lawsuit that was brought by shareholder based on “channel stuffing” settlement. Coca Cola was forced to pay $137.5 million at the Northern District of Georgia since the acquisitions since the company had forced the producers to purchase unnecessary beverage concentrates with the purpose of increasing its sales. The investors went to the courts based open the aspect of “channel stuffing”. The strategy was also attributed to creating a false image about the company’s financial health (Visvanathan et al., 2004). In 1938, Coca Cola entered South Africa and capitalised on apartheid South Africa regime (Cuganesan, Guthrie & Ward, 2010). The government of South Africa had championed apartheid policy that favoured some sections of the country and Coca Cola grew immensely (Holland & Ramsay, 2003). The racial oppression and discrimination increased the Coca Cola sales since it was a monopoly company in South Africa (Dorling, Scott & Deakins, 2006). The company employed 4,500 workers but the employees had to endure wages, workplace policy, housing and other factors associated with segregation and other pollicises that were against ethnicity. The situation in South Africa was worse and in 1982, the trade union played an important role in changing how black people operated. The union and the community supported two work stoppages that resulted in creation of bargain system with the union resulting in Coca Cola changing some policies (Dorling, Scott & Deakins, 2006). For example, Coca Cola divulged about the pension fund and also increase in wages for the employees (Visvanathan et al., 2004). The Coca Cola approach is South Africa resulted in numerous boycotts in California, Penns State and Tennessee State. The slogan was “Coke Free Campus “and the demonstrations also occurred at Coca Cola headquarters. Even though there are numerous complains about Coca Cola in South African, Coca Cola has continuously invested in sustain the requirements and expectations of the South Africa (Cuganesan, Guthrie & Ward, 2010). For example, in 1986, Coca Cola donated $10 million to improve education and housing requirements of South Africa black population. In addition, Coca Cola introduced different approaches and perspectives to the way the business was operated (Visvanathan et al., 2004). Through the processes, Coca Cola increased its market share even though employing some strategic measures. It has resulted in increase of market share in South Africa and other countries across the world. Stakeholders and the society has benefited through the corporate social responsibility. The corporate social responsibility has an important foundation called Coca Cola Foundation (Dorling, Scott & Deakins, 2006). The Foundation provides support to the society through contribution to the society (Visvanathan et al., 2004). For example, Coca Cola has funded numerous social aspects in the region where it operates. Coca Cola has contributed to the welfare of the society through funding education and research, which are important to the society (Cuganesan, Guthrie & Ward, 2010). Many students across the world has benefited immensely through the educational support and other support to the learning institutions (Dunne, 2008). Coca Cola has also contributed to the society through the one percent profit distribution to the society (Holland & Ramsay, 2003). The annual profits are given to the society to sustain the important requirements of the society. The shareholders have continued to benefit from revenues generated from its products and services (Cuganesan, Guthrie & Ward, 2010). The strategic and management policies have contributed positively towards the way the company operates and has continuously fulfilled its strategic requirements (Holland & Ramsay, 2003). The shareholders have benefited economically and investments-wise through the strategic decisions. The government has also benefited from the taxes and employment opportunities that Coca Cola has created and generated (Dorling, Scott & Deakins, 2006). In conclusion, Coca Cola has received numerous criticisms in the way it approaches its business requirements. The issues revolve on environment and economic-society aspects. The business process in India has resulted in numerous problems in the way Coca Cola operates. Coca Cola business process has resulted in court battles with the people. In addition, the government in some states have instituted measures and policies that ban supply of the soft drinks to hospitals, colleges and schools. In South Africa, Coca Cola employed racial policies and the operation of the businesses at that time were against the black community. The community received merge salaries compared to other people working in the same company. In addition, the compensation and other benefits did not favour the requirements of the community and employees. Nevertheless, Coca Cola has continued to support the requirements of the society and the government in forms of social responsibility. Coca Cola supports the requirements of the community in terms of educational support, and other processes that are important to the community. References Cuganesan, S., Guthrie, J., & Ward, L. (2010, December). Examining CSR disclosure strategies within the Australian food and beverage industry. In Accounting Forum (Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 169-183). Elsevier. Dorling, K., Scott, J., & Deakins, E. (2006). Determinants of successful vendor managed inventory relationships in oligopoly industries. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 36(3), 176-191. Dunne, A. J. (2008). The impact of an organization's collaborative capacity on its ability to engage its supply chain partners. British Food Journal, 110(4/5), 361-375. Holland, D., & Ramsay, A. (2003). Do Australian companies manage earnings to meet simple earnings benchmarks?. Accounting & Finance, 43(1), 41-62. Levy, G., & Tapsell, L. (2007). Shifts in purchasing patterns of non‐alcoholic, water‐based beverages in Australia, 1997–2006. Nutrition & Dietetics, 64(4), 268-279. Seow, W. K., & Thong, K. M. (2005). Erosive effects of common beverages on extracted premolar teeth. Australian Dental Journal, 50(3), 173-178. Visvanathan, R., Chen, R., Horowitz, M., & Chapman, I. (2004). Blood pressure responses in healthy older people to 50 g carbohydrate drinks with differing glycaemic effects. British journal of nutrition, 92(02), 335-340. Wu, K. L., Chaikomin, R., Doran, S., Jones, K. L., Horowitz, M., & Rayner, C. K. (2006). Artificially sweetened versus regular mixers increase gastric emptying and alcohol absorption. The American journal of medicine, 119(9), 802-804. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Communications in Coca-Cola Amatil Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words, n.d.)
Communications in Coca-Cola Amatil Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words. https://studentshare.org/management/2083687-communications-in-co
(Communications in Coca-Cola Amatil Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words)
Communications in Coca-Cola Amatil Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words. https://studentshare.org/management/2083687-communications-in-co.
“Communications in Coca-Cola Amatil Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words”. https://studentshare.org/management/2083687-communications-in-co.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Communications in Coca-Cola Amatil

Datasquirt Ltd Company Analysis

Some of the main customers for Data squirt's software solutions are Fontena, coca-cola armatil, Amiway, Silver jet as well as Royal Bank of Scotland.... Its activities are basically, contact centers, multichannel non-voice communications as well as the social media....
9 Pages (2250 words) Case Study

Marketing Strategies That Can Bbe Implemented by The Rockwell Beverage Co

… The paper "Marketing Strategies That Can Be Implemented by The Rockwell Beverage Co " is an outstanding example of a marketing case study.... nbsp;The present paper seeks to devise appropriate marketing strategies that can be implemented by The Rockwell Beverage Co in order to get a market share for its soft drink- Everyday Sunday newly introduced in the Australian market....
6 Pages (1500 words) Case Study

Experience Working at Coca-Cola Amatil, Australia

coca-cola amatil employees have between 1000-5000 employees across its various departments which include customer service, Finance, Human Resource Management, IT&T, Supply Chain and Sales and Marketing (Isdell & Beasley 2012).... … The paper "Experience Working at Coca Cola amatil, Australia" is a perfect example of a management case study.... The paper "Experience Working at Coca Cola amatil, Australia" is a perfect example of a management case study....
8 Pages (2000 words) Case Study

Coca-Cola Successful Brand Equity

… The paper "coca-cola Successful Brand Equity" is a good example of a marketing case study.... nbsp;coca-cola is the world's leading brand and most valuable brand worth billions of dollars and a household name.... coca-cola has achieved brand equity through innovative ways of marketing that are known as total brand management.... The paper "coca-cola Successful Brand Equity" is a good example of a marketing case study....
6 Pages (1500 words) Case Study

The Australian Institute of Project Management - Gala Dinner

… The paper 'The Australian Institute of Project Management - Gala Dinner " is a good example of a management case study.... The Australian Institute of Project Management (AIPM) 25th National Conference will be held In October 2015.... It will be a two-day event, and it will take place at the Melbourne Exhibition centre with an estimated 5000 delegates expected to attend....
11 Pages (2750 words) Case Study

Organization Behavior in Coca Cola Company

… The paper “Organization Behavior in Coca Cola Company ”  is a  motivating example of a case study on human resources.... Organizational ethical behavior can affect the organization in many different ways; it can affect the organization's reputation, productivity, and other external and internal factors that an organization operates under....
7 Pages (1750 words) Case Study

Coca-Cola Amatil Downsizes Cans to Increase Sales

… The paper "coca-cola amatil Downsizes Cans to Increase Sales " is a perfect example of a micro and macroeconomic case study.... The paper "coca-cola amatil Downsizes Cans to Increase Sales " is a perfect example of a micro and macroeconomic case study.... coca-cola company intends to reduce its packaging bottle to 200 ml.... In recent months, coca-cola production and sales have been declining.... coca-cola company intends to reduce its packaging bottle to 200 ml....
8 Pages (2000 words) Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us