StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Moral Ethics and Treatments That Enhance the Mental and Physical Human Capabilities of Patients - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
This essay "Moral Ethics and Treatments That Enhance the Mental and Physical Human Capabilities of Patients" focuses on gene therapy, an experimental technique that utilizes genes to prevent or treat disease. It will allow doctors to treat a medical disorder by inserting a gene…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95% of users find it useful
Moral Ethics and Treatments That Enhance the Mental and Physical Human Capabilities of Patients
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Moral Ethics and Treatments That Enhance the Mental and Physical Human Capabilities of Patients"

Moral ethics and treatments that enhance the mental and physical human capabilities of patients Gene therapy and moral ethics Introduction Gene-therapy is an experimental technique that utilizes the genes to prevent or treat disease (Burley and Harris, 2002). Researchers assert that gene-therapy will allow the doctors to treat a medical disorder by inserting a gene in the patient’s body cells instead of using the traditional methods of surgery or drugs (Wartburg and Liew, 1999). Some of the approaches of gene-therapy include replacing the mutated gene that is responsible for the disease with a healthy gene (Becker, 2000). Another approach entails inserting a new gene in the body in order to fight the existing disease and also inactivating the mutated gene that is responsible for the disease (Burley and Harris, 2002). Abnormal genes will be replaced with normal and well functioning genes through homologous combination while selective reverse mutation will ensure that abnormal genes will return to the normal function (Sandel, 2007). Spindle transfer approach will ensure that the entire mitochondrion that is defective is replaced with normal mitochondria. Basically, there are two types of gene therapy that are Somatic gene therapy and Genetic gene therapy. Somatic gene therapy entails the transfer of genes in the somatic cells of the patient except the undifferentiated stem cells (Burley and Harris, 2002). On the other hand, Genetic gene therapy entails modification of the cells including the sperm cells of the patient and these genes become inheritable by the offspring of the patients thus preventing the passage of the disease to the offspring (Becker, 2000). Gene therapy has attracted intense ethical debate and controversy with the opponents asserting that it is not natural while the proponents assert that it improves the living standards of the patient and offspring (Wartburg and Liew, 1999). According to Aristotle’ ethical theory, all the scientific technique must aim at certain good and there is absolutely one final end of all sciences. The absolute end of sciences should be happiness which all sub-ends aim at attaining (Wartburg and Liew, 1999). In this case, Aristotle ethical theory is clear that happiness entails thriving life and living well. Accordingly, happiness of patients encompasses the external goods that include wholesome children and personal beauty (Burley and Harris, 2002). According to Aristotle, gene-therapy is necessary since it leads to high standards of health care thus leading to happy patients and wholesome children (Vaughn, 2009). Accordingly, the death of a patient will cause unhappiness to the friends and close family members thus doctors should conduct gene-therapy in order to save the life of the patient (Kelly, 2007). Human beings have the intellectual capacity to research and develop scientific technologies that are essential in improving the health and well being of the population such as the gene therapy (Becker, 2000). However, opponents of Aristotle argue that gene therapy is not virtuous since it may later lead to unhappiness on the patient (Giacca, 2010). Opponents of this argument assert that gene therapy has problems with viral-vectors and patients may suffer from inflammatory responses and toxicity in their after some time. In addition, most occurring medical complications such as high blood pressure and arthritis can be attributed to gene therapy since it combines a variation of the natural gene combination (Giacca, 2010). Aristotle claims that a virtuous person will aim at the mean and virtues are concerned with actions and emotions. Virtues are determined by reasons and prudent individuals such as doctors have the capacity to determine a virtue (Burley and Harris, 2002). Virtue ethics does not emphasize on any particular consequences or rules of behaviour, but focuses on the moral virtues of the actor (Giacca, 2010). It considers the innate character traits of the actor such as generosity and courage of the person. Doctors are expected to display compassion and care for the life of the patients, and at the same time resist any desires or passions that may harm the health of the patient. Genetically, making alterations to the genes leads to enhancements in cognition, mood and body strength (Kelly, 2007). However, the controversy lies on whether individuals are ethical in trying to make their life ‘more perfect’ through use of gene therapy. It is unethical to use gene therapy in improving the abilities of an individual. Unlike natural ability enhancers such a coffee that increases the brain alertness and body stamina, gene therapy should not be used to enhance the brain function since it is not natural (Burley and Harris, 2002). Gene therapy leads to a more personalized patient care unlike the drugs that are not intended to treat a specific medical problem (Kelly, 2007). Drugs and surgeries are not efficient since they are manufactured and designed for the whole population, unlike gene therapy that treats the exact unique problem of the patient (Burley and Harris, 2002). In addition, the freedom of choice and liberty is essential and patients should have a choice of their preferred mode of treatment. Parents are morally right in controlling the modifying the genetic composition of their children before they are born. Accordingly, the offspring will not suffer from any negative trait thus will escape bullying or low self-esteem when interacting with their peers (Giacca, 2010). Proponents of gene-therapy argue that it may be the only method of treating certain diseases or preventing the unavoidable illnesses. For instance, the individuals with a family history of genetic diseases can be screened and treated with gene-therapy through inserting a new gene in order to prevent the individual from developing the illness in his later age (Burley and Harris, 2002). Somatic gene-therapy will help in correcting the diseases where traditional medical care procedures such as surgery or drugs have failed (Vaughn, 2009). Doctors are bound to provide the highest possible medical care to the patient thus this technology will lead to elimination of diseases such as immunodeficiency, hemophilia and color blindness (Kelly, 2007). In addition, gene-therapy strengthens the immune system of the body unlike use of drugs that contains chemicals and toxins that have adverse body reactions thus weakening the body immune system (Giacca, 2010). The opponents of gene therapy assert that it is unnatural since individuals lose the giftedness. Religious groups argue that doctors should not play the role of God by attempting to create a new scientific type of human being (Sandel, 2007). In addition, gene therapy will create two distinct social classes since some people have no access to gene therapy. This technology will interfere with the equality of all human beings since it cannot fulfill the desire of every human individual (Giacca, 2010). Accordingly, gene therapy diminishes the moral virtue of caring for others and perpetuates the attitudes of rejecting the human life in its normal and natural form. The virtues of humility and responsibility will also be diminished by gene therapy since individuals in the society will move away from accepting their genetic composition as a unique talent or gift (Kelly, 2007). This technology will pressurize the society to take more look for genetic traits that lead to success thus diminishing the ethical virtues of helping and caring for the less fortunate in the society because individuals will be more responsible for their own success (Kelly, 2007). According to consequentialism ethics, the final outcomes of gene therapy may be adverse to the patient health. Some medical researchers have pointed out that gene therapy may induce tumor if it is integrated in the wrong place. For instance, the new genes may interfere with the functioning of the tumor-suppressor genes (Vaughn, 2009). In addition, previous clinical trials have confirmed that X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency (X-SCID) patients have a higher likelihood of developing tumor after gene therapy. All the foreign genes that are introduced in the human tissue will lead to hyper stimulation of the immune system ultimately reducing the effectiveness of gene therapy (Vaughn, 2009). Introduction of gene therapy paves was for the slippery slope since researchers will look for advanced and unethical technologies of curing natural disorders such as poor eyesight and baldness (Sandel, 2007). In this regard, doctors may ignore the value of ethics in their professions thus leading to diminishment of quality of patient health care (Sandel, 2007). Opponents of gene therapy assert that using gene therapy is not a curative method, but a form of trying to enhance the ability and capacity of human beings. They assert human beings have for long lived a normal lifestyle even with disabilities thus no artificial enhancement is necessary (Giacca, 2010). Another critical argument against germ line therapy is that future generations should be accorded the opportunity to decide their health status. Germ line gene therapy affects thousands of future descendants thus leading to change in the general human being capabilities. Gene therapy should only be used for curing diseases and not enhancing the human capabilities such as intelligent (Vaughn, 2009). Conclusion In my opinion, I believe that gene therapy should be permissible in the treatment of diseases such as cystic fibroids and not enhancing the genetic traits of the offspring. Doctors should not create an illusion that gene therapy can enhance the brain functioning and make human beings live an above average lifestyle relative to normal individual. It is the duty of the doctors to provide the patients with information of the multiple types of treatments and their weaknesses. In addition, doctors should strive to ensure that patients attain the highest possible standard of health care. Reference list: Becker, G.K. 2000. The moral status of persons” perspectives on bioethics. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Burley, J and Harris, J. (2002). A companion to genethics. Malden: Blackwell Publishers. Giacca, M. 2010. Gene therapy. New York: Springer. Kelly, E.B. 2007. Gene therapy. Westport, CT. Greenwood press. Sandel, M.J. 2007. The case against perfection: ethics in the age of genetic engineering. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Vaughn, L. 2009. Contemporary moral arguments: readings in ethical issues.Oxford: Oxford University Press. Wartburg, W.P and Liew, J. 1999. Gene technology and social acceptance. Lanhalm: University Press of America. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Is it morally defensible for doctors to offer treatments that will Essay”, n.d.)
Is it morally defensible for doctors to offer treatments that will Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1618945-is-it-morally-defensible-for-doctors-to-offer-treatments-that-will-enhance-human-capabilities-mental-or-physical-discuss
(Is It Morally Defensible for Doctors to Offer Treatments That Will Essay)
Is It Morally Defensible for Doctors to Offer Treatments That Will Essay. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1618945-is-it-morally-defensible-for-doctors-to-offer-treatments-that-will-enhance-human-capabilities-mental-or-physical-discuss.
“Is It Morally Defensible for Doctors to Offer Treatments That Will Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1618945-is-it-morally-defensible-for-doctors-to-offer-treatments-that-will-enhance-human-capabilities-mental-or-physical-discuss.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Moral Ethics and Treatments That Enhance the Mental and Physical Human Capabilities of Patients

Legal, Ethical and Professional Issues

The aim of this study is to examine the professional, ethical and legal issues of which a qualified nurse should consider when dealing with a patient's dignity; to discuss social and cultural issues, confidentiality in respect of patients' information.... From this resaerch it is clear that there are quite a few healthcare practices that deprive the dignity of patients by treating them as ingenuous, dependent and inane beings.... As such, the NMC Code of Professional Conduct requires nurses to document and systematically assess the physical, psychological, social and spiritual needs of patients, clients and communities (McSherry & Ross 2010)....
21 Pages (5250 words) Essay

Prolonging Life vs Natural Death Outline

This debate considers prolonging life a valuable right of individuals protected both by law and by moral ethics in existing societies.... In spite of poor rational capabilities and consciousness possibly exhibited by patients in critical units, their ability to feel is still presumed intact, as such, sanctity of preserving such exclusive attribute is one of the things to be protected.... Prolonging life is never of limited resources Current medical reports demonstrated less significant difference, in terms of cost-containment, in limiting life support utilization for sustenance of critical patients compared with restricting life support utilization as adherence to bedside rationing to priority patients (Luce & White, 2007)....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

What Exactly Is a Moral Dilemma

What exactly is a 'moral dilemma', and does one face it in everyday life A 'moral dilemma' is a situation where here is conflict and where an agent regards himself as being completely morally justified in doing what he is doing, while at the same time, carrying out the second option of the situation where he is in may not be possible.... The most crucial factor of a moral dilemma is therefore that the agent is required to carry out each of the two actions, the agent can carry out each of the actions, and the agent cannot perform both the actions....
21 Pages (5250 words) Essay

Ethics of Advocacy in Nursing Practice

This essay, Role of The Nurse, discusses that the nursing professional performs many roles in the care of patients.... physical and radiological examination suggested that there was internal abdominal haemorrhage that would require immediate surgical intervention.... Patient advocacy by nursing professionals has the tendency to enhance inter-professional conflicts in healthcare and yet, as advocacy is an integral part of nursing, the nursing professional has to stand up for these rights of the patient and expect support from the healthcare system....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

A written analysis of the ethical dilemma

On one hand, their professional philosophy, in particular, suggests them to perform certain acts that are aimed at serving best interests of patients and on the other, the broad humanist outlook prevents them from performing those acts.... Thus, remaining within the limits of a professional boundary, as sensitive as healthcare services, it really becomes tough for professionals to assimilate both these sides and churn out a constructive decision that would fulfill best interest of patients....
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay

Medical Ethics in Palliative Care

The setting in which it most frequently arises is in palliative care where many patients spend the last days of their lives under medical care without any hope of recovery only awaiting what is assumed to be a certain death.... In some cases, patients in this situations or their family may request that treatment is stopped or that the patient is given a lethal dosage or drugs such as morphine to “save” them from pain.... This paper will discuss the importance of sanctity of life through several arguments against euthanasia for patients undergoing palliative care and then examining and disproving some of the opposing views that have been used to trivialize sanctity by pointing out their underlying weakness with a view to prove that; irrespective of the intentions, euthanasia is morally and medically unjustifiable....
15 Pages (3750 words) Essay

Medical Ethics and the Legal Framework: Chester versus Afshar the English Tort Law Cases

This paper will explore what lies behind informed consent versus disclosure and the terms governing it directed by medical ethics and the legal framework.... For instance, one could take a nurse as an advocate for her patients who at a moment collide with prioritized tasks such as resource allocation, diagnosis or treatments guided by the principles of contract, misrepresentation and regulation.... here will be instances where a doctor will work better aware of the medical ethics involved although not declaring one as ethicists (Beauchamp and Childress 2009)....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

Psychosocial Aspects in Discharging Decision in Physical Therapy

These psychological expectations put the PT in a difficult position, especially when it comes to discharging issues when patients fail to meet their goals.... This paper discusses psychosocial aspects in discharging decision in physical therapy.... physical therapists can work in hospitals, private clinics, out-patient clinics, home-based therapies, educational institutions, sports and fitness facilities, work/office settings and nursing homes (APTA, 2009)....
18 Pages (4500 words) Research Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us