StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The Circle of Intellectuals Kuhns Concept of Paradigms - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper presents different views on philosophy of science. Karl Popper views that science is rational and is open to criticism. It is open-minded, flexible and ready to accept falsification. Kuhn has the opposite opinion. According to him, science is not rational but it is dogmatic and intransigent…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.2% of users find it useful
The Circle of Intellectuals Kuhns Concept of Paradigms
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "The Circle of Intellectuals Kuhns Concept of Paradigms"

?Philosophy of Science “Philosophy of science is concerned with the assumptions, foundations methods and implications of science.” (Wikipedia) Many scientist propounded different views on philosophy of science. Among them are Wesley Salmon’s Theory of Causation, Lakatos’s “Science and pseudoscience,” etc. While discussing the philosophy of science two major names come before our vision. First is Kuhn and another is Popper. Thomas Kuhn was an American philosopher of science who forged a quite open, fundamental and democratic approach to science. He was a scholar and rebelled against the scientific establishment. Karl Popper on the other hand was the totalitarian and unadventurous proponent of positivism. Karl and Popper were the contemporaries and criticized each other’s work. The comparison on the philosophies of Kuhn and Popper following attributes are taken into consideration: 1. Differentiation between science and non science Popper opined that science is a method of trial and error. It is a method of assumption and refusal. Science is always accompanied by the group of scholars who check and criticize each other. The foundation of science is its rationality. The openness to criticism should be converted into the willingness of scientists to falsify their theory. Kuhn on the other hand differentiated science and non science through paradigms. Science takes place where there is a major paradigm and non science appears due to lack of dominant paradigm. Thus Kuhn talks about infantile science without a dominant paradigm and a normal science or matured science with a dominant paradigm. He took paradigm as a basic accomplishment which includes both theory and a very good application to the results of observations and experiments. It is very important to keep in mind that though Kuhn differentiated between science and non science through paradigms his differentiation was never based on objectivity. Karl Popper was against the confinement of science within faith and doctrine. Science follows the methods faithfully and these methods are objective. For Popper criticism is a necessary aspect for the scientific method of objectivity. The foundation of scientific rationality lies on the modernist project of reason, doubt, and criticism. To build this rationality science must be open to criticism and adapt critical attitude. Scientific knowledge according to him is snowballing. It is because of the positive approach of the scientists to go through falsification and they should be open to the criticism. According to Kuhn preconception and resistance seem to be the rule rather than the exception. He strongly believes that dogma is an essential part in mature science as the scientific paradigm is an open-ended achievement. It is necessary for the scientists to be assertive in their beliefs in paradigm. Then only they can further ensue to the puzzle solving task. 2. Criticism, Dogmatism and Faith Criticism is mandatory to science according to Popper whereas dogma is mandatory in mature science. Popper believes that faith in science is important one and one should stick on to the scientific methods. Kuhn believes that faith should be in scientific paradigm. Popper opines strongly that objectivity in science lies in scientific method. This opinion made Popper to use the concept of provisional knowledge. Scientific methods are enough to evaluate the merits of scientific theories because, as mentioned above objectivity lies in scientific method. This scientific method is paradigmatic for Kuhn. Objectivity is only feasible within the paradigm. Kuhn says that this scientific method is not able to evaluate the merits of scientific theories in an objective manner because scientific paradigms occur through extra-scientific factors. Scientific Revolution v/s Scientific progress Popper thinks that scientific progress happens through falsification. After going through falsification, the theory either stands true, or it is taken for granted as a provisional knowledge, and if the theory proves to be wrong, it is discarded and it can be modified. Scientific knowledge in general is cumulative according to Popper. Unlike Popper Kuhn denies the scientific progress but believes in scientific revolution. The common developmental pattern of mature science according to him is an alteration from one paradigm to another and it is through scientific revolution and not scientific progress. Kuhn used the more comprehensive term “Scientific Revolution,” to explain the power exists in scientific knowledge Scientific Objectivity: Karl Popper says that Objectivity exists in the method of science. Scientific method is not bounded by subjective factors. Scientific objectivity can be spoiled by subjective factors according to Karl Popper. But Kuhn has completely denied scientific subjectivity in the notion of incommensurability. According to Kuhn scientific theory is influence by some extra scientific factors. The incommensurable paradigms govern science. Rationality of Science: Karl Popper views that science is rational and is open to criticism. It is open minded, flexible and ready to accept falsification. Kuhn has an opposite opinion. According to him science is not rational but it is dogmatic and intransigent. After discussing and comparing the two different approaches of Popper and Kuhn, I personally feel that Popper’s approach is more acceptable. Though Kuhn’s opinions got popularity in the circle of intellectuals Kuhn’s concept of paradigms is not able to reflect the way that scientist works. Rather Popper’s concept is better than that of Kuhn. Popper is aware of the limitations of human beings. Human beings are bound to do the mistake. That is why he suggests the provisional knowledge. It is not possible to get the Knowledge or Truth due to these limitations. Human being constantly learns from trial and error methods. That is why he suggests the theory of trial and error. We do not have Knowledge, it does not mean that we should stop thinking of it, on the other hand his theory tells to do our best to reach to the closest to the theory. Unless and until some better option comes along, the provisional method is valid. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Philosophy of Science Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1437677-philosophy-of-science-take-home-exam
(Philosophy of Science Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1437677-philosophy-of-science-take-home-exam.
“Philosophy of Science Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1437677-philosophy-of-science-take-home-exam.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Circle of Intellectuals Kuhns Concept of Paradigms

Senior Philosophy Seminar: Plato, Sextus Empiricus, Descartes, Locke, Hume

This assignment "Senior Philosophy Seminar: Plato, Sextus Empiricus, Descartes, Locke, Hume" discusses how Kant disputes with Hume over the nature of our knowledge of cause and effect.... The assignment analyses a priori judgments that are usually analytic or synthetic.... hellip; Cause and effect are based on experience....
17 Pages (4250 words) Assignment

Contemplating God: Perception, Existence and the Prism of Experience

The Prussian state in which this concept was introduced was held by many to be an expression of the rational absolute, and Hegel's writings on the subject were seen as an apologia for an often repressive political system.... The writings of Feuerbach and his fellow “Young Hegelians” led to repressive measures by the Prussian state, particularly toward the university intellectuals....
16 Pages (4000 words) Term Paper

Philosophy paper - 1000 words - Mind, Meaning and Metaphysics - Material Provided

A: Influenced by the Babylonians and the Egyptians' love for astronomy, the ancient Greeks believed that everything in the world was created by gods and the natural phenomena were their manifestations.... There came a time however when the Greeks started to veer away from this… However, Greek science did not start in Greece but in the city of Miletus in Asia Minor on the Mediterranean coast of modern-day Turkey as well as in the other cities of that region....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Louis i kahns phenomenah

Looking around the great structures that encompass man's surrounding, one gets enthralled not only because of the grandeur and magnificence of the built structures but because behind the beauty and harmony that one sees and experience as one views a vision of beauty that has… This power which gushes forth from the creative prowess of the human mind affirms the very being of the creator of the buildings - from simple But more than that, the buildings that are created become the living testimony of the coming together of men, of the institution of men....
28 Pages (7000 words) Essay

Cultural Significance of Persona, Metropolis and Minority Report

The aim of this review is to discuss the contemporary culture and its ideology depicted in the movies "Persona", "Metropolis" and "Minority Report".... Additionally, the writer of the review will analyze the connection between the concepts of Enlightenment and Romanticism.... hellip; Ingmar Bergman's movie Persona, released in 1966, remains the ultimate instance of transferring the intricate elements of the human psyche to the language of cinema....
7 Pages (1750 words) Movie Review

Ability Groups: Do They Enhance or Hinder Children's Development and Attainment in Schools

The author states that ability groups enhance children's skills as instruction becomes more concentrated on their skill level and support from peers who are in the same situation they are in is available.... Ability groups may likewise hinder the development of children in terms of self-esteem … Not only should the teacher consider academic skills based on standard assessment procedures, but also her observations of each student's personal characteristics, background....
32 Pages (8000 words) Essay

The Use of History and Science to Attain Knowledge

It is not a surprise that historians, theorists, and intellectuals have from time to time turned their awareness to efforts to study history itself and the fundamentals of historical knowledge.... In the paper “The Use of History and Science to Attain Knowledge” the author focuses on the statement that every sort of knowledge is just subjective in which anyone, or any thought and idea, merely sees a different perspective for the same subject....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Reinterpreting the Ethics of Patient Consent and Disclosure of Information by the Clinician

The author of this paper "Reinterpreting the Ethics of Patient Consent and Disclosure of Information by the Clinician" discusses the importance of full patient informed consent by creating a paradigm whereby the ethics of the clinician are balanced with the need for quality patient care.... hellip; This extends to not only threats made by the patient himself or herself, but it extends to the therapist having the obligation to notify any individual or group of individuals of the possible threat that has been made against them....
32 Pages (8000 words) Research Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us