StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Islam and Democracy: A Contextual Discussion - Term Paper Example

Cite this document
Summary
This paper focuses on the analysis of Islam and Democracy through an analysis of two texts Lewis Bernard’s Islam and Liberal Democracy: A Historical Overview and Irfan Ahmad’s Democracy and Islam. The paper aims at providing a better understanding of the distinct interaction them. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.6% of users find it useful
Islam and Democracy: A Contextual Discussion
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Islam and Democracy: A Contextual Discussion"

Islam and Democracy: A Contextual Discussion (Article Analysis) A talk of Islam and Democracy in a given context is a clear means towards greater understanding, or an increase in disagreements. Either way, the subject matter, found within is of emotive substance, drawing varied responses, reactions, perspectives and ideals. Different contexts, times/eras, civilizations, regional factors and outside influences have all contributed to the debate, regarding Islam and Democracy. Islam is of divine nature, as a Law provided to Man, as a guide in social behavior, order and interaction. Democracy, on the other hand, is a creation of Man, influential in enabling some form of social order, peace and positive socialization. On this core issue, both the Islamic religious teachings; and their counterparts in legal law are in agreement (Diamond, Larry, Marc and Daniel 12). To better understand the contextual nature of this debate, is the need to delve more into the two subject matters, as distinct ideals, with a form/ type of connection. This paper’s aim is to focus on a critical analysis of – Islam and Democracy – through an analysis of two texts – Lewis Bernard’s Islam and Liberal Democracy: A Historical Overview (1996) and Irfan Ahmad’s Democracy and Islam (2011). There will be a comparison and contrast of the two, with regard to the subject matter; thereby showcasing distinct features present. As a whole, the paper will aim at providing a better understanding of the distinct interaction between Islamic religion and the notion/ideal of Democracy. A HISTORICAL ANALYSIS OF THE TWO: ISLAM AND DEMOCRACY The Islamic religion is a globally accepted way of life, represents different meanings. First, it is a global religion, influential to over 1 billion lives; as a system of belief, doctrine, worship and ideals. Pertinently, as Lewis (1996) alludes, it is part of the family of scriptural, monotheistic religions, with the other two being Christianity and Judaism (53). On the other hand, it also is representative of the whole civilization that grew and continues to grow under the guidance of Islam. Inclusive in this latter categorization, is the presence of art, culture, tradition, academics and general social interaction; which uniquely sets it apart from what may be conceived as ‘Christendom’. Democracy, as Diamond, Marc and Daniel (2003) provide, in reference to the liberal connotation, pertains to the core means/ avenue through which governments were chosen or removed; by way of viable electoral processes. This entailed the presence of representation, by way of parliamentary; and later on federal systems of governance (Diamond, Marc and Daniel 18). Uniquely so, is the presence of peaceful changes of governing administrations through elections; a transition best exemplified by Huntington’s dictum. There is also the upholding of various universal laws i.e. the Bill of Human Rights and Freedoms, which essentially, enable such transitions to occur in a peaceful, democratic manner (Lewis 23). Accordingly, he alludes to a democracy as an avenue of social governance in which two consecutive and peaceful government changes occur (52). In regard to democracy, it should be noted that there is a differing perspective; with regard to democracy, as envisioned by Americans and Europeans. This is influential with regard to the presence of democracy in European Monarchies, as opposed to republics. Lewis provides that Americans in general, tend to view monarchy and democracy in antithetical terms. This is as provided for in the American form of democracy, which is purely distinct from other existing democracies. In Europe, it should be noted however that their forms of democracy have fared better within constitutionally respected and acknowledged monarchies, than in their republican counterparts (Diamond, Marc and Daniel 26). Islam and the link to Democracy and Democratic Ideals. As seen earlier, there is a co-relational feature between Islam as a way of life, and Democratic ideals in the contemporary arena. In the Islamic world, the principle of dynasty is still quite strong, as is best showcased by the Religion’s origin (53). Saudi Arabia, home to the two core regions of the Islamic religion – Mecca and Medina, derives its identity and name from its ruling and founding dynasty, the Saud Family. Islam as a Religion and Way of Life and Governance In this context, as Lewis (1996) provides, it embodies both the religious aspect and the socialization culture pertinent to the populations which identify themselves as Muslims. There is the presence of pure, pristine and original Islam, as provided by both the Quran and Hadith (Prophet Muhammad’s traditions); in addition to what may be termed as classical Islamic Theology and Jurisprudence (53). Additionally, in contexts of contemporary society, has been the founding of Neo-Islam, projected by fundamentalists, who have been influential in the introduction of new ideals, unknown in Hadith, the Quran or the existing classical doctrines of Islamic faith. Autocracy has been the backbone of a majority of Islam dominated state entities, which number in total to about 53 nations. Noteworthy is the fact that in Islam there lacks a place for the word ‘citizen’, as is provided for in democracies. In place however, is the presence of a rich, historically diverse political literature (Lewis 53). This is in relation to how the ruler and the ruled regard political power; which is to be acquired and used for the betterment of society as a whole. This is the distinguishing factor, between an autocratic leadership and despotism. Ahmad (2011) alludes to the prevailing aspects of democratic leadership, as found within the Islamic world, where the ruler’s exercise political power is equated to a contract; of mutual commitment between the ruled and the ruler. Through presentation, he is able to showcase the practical aspect of democratic governance within the Islamic world, and specifically so, India’s Islamist organization – the Jamaat-e-Islami. According to him, Islam does regard all types of Governments, which are non-parliamentary or non-constitutional as being the greatest human sin possible (459). Islam and Democratic Governance Democracy, as practiced by the Western world, is different from that found in the Islamic world. This is true of the very foundations of both principles, fundamentally influenced by the aspect of culture. This provides the reason for its ‘incompatibility’ with democracy and democratic governance (Diamond, Marc and Daniel 32). Culturally, from the beginning, the Islamic world has not known a distinctive separation between the state and Islam. In this context, the three facets of Islam i.e. as a religion, civilization and means of governance, all prove to be individually antagonistic to the core ideals behind democracy (Ahmad 460). To this end, both the state and Islam, as a religion have stood side by side, with regard to governance, social order, peaceful interaction and cultural socialization. This is an exception to the secularization process found within most democracies, as a result of the fusion between the state/ religion and state. Distinctly, this should not be associated with the presence of Islamic fundamentalism, especially that of an extremist nature. Enriching this debate is the presence of two opposing poles (461). On the one hand are thinkers such as Maududi and Syed Qutub, who amongst others selectively utilized different Islamic traditions and texts to propagate their message. Theirs was the view that democracy cannot co-exist with Islamic jurisdictions. On the other hand, were thinkers such as Bayat, Filali-Ansary, Voll and Esposito, who envisaged the possibility of democracy existing within Islam. Their ideals were founded on the notion that just as the Church (Roman Catholic) endeavored in promoting democracy within the larger European region, so too can Islam, within Muslim states. Through normative-textual interpretation, there is provision of an avenue through which democratic governance may be possible within Islamic states. This is anchored on the most cited Quranic verse (XLII: 38) – ‘amruhum shura bainahum [decide your affairs through consultation]’ (461). The Islamic organization - the Jamaat-e-Islami – initially was opposed to the notion of democracy in Islam, but later on accepted and incorporated it. To be noted is the notion that Muslim polities may have inadvertently de-democratized by the West. Their opposition was influenced by the notion that democracy did serve as a defense for bloodshed. This is the reason why accordingly, dictators would rule, while evoking democracy. The group initially, was driven by the notion that Islam opposed democracy. This was due to the fact that the latter authorized the election of representatives, who legislated human laws, as opposed to divine laws (462). This distinction does permeate through the debate, focused on the issue of which laws to adhere to and the basis for such laws. In democracies, people are in possession of the right to formulate laws on issues of politics, morality, economics and social order. Conversely, in Islam, divine law is responsible for the founding of laws on morality, social order and the pertinent socio-economic aspects. Through the organization, Ahmad is able to showcase the co-existence or relationship present, between Islam and democratic institutions of governance (464). Accordingly, the group aimed at pursuing democratic practices and governance, with the aim of establishing the Islamic religion, which Lewis views differently. According to his text, he alludes to the presence of Islam as being the basis and hence, the foundation of democratic governance (Lewis 55). An agreement between the two authors, is on the fact that outside influences were crucial to the way in which Islam viewed and subsequently practiced democracy, abate in limited contextual nature. In addition is the fact that both Islam and Democracy share the aspect of power-sharing that is non-violent, between the ruled and the rulers (both entities being considered equal). Here, there is the comparison of the Mosque, in Islam, and the representative chambers, within democracies, as avenues of political participation that is basic to the lives of different populations. Not only is the Mosque an arena of worship, but also a venue where dialogue, business and discussions actively take place (Ahmad 466). Pertinent to this is Bellah’s ideals that American political theory attributes sovereignty as resting with the people, in addition to being both explicitly and implicitly attributed to God. Concerning this, Islamic law and jurisprudence, while resting on the existing Ulama, and the Umma in general, is fundamentally founded on the provisions and guidance of Allah. In conclusion, from both texts, there are both comparisons, as well as contrasts, with regard to the democratic principles’ application, within the Islamic religion and Muslim state. On the one hand, Lewis alludes to democracy existing only in case scenarios where two consecutive peaceful elections are conducted. Thus, democracy and Islam cannot be compatible, abate the presence of minimal linkages. Ahmad on his part alludes to the presence of Islamic forms of democracy, where the ruled population, is divinely protected from arbitrary law. This is influenced by the fact that all Islamic law (Sharia) and Jurisprudence, are divinely provided by Allah, with the aim of enhancing human lives, rights and property. Works Cited Ahmad, Irfan. “Democracy and Islam.” Philosophy and Social Criticism, 37.4 2011: 459–470. Electronic. Diamond, Larry, Marc F. Plattner and Daniel Brumberg. (2003). Islam and Democracy in the Middle East. JHU Press, 2003. Print. Lewis, Bernard. "Islam and Liberal Democracy: A Historical Overview." Journal of Democracy 7.2 1996: 52-63. Electronic. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Islam and Democracy: A Contextual Discussion Term Paper”, n.d.)
Islam and Democracy: A Contextual Discussion Term Paper. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/politics/1633797-compare-and-contrast-essay
(Islam and Democracy: A Contextual Discussion Term Paper)
Islam and Democracy: A Contextual Discussion Term Paper. https://studentshare.org/politics/1633797-compare-and-contrast-essay.
“Islam and Democracy: A Contextual Discussion Term Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/politics/1633797-compare-and-contrast-essay.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Islam and Democracy: A Contextual Discussion

Moral Problem

hellip; One likely objection to the foregoing discussion is that it advocates an escalation of force that may exacerbate the violent condition it seeks to resolve.... The paper " Moral Problem" shall examine the decision Gaddafi has so far pursued but may still revise, regarding his response to his people's clamour for democracy, will examine the moral dilemma, and arrive at a moral solution pursuant to the decision procedures of Utilitarianism and Kantianism....
10 Pages (2500 words) Research Paper

2 Major Political Issues Confronting the U.S

Such talks are always focused on islam, because the biggest terrorist attacks in the U.... were done by people who claim their actions were inspired by the teaching of islam.... There are two critical issues that threaten both the political system and economic recovery of the United States....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

The difference between nonviolent resistance and pacifism

This distinction allows for a proper discussion, for instance of pacifism in different ideological, political and even religious contexts, with religious here in reference to all kinds of religion, not just islam and not just Christianity.... discussion To take the question into perspective, there are non-Muslim perspectives that make distinctions between nonviolent resistance and what is termed in the literature as modern pacifism.... It also explores why nonviolent resistance is justified in the ethics of islam, but not pacifism....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Is Oil a Blessing or a Curse for the Middle East

Moreover, even though a similar economic stance has been taken with regards to a centrally planned economy in both nations, the overall levels of extreme wealth and pervasive poverty, social divisions, non-democratic forms of governance, problems with radical forms of islam, and a host of other byproducts of the uneven economic development that oil wealth dependence portends crates a great deal of similarity between these two nations.... Aside from the collapse of the Ottoman Empire and redefining the post-colonial borders, the discovery of oil and natural gas resources has had the most profound impact upon the course of development, politics, war, and even radical forms of islam....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

What is the Muslim Brotherhood and why is it so popular in Egypt

discussion The Muslim Brotherhood From a generalised perspective, Muslim Brotherhood is regarded as a social and religious organisation that has its presence in various Islamic and non-Islamic nations of the world.... The group or the society of islam brothers is often translated as the Muslim Brotherhood.... The group or the society of islam brothers is often translated as the Muslim Brotherhood.... It seeks to operate and show its influence in various aspects of the day to day life of people belonging to the islam community, integrating all the Muslim like-minded people from around the world to regain the historical identity and a respectful position of Muslim society in the modern world (Aldridge, 2013, pp....
11 Pages (2750 words) Essay

The Impact of Social Media on Politics in the Arab World

Hypothesis – The reality is that the use of social media by protestors during the Arab Spring could not possibly have accomplished democracy, even if it was successful in the overthrow of many strongmen.... The paper "The Impact of Social Media on Politics in the Arab World" tells that extensive use of social media sites during the Arab Spring was quite beneficial because it did away with the monopoly that the former repressive governments had over popular opinion as well as over different information....
9 Pages (2250 words) Research Paper

The End of the Cold War

hellip; Concisely, from the above discussion, it is evident that the collapse of the USSR marked the end of the cold war.... The author of the paper titled "The End of the Cold War" focuses on quite a number of aspects that led to the end of the cold war.... The main aspect for its end is the Soviet Union, but there are explaining factors that led to the downfall, of the USSR....
11 Pages (2750 words) Coursework

Center for the Study of Islam and Democracy

The focus of this paper "Center for the Study of islam and democracy" is on a non-profit organization that was founded in March 1999 by an MIT-trained robotics engineer along with a  group comprising of both Muslim and non-Muslim activists, academicians, and professionals from the USA.... The Center for the Study of islam and democracy has now been playing a significant role in promoting a better understanding of Islam.... CSID's activities include producing several publications throughout the year, such as the Muslim Democrat, Conference Proceedings, and Democracy Watch, sponsoring regular lectures by prominent people, holding conferences and panel discussions, and various other activities on islam and democracy....
1 Pages (250 words) Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us