The paper "Sociologist Critique on Heterosexual Couple and Their Children" is a wonderful example of a report on family and consumer science. The family is defined as the relationship of a heterosexual couple with their children. However, in today's modern society especially across the United Kingdom, this definition is seemingly changing because of being surrounded by controversial and ambiguous criticism from social scientists. It is quite important to understand that this definition of a family is known widely to every human society which is coupled by carrying out vital roles and functions within a family.
The other issue connected to a family is that of being a household in relation to the industrialized society. Traditionally, before work moved from home to factories, parents and their children lived under one roof and are for this same reason why many social activists are questioning whether this was the start of the nuclear family break up or change its initial definition (Sobotka 2008). In the United Kingdom, the debate and criticism of the definition of a nuclear family started in the twentieth century due to the constant increase in technology and globalization.
Pioneer social activists gave the study that it is essential to the definition of family to be associated universally so as to fill its needs and functions. Today, many couples in the UK are finding themselves surviving without children which were not the case traditionally (Sobotka 2008). It is quite evident that the definition that a family is an association between a heterosexual couple and their children is lacking meaning. Whether it is defined from a sole prevailing perspective or as a basic unit perception, it still remains that this functional group should be of strong ties between parents and their children. In the United Kingdom, the debate connected to the above-defined description is centered on one which is designed to fit the needs of industrial society.
Research across this country greatly places emphasis on family diversity not only on designed cultures but within its historical period. In addition to this, sociologists across the UK continue to point out that different languages seem to stick to different definitions of the family especially to suit or blend in their own culture (Bauman 2001).
Sobotka, T. (2008). ‘Changing family and partnership behavior: common trends and persistent diversity across Europe: Demographic Research, 19:6, pp. 85-138
Struening, K. (1999). Familial purpose: an argumentative against the promotion of family uniformity. Policy studies journal, vol 27.
Bauman, Z. (2001). The individualized society. Cambridge: polity press.