Essays on Integrative Approach to Managing People Issues Arising from Implementing a New Performance Literature review

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper “ Integrative Approach to Managing People Issues Arising from Implementing a New Performance” is a great variant of the literature review on human resources. Performance management and performance improvements have become popular topics in 21st-century businesses. The increased focus on performance management has particularly been triggered by the increasing pressure on organizations to the extent that businesses are now expected to become more effective and efficient to remain competitive. According to Pettijohn et al. (2001), top-performing companies have high performing employees and are using their employees are valuable resources to achieve a competitive advantage.

Performance appraisal is one of the tools that most organizations across industries use as a yardstick for measuring the performance of their employees (Mikkelsen et al. , 1997). Although most employees conduct performance appraisals on regular basis, such as half-yearly or yearly, evidence indicates that implementing a performance appraisal is a challenge to most organizations. The challenge emanates from the fact that most employees fear hearing the world “ performance appraisal’ and would always try to resist any attempt to implement a performance appraisal (Gerrish, 2016).

Besides resistance, there are many other organizational behaviors or people issues that are associated with implementing a performance appraisal system. This paper discusses people's issues associated with performance appraisal and suggests how best to manage the issues. The major areas of focus include perception and attribution, motivation and learning, leadership, and change management. Purposes and Benefits of Performance AppraisalPerformance appraisal is an important performance management tool used across industries. Performance appraisal is also regarded as one of the most important functions of human resource management. Mikkelsen et al. (1997) define performance appraisal as the formal review systems that an organization used to evaluate the performance of an employee and teams over a specific time period.

A good performance appraisal is based on measurable and quantifiable information, such as productivity as this ensures fairness in the entire organization. Performance appraisals serve many purposes in an organization.

References

Adams, M. A. (2000). Reinforcement theory and behavior analysis. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 9(1), 3-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0100529

Aguinis, H. (2009). Performance management. London: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Boswell, W. R., & Boudreau, J. W. (2000). Employee satisfaction with performance appraisals and appraisers: The role of perceived appraisal use. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 11(3), 283–283.

Burns, B. (2009). Managing change (5th ed.). Essex, England: Prentice-Hall.

DuBrin, A.J. 2007. Leadership: Research findings, practice, and skills (5th. ed.). Boston:

Houghton Mifflin.

Gerrish, E. D. (2016). The impact of performance management on performance in public organizations: A Meta-Analysis. Public Administration Review, 76(1), 48-66.

Jabeen, M. (2011). Impact of performance appraisal on employees motivation. European Journal of Business and Management, 3(4), 197-204.

Jick, T. D., & Peiperl, M. (2010). Managing change: Cases and concepts (3rd. ed.). Chicago:

McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Jones, E. F., & Nisbett, R. E. (1972). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. In H. H. Kelley, Nisbett, R. E., Valins, S., & Weiner, B. (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.

Kotter J. P. (1996).Leading change First edition. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Latham, G.P. (2012). Work motivation history, theory, research, and practice. Thousand

Oaks, C.A.: Sage.

Levy, P. E., & Williams, J. R. (2004). The social context of performance appraisal: A review and framework for the future. Journal or Management, 30(6).

Martinko, M. 1995. Attribution theory: an Organizational perspective. Delray Beach

Florida: St Lucie Press.

Mikkelsen, A., Ogaard, T., & Lovrich, N. P. (1997). Impact of an integrative performance appraisal experience on perceptions of management quality and working environment. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 17(3), 82-98.

Pettijohn, C. E., Pettijohn, L. S., & d’Amico, M. (2001). Characteristic of performance appraisals and their impacts on sales force satisfaction. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12(2), 127-146.

Redmon, M. K., & Dickinson, A. M. (1990). Promoting excellence through performance management. New York: Psychology Press.

Senior, B. & Swailes, S. 2010. Organizational change (4th ed.). Essex, England: PrenticeHall.

Spector, B. 2010. Implementing organizational change theory into practice (2nd ed.)

Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Steers, R., Porter, L. & Bigley, G. 1996. Motivation and leadership at work (6th ed.). New

York: McGraw-Hill.

Swift, S. A., Moore, D. A., Sharek, Z. S., & Gino, F. (2013). Inflated applicants: Attribution errors in performance evaluation by professionals. PLoS ONE 8(7): e69258. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0069258

Yukl, G.A. (2010). Leadership in organizations (7th. ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice

Hall.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us