The paper "Corporate Governance Practices - Petro Apple, and Mitsubishi Corporation " is a perfect example of a business case study. Corporate governance refers to the set of guidelines, processes, and practices, which are essential in directing, guiding, and controlling an organisation, business entity, or company. Corporate governance involves the ability and potentiality of an organization to stability the expectations of the numerous investors inclusive of the shareholders, management, suppliers, financiers, customers, governments, and communities in pursuit of competitive advantage. Corporate governance has the potential of offering a substantial framework for attaining the objectives of an organisation.
It also encompasses every domain of administration from action plans and interior reins to the evaluation of performance, as well as business confession. Numerous business entities or companies struggle to have quality corporate governance because of the insufficiency of profitability within the market and industry of operation. The organisations need to adopt and implement good corporate governance through ecological consciousness, moral behaviour, and appropriate or ideal corporate governance practices. These are essential in enhancing the image and reputation of the business entity under the influence of globalisation.
In the course of achieving effective and efficient corporate governance practices, business entities or organisations should focus on the attainment of five critical elements. These aspects include alignment of the business goals, integration of strategic management, quality organisation, effective reporting systems, and efficient ethical practices in accordance with the demands and expectations of the business entities, as well as target audiences. In the course of executing this research, the focus will be on comparing and contrasting the corporate governance practices of three firms with reference to Petro (China), Apple (United States), and Mitsubishi Corporation (Japan).
List of References
1. Cornelissen, J. 2014. Corporate communication: A guide to theory and practice. Sage.
2. Solomon, J. 2007. Corporate governance and accountability. John Wiley & Sons.
3. Brigham, E., & Ehrhardt, M. 2013. Financial management: theory & practice. Cengage Learning.
4. Epstein, M. J., & Buhovac, A. R. 2014. Making sustainability work: Best practices in managing and measuring corporate social, environmental, and economic impacts. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
5. Thompson, A., Peteraf, M., Gamble, J., Strickland III, A. J., & Jain, A. K. 2013. Crafting & Executing Strategy 19/e: The Quest for Competitive Advantage: Concepts and Cases. McGraw-Hill Education.
6. McCahery, J. A., Vermeulen, E. P., & Hisatake, M. 2013. The Present and Future of Corporate Governance: Re-Examining the Role of the Board of Directors and Investor Relations in Listed Companies. European Company and Financial Law Review, 10(2), 117-163.
7. Benshalom, I. 2014. Who Should Decide Whether the Apple Is Rotten? Tax Disclosure and Corporate Political Agency. Columbia Journal of Tax Law, Forthcoming.
8. Ferrell, O. C., & Fraedrich, J. 2014. Business ethics: Ethical decision making & cases. Cengage learning.
9. Tricker, R. I. 2015. Corporate Governance: Principles, Policies, and Practices. Oxford University Press.
10. Gilson, R. J., & Gordon, J. N. 2013. The Agency Costs of Agency Capitalism: Activist Investors and the Revaluation of Governance Rights. Columbia Law Review, 863-927.
11. Carroll, A., & Buchholtz, A. 2014. Business and society: Ethics, sustainability, and stakeholder management. Cengage Learning.
12. Backer, L. C. 2012. Transparency and Business in International Law—Governance between Norm and Technique. Available at SSRN 2025503.
13. Backer, L. C. 2013. Transnational Corporations' Outward Expression of Inward Self-Constitution: The Enforcement of Human Rights by Apple, Inc. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 20(2), 805-879.
14. Benn, S., Dunphy, D., & Griffiths, A. 2014. Organizational change for corporate sustainability. Routledge.
15. Berk, J., DeMarzo, P., Harford, J., Ford, G., Mollica, V., & Finch, N. 2013. Fundamentals of corporate finance. Pearson Higher Education AU.
16. Anderson, B. P. 2014. Corporate Sustainability: A Long-Term Perspective on Maximizing Shareholder Value. JL Bus. & Ethics, 20, 155.
17. Chan, L. Y. 2014. Corporate Social Responsibility of Multinational Corporations.
18. Butler, S. R. 2012. All on Board: Strategies for Constructing Diverse Boards of Directors. Va. L. & Bus. Rev., 7, 61.
19. Dicks, D. L. 2012. Executive compensation and the role for corporate governance regulation. Review of Financial Studies, hhs055.
20. Chen, V. Z., Li, J., & Shapiro, D. M. 2011. Are OECD-prescribed “good corporate governance practices” really good in an emerging economy?. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28(1), 115-138.
21. Claessens, S., & Yurtoglu, B. B. 2013. Corporate governance in emerging markets: A survey. Emerging markets review, 15, 1-33.
22. Globerman, S., Peng, M. W., & Shapiro, D. M. 2011. Corporate governance and Asian companies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28(1), 1-14.
23. Thomas, R. J., Schrage, M., Bellin, J. B., Marcotte, G., Strategy, B., & Governance, C. 2013. How boards can be better—a manifesto. Image.
24. Goergen, M. 2012. International corporate governance. Pearson Higher Ed.
25. Samaha, K., Dahawy, K., Hussainey, K., & Stapleton, P. 2012. The extent of corporate governance disclosure and its determinants in a developing market: The case of Egypt. Advances in Accounting, 28(1), 168-178.
26. Kathy Rao, K., Tilt, C. A., & Lester, L. H. 2012. Corporate governance and environmental reporting: an Australian study. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, 12(2), 143-163.
27. Siebels, J. F., & zu Knyphausen‐Aufseß, D. 2012. A review of theory in family business research: The implications for corporate governance. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(3), 280-304.
28. Nakamura, M. 2011. Adoption and policy implications of Japan’s new corporate governance practices after the reform. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28(1), 187-213.
29. Cornelissen, J. 2014. Corporate communication: A guide to theory and practice. Sage.
30. Michelon, G., & Parbonetti, A. 2012. The effect of corporate governance on sustainability disclosure. Journal of Management & Governance, 16(3), 477-509.
31. Adams, CA 2004 The ethical, social and environmental reporting performance portrayal gap. Accounting Auditing and Accountability Journal 17: pp. 731-757
32. Adams, CA, Larrinaga-González, C 2007 Engaging with organisations in pursuit of improved sustainability accounting and performance. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 20: pp. 333-355
33. Adams, CA, McNicholas, P 2007 Making a difference: Sustainability reporting, accountability and organisational change. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 20: pp. 382-402.
34. Aerts, W, Cormier, D, Magnan, M 2006 Intra-industry imitation in corporate environmental reporting: An international perspective. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 25: pp. 299-331
35. Brennan, NM, Solomon, J 2008, Corporate governance, accountability and mechanisms of accountability: An overview. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 21: pp. 885-906
36. Cerbioni, F, Parbonetti, A 2007, Exploring the effects of corporate governance on intellectual capital disclosure: An analysis of European biotechnology companies. European Accounting Review 16: pp. 791-826
37. Deakin, S, Whittaker, H 2007, Re-embedding the corporation? Comparative perspectives on corporate governance, employment relations and corporate social responsibility. Corporate Governance: An International Review 15: pp. 1-4
38. Driver, C, Thompson, G 2002, Corporate governance and democracy: The stakeholder debate revisited. Journal of Management and Governance 6: pp. 111-130
39. Haniffa, RM, Cooke, TE 2005, The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 24: pp. 391-430
40. Huse, M 2003, Renewing management and governance: New paradigms of governance?. Journal of Management and Governance 7: pp. 211-221
41. Peasnell, K, Pope, PF, Young, S 2005, Board monitoring and earnings management: Do outside directors influence abnormal accruals?. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 32: pp. 1311-1346
42. Unerman, J, Bennett, M 2004, Increased stakeholder dialogue and the internet: Towards greater corporate accountability or reinforcing capitalist hegemony?. Accounting, Organizations and Society 29: pp. 685-707
43. Aguilera, R, Williams, C, Conley, J, Rupp, D 2006, Corporate governance and social responsibility: A comparative analysis of the UK and the US. Corporate Governance an International Review 14: pp. 147-158
44. Bhatia, A. 2013. International genre, local flavour: Analysis of PetroChina’s Corporate and Social Responsibility Report.
45. Li, S., Brockman, P., & Zurbruegg, R. 2014. Cross-listing, firm-specific information, and corporate governance: Evidence from Chinese A-shares and H-shares. Journal of Corporate Finance.
46. Larcker, D., & Tayan, B. 2011. Corporate governance matters: A closer look at organizational choices and their consequences. FT Press.
47. Aguilera, R. V., Desender, K. A., & Kabbach de Castro, L. 2012. A configurational approach to comparative corporate governance. T. Clarke, & D. Branson, SAGE Handbook of corporate governance. New York: SAGE publications.
48. Ding, C. 2013. Corporate governance, enforcement and financial development: the Chinese experience. Edward Elgar Publishing.
49. Tomasic, R. 2013. Corporate Governance in Chinese Companies Going Global. A revised version is available in The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law (2014) Vol, 2(1), 155-174.
50. Aguilera, R. V., Desender, K. A., & Kabbach de Castro, L. R. 2012. A bundle perspective to comparative corporate. The SAGE Handbook of Corporate Governance, London: SAGE Publications Ltd, 379-405.
51. Lin, L. W. 2013. State Ownership and Corporate Governance in China: An Executive Career Approach. Colum. Bus. L. Rev., 743.
52. Schiehll, E., Ahmadjian, C., & Filatotchev, I. 2014. National governance bundles perspective: Understanding the diversity of corporate governance practices at the firm and country levels. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 22(3), 179-184.
53. Epstein, M. J., & Buhovac, A. R. 2014. Making sustainability work: Best practices in managing and measuring corporate social, environmental, and economic impacts. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
54. Ahmadjian, C. L. 2012. Corporate Governance Convergence in Japan. The Convergence of Corporate Governance: Promise and Prospects, 117.
55. Jackson Jr, R. J., & Milhaupt, C. J. 2014. Corporate Governance and Executive Compensation: Evidence from Japan. Colum. Bus. L. Rev., 111.
56. Aronson, B. E. 2015. Japanese Corporate Governance Reform: A Comparative Perspective. Hastings Bus. LJ, 11, 85-193.
57. Yonekura, A., Gallhofer, S., & Haslam, J. 2012. Accounting disclosure, corporate governance and the battle for markets: The case of trade negotiations between Japan and the US. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 23(4), 312-331.
58. Christofi, A., Christofi, P., & Sisaye, S. 2012. Corporate sustainability: historical development and reporting practices. Management Research Review, 35(2), 157-172.
59. Nakamura, M., & Fruin, W. M. 2012. Implications of the Japan model for corporate governance and management for China and other emerging economies in Asia. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 6(2), 122-142.
60. Noronha, C. 2014. Corporate Social Disclosure in China and Japan: An Introduction. Corporate Social Disclosure: Critical Perspectives in China and Japan, 1.