• essayintl.com >
  • Case Study >
  • Apply The Prescribed Ethical Decimation Making Model (P.30 ) Using The Article Port Hueneme Police chief resigns

Essays on Apply The Prescribed Ethical Decimation Making Model (P.30 ) Using The Article Port Hueneme Police chief resigns Case Study

Download free paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

Ethical Decision Making Ethical Decision Making Ethical Decision Making Model The Ethical Decision Making Model prescribes responsibility as the paramount means to municipal ethics which also include administration. Responsibility is fundamental to democratic accountability to dealing and recognizing with conflicting obligations in regard to being a public servant. Responsibility defines new obligations and roles that a public servant must adhere to which enhances a sense of public responsibility (Cooper, 2012). According to Cooper (2012), public officials should have outmost ethical ethics since they do have multiple obligations and roles which go hand in hand with them and therefore they have discretion.

What guides them as public servants are these ethics which ensure that they have responsible and effective use of this discretion. A public administrator is best described as a fiduciary professional citizen. Administrators are first and foremost citizens although they do have distinct responsibilities which come from two crucial sources. These sources include the reasoning that the administrators are professionals, who are public servants with fiduciary obligations and are people who take and spend the public’s money. They thus have heavy obligations towards the public at large.

Therefore, Sheehan should have known better that she owed an obligation to the people of Port Hueneme since her actions are contrary to what was expected from her (Martinez, 2012). The article on Police Chief Kathleen Sheehan shows that it is paramount that public officials develop skills in thinking of their possible ethical problems. This is normally towards the end of creating a favorable working professional ethic of their own. Lack of enhancing this ability to generalize and theorize from experience, none of the public administrators can excel the boundaries of certain events to comprehend and assess them.

This could also lead to lack of direction towards where the public servant is headed. The public servants choices are usually constrained whereas freedom is eventually stunted due to the unforeseen consequences of the public servants actions (Martinez, 2012). Evidently, thinking ethically does not necessarily make public administrators be better people nor does it make their decisions to be compassionate and fair. This is also applicable to the processes that they use in making their decisions. From the article about Police Chief Kathleen Sheehan, this is notable.

Ideally, thinking ethically ensures that administrators have more freedom while allowing them to adequately anticipate more in order to see what is ahead of them. This enables them to have proper and effective strategies which ultimately enhance them to be better administrators (Martinez, 2012). In conclusion, all public officials have to always think ethically. Each public official should develop a suitable work ethic known as character. This is made possible through active decision making regarding ethical issues one after another in order to fully develop the require character.

The public administrator is fully responsible for any decisions made including decisions of not taking any action. All these decisions are about personal responsibility. Every person is required to act and think ethically but ideally public officials have an extra obligation known as accountability. They need to act and explain all their actions. They do have a legal duty to provide and offer the best service to the citizens. Ethical principles call for public administrators to recognize the paramount need and the requirement to be accountable regarding their conduct to the public as well as to the people, press, courts and their superiors (Cooper, 2012).

For public administrators to explain their conduct, they should consciously tackle and process systematically the ethical dimensions of decision making. They should justify and explain their conduct and also be prepared to explain the same if requested. Public officials have an obligation to act and think ethically whereas understanding their actions in order to honestly explain to other people. References Cooper, T. L. (2012). The responsible administrator: An approach to ethics for the administrative role.

San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Martinez Arlene. (2012, Dec. 11). Port Huemene Police Chief resigns amid alleged improprieties. Retrieved from http: //www. vcstar. com/news/2012/dec/11/port-hueneme-police-chief-resigns/

Download free paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us