Essays on Using Animals for Testing Coursework

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper "Using Animals for Testing" is a great example of business coursework.   Throughout the years, animals have been used in various fields. Nonetheless, the issue of using them in medical research has notably attracted public attention since, to most people, it seems unnatural and cruel despite the number of animals used for various purposes and ill-effects. Research indicates that more than 50 million animals are used globally in experiments annually. For the past decades, there have been increasing debates on animal experimentation, which can be categorized into two distinct features: firstly, do animal research yield important knowledge that is not available from other sources and secondly, is it accepted morally to use the animals in a way which harms them.

Such questions have created a divide among the people (Linzey and Tutu 114). In medical research, animals have improved dramatically the health of the human race. It is important to note that without animal testing, the cure for diseases such as polio would not be existing while most diabetics would be dead from the diseases. Nonetheless, some people rubbish such benefits citing that it is wrong to use animals for testing medicine.

It is from that background that this essay will argue for and against using animals for testing in medical research. a conclusion will be drawn based on the findings of the research. Arguments for animal testing Animal testing allows scientist to test and develop new drugs that assist to save human lives. There are animals such as monkeys and rabbits that have almost similar genetic compositions and physical processes to human beings. With such features, it becomes easier for the scientists to test the effects of certain drugs on the animals.

If the drug under the test produces undesirable results on the animals, then it is evident that it would have negative impacts on humans. Therefore, using animals for testing in medical research assists in the development of different treatment methods and finding safer methods of treatments. From such analysis, animal testing is the only accurate method of learning the human body without causing harm to them (Cruelty-Free International, 2016). Even though most people tend to argue that medical researchers put the lives of animals are risk through using them as a test specimen, the main question that has remained unanswered is whether animals life needs to value more than that of the humans.

Based on emotional thinking, there might be some guilt that animals are being hurt; however, while thinking about the numbers of human lives that have been saved from animal testing, it makes the process worth. The animals may not have similar psychology as humans; nonetheless, animal testing is accurate enough in testing whether the developed substance is safe enough for human consumption.

Considering the fact that animal testing has been able to aid in the development of treatment for bacterial infections, which are the main causes of death globally, has been able to save many lives. Besides, most people believed that animal testing only assists humans, though it is important to note that animal testing also assists animals in various ways (PETA, 2014). Humans and animals share certain diseases such as high blood pressures, cancer, asthma, and epilepsy; therefore, they need similar medications as humans for treatment, which come from animal testing.

Halting animal research is likely to have an unfavourable consequence on the health and welfare of the humans considering that there is no alternative viable experimentation.

Works Cited

Chicago, I. L. "Petition • Stop Animal Testing: Replace Animals in Research with Non-Animal Alternative Methods • Change.org." Change.org, Change.org, 2015, www.change.org/p/stop-animal-testing-replace-animals-in-research-with-non-animal-alternative-methods. Accessed 5 May 2017.

Coster, Patience. Animal Research and Testing. Wayland, 2011.

Cruelty Free International. "Arguments Against Animal Testing." Cruelty Free International, Cruelty Free International, 2016, www.crueltyfreeinternational.org/why-we-do-it/arguments-against-animal-testing. Accessed 5 May 2017.

Linzey, Andrew, and Desmond Tutu. The Global Guide to Animal Protection. University of Illinois Press, 2013.

Lone Star College System. "Save the Animals: Stop Animal Testing." Lone Star College, Lone Star College, 2005, www.lonestar.edu/stopanimaltesting.htm. Accessed 5 May 2017.

Murnaghan, Ian. "Using Animals for Testing: Pros Versus Cons." Informed Discussion on Animal Welfare in Animal Testing, Using Animals for Testing, 2017, www.aboutanimaltesting.co.uk/using-animals-testing-pros-versus-cons.html. Accessed 5 May 2017.

PETA. "Top Five Reasons to Stop Animal Testing." PETA, PETA, 2014, www.peta.org/blog/top-five-reasons-stop-animal-testing/. Accessed 5 May 2017.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us