The paper "Relevance of Henry Fayol’ s Management Today" is a great example of a case study on management. Management is almost constant in human life. This is because it affects the way one lives and operates to achieve his ambitions. Management is considered a global phenomenon. The management concept is popular and very widely used in human life. Starting from personal life to other economical and social aspects of life like in organizations, businesses, cultural and social, management is being applied to provide direction for various efforts towards achieving a common goal.
According to Fells (2000), “ management is termed as an art that is aimed at getting done following a particular way which involves people are organized in a particular way. ” In that way, management is referred to as a process of creating an environment that is conducive for the people to co-operate and work together for a common purpose. On the other hand, F.W Taylor, “ management is responsible for knowing what to do, when and make sure that it’ s done in the best way possible with very minimal resources (Pryor and Taneja 2010).
The purpose of this essay is to discuss the relevance of Henry Fayol’ s Management in contemporary society. The essay will start by stating if Henry Fayol’ s theory of management is relevant today by giving an overview of what is theory is about, the management principles and functions of his theory, and perhaps the area where his theory exhibits some weakness and the general view of this theory. Despite the numerous changes that have been witnessed in the management aspect of organizations, Fayol’ s Theory of management is still relevant even to today not because of the management principles and functions it has addressed but because it has helped build on the foundation of management where contemporary managers can always refer from.
For example, the 14 principles of management that have been identified by Fayol are very instrumental in creating an environment where work is well organized and people allowed to participate in the operations of the business and more especially where they are best suited. Take an example of the “ division of work” clearly provides leeway on how people at work should be organized for maximum production (Pryor and Taneja 2010).
Berdayes, V 2002, Traditional Management Theory as Panoptic Discourse: Language and the
Constitution of Somatic Flows, Culture & Organization, Vol. 8, No. 1, p. 35-45.
Fells, M 2000, Fayol stands the test of time, Journal of Management History, Vol. 6, No. 8, p 345-360
Kruger, W 2011, Value Based Management, viewed 26th Sept. 2012 from
Parker, L and Ritson, P 2005, “Revisiting Fayol: Anticipating Contemporary Management”, British Journal of Management, vol. 16, p. 175-194.
Pryor, M and Taneja, S 2010, “Henri Fayol, Practitioner and Theoretician – Revered and
Reviled”, Journal of Management History, vol. 16, no. 4, p. 489-503.
Wren, D 2001, “Henri Fayol as strategist: a nineteenth century corporate turnaround”, Management Decision, Vol. 39 No. 6, p. 475-87.
Wren, D., Bedeian, A & Breeze, J 2002, The foundations of Henri Fayol’s administrative theory,
Management Decision, Vol. 40, No. 9, p. 906-918.
Yukl, G and Lespringer, R 2005, Why Integrating the Leading and Managing Roles is Essential for Organisational Effectiveness, Organisational Dynamics, vol. 34, No 4, p. 361-75.