Essays on Brands and Brand Equity - Case of Nestle Case Study

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper "Brands and Brand Equity - Case of Nestle" is a great example of a marketing case study.   Building a strong perceptual position is one way in which Nestle has been operating in the already competitive markets. The image of the company’ s brand remains essential and one of the strategies that Nestle has adopted to align its products with current demands in the areas of operations. Just like its competitors, Nestle has been concerned with reaching even further improvements when it comes to service standards so that their operations can consolidate market niche and specific expertise around the products but not the function.

Nestle produces its products from seven different factories and its operations are headquartered in Mutiara Damansara. In addition to this point, studies from scholars such as Brady et al. (2008) have noted that the perception of Nestle among people continues to grow. As a matter of fact, it is argued that the Brand remains people’ s choice because of the good positioning, To achieve their targets, the company has been managing its brand, putting their focus on logos, packaging, and intangible tenor of emotions from consumers.

Currently, studies have been concerned with different theorists and researches that have been focussing on Brand Equity Models to understand how companies manage their brands. For instance, Kemp et al (2012) have noted that most companies’ business operations are within a competitive marketplace meaning that there is a need to evaluate brand management approaches to ascertain how much it can sustain competitive advantage over its rivals. This view has been supported by the Customer-Based Brand Equity Model that was proposed by Keller (2012).

Based on these arguments, this report provides a succinct analysis of brand management for Nestle within the framework of the Customer-Based Brand Equity Model as suggested by Keller (2012). Customer-Based Brand Equity and its Application in Nestle Brand Management The best approach to understanding how Nestle approaches the management of their brand is relating their brands to Keller’ s Brand Equity Model (Keller, 2012). According to the author, Customer-Based Brand Equity (CBBE) is the situation where companies approach brand management in a manner that the brand is positioned to make customers think and feel in a particular way.

References

Albert, M.M and Lawrence O. H. (2001). Us Versus Them: Oppositional Brand Loyalty and the Cola Wars. Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 28, pp. 355-361.

Brady, M. K, Cronin, J. Joseph, Fox, Gavin L and Roehm, Michelle L. (2008). Strategies to Offset Performance Failures: The Role of Brand Equity. Journal of Retailing, Vol. 84(2), pp. 151-164.

Chen, T., Ma, K., Zheng, C., & Wang, H. (2016). The effects of sub-brands and brand name structure on extension evaluation: An empirical study based on Chinese culture. Journal of Brand Management, 22(8), 695-713.

Edlinger, G. (2015). Employer brand management as boundary‐work: a grounded theory analysis of employer brand managers' narrative accounts. Human Resource Management Journal, 25(4), 443-457.

Ferguson, G., Lau, K. C., & Phau, I. (2016). Brand personality as a direct cause of brand extension success: does self-monitoring matter?. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 33(5).

Goedertier, F., Dawar, N., Geuens, M., & Weijters, B. (2015). Brand typicality and distant novel extension acceptance: How risk-reduction counters low category fit. Journal of business research, 68(1), 157-165.

Gremler, D. D., & Brown, S. W. (1996). Service loyalty: its nature, importance, and implications. Advancing service quality: A global perspective, 5, 171-181.

Jevons, C. (2005). Names, brands, branding: beyond the signs, symbols, products and services. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 14(2), 117-118.

Keller, K. L. (2003). Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity, 2rd edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Keller, K. L. (2012). Understanding the richness of brand relationships: Research dialogue on brands as intentional agents. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(2), 186-190.

Keller, K. L. (2016). Reflections on customer-based brand equity: perspectives, progress, and priorities. AMS Review, 1-16.

Kemp, E., Childers, C. Y., & Williams, K. H. (2012). Place branding: creating self-brand connections and brand advocacy. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 21(7), 508-515.

Kim, K., Park, J., & Kim, J. (2014). Consumer–brand relationship quality: When and how it helps brand extensions. Journal of Business Research, 67(4), 591-597.

Macrae, C., & Uncles, M. D. (1997). Rethinking brand management: the role of “brand chartering”. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 6(1), 64-77.

Michel, G., & Donthu, N. (2014). Why negative brand extension evaluations do not always negatively affect the brand: The role of central and peripheral brand associations. Journal of Business Research, 67(12), 2611-2619.

Nam, Janghyeon, Ekinci, Yuksel and Whyatt, Georgina. (2011). Brand Equity, Brand Loyalty and Consumer Satisfaction. Annals of Tourism Research, Vol. 38(3), pp. 1009-1030.

Ponnam, A., & Balaji, M. S. (2015). Investigating the effects of product innovation and ingredient branding strategies on brand equity of food products. British Food Journal, 117(2), 523-537.

Riezebos, R., Riezebos, H. J., Kist, B., & Kootstra, G. (2003). Brand management: A theoretical and practical approach. Pearson Education.

Rose, J. (2015). The Effects of Brand Familiarity on Perceived Risks, Attitudes, and Purchase Intentions toward Intimate Apparel Brands: The Case of Victoria'Secret (Doctoral dissertation, UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS).

Velavan, C., Kumar, S. N., & Raj, S. V. (2015). A Study on Brand Preference and Brand Switching Behaviour of Bt Cotton Farmers in Andhra Pradesh. Indian Journal of Marketing, 45(11), 17-28.

Wood, L. (2000). Brands and brand equity: definition and management. Management decision, 38(9), 662-669.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us