Essays on Impact of Family Relationship Dynamics during Transitions Capstone Project

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper "Impact of Family Relationship Dynamics during Transitions" is an outstanding example of a management capstone project.   The paper intends to investigate the dynamics of family businesses and family farms. The impact of family relationship dynamics on business-owning families particularly during transitions has been deeply analyzed in the study in the context of a small accountancy firm with eight staff members and family members comprising a father, three sons, and a daughter. Much attention has recently been drawn to the differences found among non-family firms and family firms. In many families, it is obvious that business tends to serve family and conversely, the family also serves the businesses.

In some of the business families, economic prudence dominates the process of the decision-making process while other family firms recognize the requirement of responding to family and economic considerations. In this paper, specific attention is paid to family and their business and the tasks and issues required during their succession processes. The need for preparing a succession plan has been augmented and the necessary training of successor has also been emphasized.

Many family businesses differ from prudence economic enterprises in their values and working operations as such the policymaker are required to be flexible during intervening for helping such community, particularly small and medium enterprise communities. Paper qualitatively explores the characteristics and effects of family relationship dynamics in family business systems undertaking the transfer of controlling ownership to the future generation like transferring control and ownership from father to son. The necessary anxiety imperatives and their management in the transition process have been discussed thoroughly with the conclusion about the characteristics of emotional dynamics in business-owning families. Chapter-1 Introduction Most of the developed countries have moved progressively from agricultural-based society to an industrial-based or information society.

Specifically, the latter half of the twentieth century is marked by a deterioration of communal circumstances in most industrialized countries. As such the combination of both these elements has presented some serious threats to the economy.


Aldrich, H., & Cliff, J. (2003). The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship:

Toward a family embeddedness perspective. Journal of Business Venturing.

Anderson, E.W. (1998) Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychological Bulleting, 103(3), 411-423

Astrachan, J. (2003). The emergence of a field. Commentary on the special issue of

Journal of Business Venturing – The evolving family/entrepreneurship relationship. Journal of Business Venturing

Babakus, E. (1992) An Empirical Assessment of the SERVUAL Scale. Journal of Business Research, 24(3), 253-268

Bagozzi, R. (1994) Structural Equation Models in Marketing Research: Basic Principles. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.

Barney, J.B (2002). Where does entrepreneurship come from: Network models of opportunity recognition and resource acquisition with application to the family firm? Paper presented at Second Annual Conference on Theories of the Family Enterprise, Philadelphia, December.

Carlock, R.S., & Ward, J.S. 2001. Strategic planning for the family business: Parallel

planning to unify the family and business. MacMillan, Limited.

Carmines, E. (1991). Analyzing Models with Unobserved Variables: Analysis of Covariance Structures. Beverly Hills: Sage

Carney, Michael. (2007). Minority Family Business in Emerging Markets: Organization Forms and Competitive Advantage. Family Business Review, 20(4), 289-300

Chua, J.H., Chrisman, J.J., and Sharma, P. (2002). Family and non-family priorities in family

firms: Preliminary evidence: University of Calgary Press.

Danes, S.M. (2006). Tensions within Family Business-owning Couples over Time. Stress, Trauma and Crisis, 9(3-4), 227-246.

Danes, S.M., & Morgan, E.A. (2004). Family business-owning couples: An EFT view into their unique conflict culture. Contemporary Family Therapy, 26(3), 241-260.

Danes, S.M., Stafford, K., & Loy, J. T. (2007). Family business performance: The effects of gender and management. Journal of Business Research, 60 (10), 1058-1069.

Davis, P., & Stern, D. (1980). Adaptation, survival, and growth of the family business: An

integrated systems perspective, Human Relations, 34(4), 207-224.

Dillman, D. A. (1978). Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York: Wiley-Interscience

Fletcher, Denise E. (2002). Understanding the Small Family Business. London: Routledge. 108-126

Fukuyama, Francis, (1999). The Great Disruption. New York: The Free Press.

Habbershon, T.G., & Williams, M. (1999). A Resource-Based framework for assessing the

strategic advantages of family firms. Family Business Review, 12, 1-25.

Haberman, H. R., & Danes, S. M. (2007). Father-daughter and father-son family business management transfer comparison: Family FIRO Model Application. Family Business Review, 20(2), 163-184.

Hair, J.F. (1998) Multivariate Data Analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall

Halpin G. (1994) Effects of Number and Type of Response Choices of Internal Consistency Reliability. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79(3), 928-930.

Heck, R. K. Z., & Trent, E. S. (1999). The prevalence of family business from a

household sample. Family Business Review, 12(3), 209-224.

Hess, Edward D. (2005). The Successful Family Business: A Proactive Plan for Managing the Family and the Business. Bradford: Praeger Publishers. 146-160

Jensen, M.C., & Meckling, W.H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360

Kline, R.b. (1998). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Guilford Press.

Knapp, Amy. (2006). 2006-2007 Amy Knapp's Family Organizer. Sheffield: Calendar Systems. 38-55

Lee, Yoon, Hong, Gong-Soog and Rowe, Barbara. (2006). Impact of Family Relationships on Attitudes of the Second Generation in Family Business. Journal of Family and Economic Issues. 72-91

Litz, R. A. (1995). The family business: Toward definitional clarity. Family Business

Review, 8(2), 71-81

Montemerlo, Daniela. (2005). The Family Constitution: Agreements to Secure and Perpetuate Your Family and Your Business. Radial Publishers: Durham. 56-72

Paulhus, D.L (1991). Measurement and Control of Response Bias. Toronto: Academic Press

Pieper, Torsten M.and Klein, Sabine B. (2007). The Bulleye: A Systems Approach to Modeling Family Firms. Family Business Review, 20(4), 301-319

Romano, C.A., Tanewski, G.A., & Smyrnios, K.X. (2000). Capital Structure Decision

Making: A Model for Family Business, Journal of Business Venturing, 16, 285-310.

Ross, S. (1973). The economic theory of agency: The principal’s problem. American Economic Review, 63, 134-139.

Sharma, P., & Irving, G. (2002). Four shades of family business successor commitment:

Motivating factors and expected outcomes. Family Firm Institute Conference, Dallas

Sirmon, D., & Hitt, M. (2003). Managing resources: Linking unique resources,

management and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice.

Stafford, K., Duncan, K., Danes, S., & Winter, M. (1999). A research model of sustainable

family businesses. Family Business Review. 12, 197-208.

Steier, L. (2003) Variants of agency contracts in family financed ventures as a

continuum of familial altruistic and market rationalities. Journal of Business Venturing

Steenkamp, J. (1991) The Use of LISREL in Validating Marketing Constructs. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 8(4), 283-299

Tagiuri, R and Davis, J A (1982) Bivalent attributes of the family firm. Family Business Review Vol. Ix, no. 2. Pp.199-208

Tsang, E. (2002). Learning from overseas venturing experience: The case of Chinese family

businesses. Journal of Business Venturing. 17, 21-40.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us