The paper “ Prescriptive Ethics - Social and Environmental Sustainability, Cultural Understanding" is a motivating version of an essay on ethics. Basically, handling a moral and ethical way of thinking is coping with 'prescriptive ethics', which is based on the interest of how people are supposed to act. In life experience, I understand that ethical encounters can take place at three distinct phases of generality while in each of the three phases; there can be a debate, disagreement, obligation, as well as analysis. According to Cohen (2004), the phases are strongly connected, but ironically they are incredibly highly unlike; therefore, they must not be conflated or confused.
From the least common to the most wide-ranging, there are only three phases: normative issues, normative principles, as well as moralizing. Economically, I suppose that a cost-effective assumption is offered for the public wellbeing since growth will fuel demand, and ubiquitously distribute relieve and development; therefore, no jingoist or an ethical person might go up against it (Pfeffer, 2013, p. 36). However, the growth nature, on the contrary, for instance, to aged concepts like nurturing, is that it is immediately adrift and considerably spontaneous in the never-ending demand for every ineffectual thing globally (Freeman, 2005, p. 114).
I suppose, Adam Smith would be desperate to find the manner in which the inventiveness, as well as our businesses’ energies at the moment, are frequently directed to such inconsequential endings. Personal experienceEssentially, the use of fast advancing domains of hardware and software engineering as well as biotechnology to restructure intellect or life raises social issues. I believe there is a moral responsibility producer side to make sure that the virtual pet or robot does not damage social standards.
Furthermore, I would not assume that there is no effect of new-fangled technology on the society; given that, creation of robots leads to substitution of manpower, which economically reduces costs, but socially leads to unemployment within the society. However, in my view, I understand that new job opportunities in the IT industry are generated, given that there has been a logical fear of automation introduction in the industry. In the real sense, automated looms were developed to perform the same task as the weavers: this sent thousands of employees packing immediately after the introduction of the machines.
This is apparent in the banking industry, whereby thousands of bank staff lost their jobs after the introduction of automated tellers machines (ATM). Pursuant to the introduction of robots, it was notable that industries with demanding workforce were fast to implement the application of robotic technologies with the aim of improving efficiency, effectiveness, security as well as their financial system. I know robots can operate non-stop, and repairing them is uncomplicated plus they do not need employees amenities, but substituting workers with robots is socially unethical even if the perceived robots reduce costs of labor, as well as union influence (Cohen, 2004, p. 8).
Everyone will concur with me that the substitution of people by computerized systems lead to redundancy within the society, in particular for the minority groups and substandard employees, which in turn, leads to long-standing joblessness. Social and environmental sustainabilityPresently, with environmental setbacks, particularly climate change, which was poised to become dominant political, economic, and social setbacks in our modern world (Sandhu, 2010, p. 286).
Thus, I expect as well corporate conservationism to gain ever-increasing significance as a key premeditated issue for companies, across the world. Large and more visible companies are expected in the coming years to be compelled to move further than the stage of regulatory compliance. Mackey (2013) cautions that environmental setbacks presently as well as in the future cannot be exclusively handled at operational echelon; rather public demands can progressively compel business organizations to move further than regulatory acquiescence as well as toward enforcing a tactical positive approach to such setbacks.
Seemingly, businessmen are the most reasonable people, which indicate entity managers or business directors (Haanaes et al. , 2013, p. 112). I have noted that nearly all of the debate concerning social responsibility is aimed at business organizations, thus, mostly corporate executives are more important when it comes to social and environmental sustainability (Mackey, 2013, p. 34).