The paper "Can Managers Exercise Their Managerial Prerogative without Interference from Actors in Employment" is a perfect example of management coursework. The issue as to whether managers can exercise their managerial prerogative without interference from actors in employment has been discussed by various stakeholders within the business sector. In this case, there are two sides to the argument. One side constitutes the managers themselves while the other side consists of the actors in the employment relations. Majority of the actors in employment relations assert that managers cannot exercise their managerial prerogative on their own.
On the other hand, the managers argue that they are capable of carrying out their managerial duties without these external interferences. This paper is dealing with this issue in depth. Managers can actually not exercise their managerial prerogative without interference from actors in employment relations. These actors include trade unions, employees and the state. The reason why managers cannot exercise their managerial rights without such interferences is that these other stakeholders are directly or indirectly linked to their management. (Garth and Jennifer, 1998) For example, the state puts in place policies concerning the running of businesses.
This includes policies concerning the starting of business. This is where managers have to officially register the business. Other policies include those that govern the payment of taxes by the business. There are still other policies that relate to the way managers carry out their responsibilities in relation to their employees. There are policies that govern the steps that a foreign business can start up a branch within the nation. All these steps always have to be followed for the organisation to be in harmony with the state.
This includes terms of employment, payments and even the employee-employer relations. There are many cases where employers violate these rules and regulations set by the government. For instance, the state always has to ensure that all managers pay taxes. Each and every organisation has to prepare documents on an annual basis. These documents clearly show the number of profits that were accrued in the financial year. There are some managers who are so crafty such that they don’ t give in the right figures. Each state usually has employees who have to carry out auditing in the organisations.
In this case, this venture is carried out to ensure that correct figures are submitted and that there is no embezzlement of funds. This means that there is no way that managers can carry out their managerial prerogative without interference from the state. In case this happens, then many business organisations will not pay tax or not give the required amount. This will result in a nation without sufficient resources to run its endeavours. The state is forced to interfere with the managerial prerogative concerning payment of salaries and wages to employees.
Every state has got rules and regulations concerning the payment of salaries and wages. This concerns the amount in relation to the job group. This also concerns when managers should pay their employees. There are some organisations which don’ t pay employees on time. Others still underpay employees. This forces the state to come in. Therefore the interference by the state is very healthy because, at the end of the day, fairness is enhanced. (Hilltop, 1994)