The paper 'Joanne Uses Heroine and Was Found Stealing at a Shopping Center" is a good example of a management case study. Case management is an important concept that is used for providing interventions to people involved in social issues such as crime and drug abuse. The interventions are usually made possible through the use of different models that are in place. The nature of the problem facing an individual determines the model that can be used for the intervention. The intervention model requires support from stakeholders such as the justice system and the treatment system (Roberts, 2013).
This is considering that the problem facing the individuals may require treatment and rehabilitation. The paper is case management related to an individual known as Joanne who uses heroin and was found stealing at a shopping center. Comparison and Contrast Joanne has a problem with drug addiction, stealing and causing violence. Treatment Alternative to Street Crime (TASC) is one of the models that can be used for the purposes of providing assistance to Joanne. This model links crime to drug abuse which is also the case for Joanne.
The model requires various resources which aim at ensuring that it is successful. The justice system is linked with the treatment when using this model (Rapp, Van Den Noortgate, Broekaert & Vanderplasschen, 2014). It requires several organizational as well as operational elements for it to be successful. A lot of support is required from the justice system in order to facilitate the continuous communication process. A link has to be created between the justice system and the treatment system through the establishment of a protocol in order to deal with the addiction and steal problem that Joanne has.
An administrator, as well as a number of staff members, will be required to carry out the process. A lot of data will have to be collected in order to facilitate the process. Physical tests will also be carried out on the client to determine the levels of drug use. The client will have to be retained in the treatment through the use of criminal leverage. Technology may also be used for the purposes of monitoring the client through the use of this method.
The use of this model has been successful in terms of dealing with the women offenders (James, Stams, Asscher, De Roo & van der Laan, 2013). It will, however, require a lot of coordination between different personnel. Prison inmates who have a history of drug addiction and crimes such as stealing may have a lot of difficulties in terms of reintegrating back to society. As a result of this, they always find themselves going back to drugs or crime. The situation for the client may be the same as she has a history of drugs.
Assertive community treatment model can be used for the client as it will have future benefits. This model does not require many linkages between the justice system and the treatment system as in the case of TASC. However, it requires a multidisciplinary team to carry out a different process (Scott & Dennis, 20120). This, therefore, means that a lot of coordination will be between the multidisciplinary team. The model does not require many resources in terms of the personnel and hence its cost-effectiveness.
The counsellors may, however, require some access to the instrumental support for the clients. This is important as the client is a single mother and does not have a steady source of income. The client may also be required to join the support groups when this method is used. It, therefore, requires a lot of interactions between the clients and the other people with similar problems. A face to face contact between the client and the counsellors is important during the process (Miller, Copeland & Sullivan, 2015). This means that resources have to be provided for the purpose of ensuring that the counsellors are able to visit the clients on a daily basis.
Rapp, R. C., Van Den Noortgate, W., Broekaert, E., & Vanderplasschen, W. (2014). The efficacy of case management with persons who have substance abuse problems: A three-level meta-analysis of outcomes. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 82(4), 605.
Scott, C. K., & Dennis, M. L. (2012). The first 90 days following release from jail: Findings from the Recovery Management Checkups for Women Offenders (RMCWO) experiment. Drug and alcohol dependence, 125(1), 110-118.
Guydish, J., Chan, M., Bostrom, A., Jessup, M. A., Davis, T. B., & Marsh, C. (2011). A randomized trial of probation case management for drug-involved women offenders. Crime & Delinquency, 57(2), 167-198.
Roberts, J. (2013). Women-centred: the West Mercia community-based programme for women offenders. Women and Punishment, 110.
Hendricks, P. S., Clark, C. B., Johnson, M. W., Fontaine, K. R., & Cropsey, K. L. (2014). Hallucinogen use predicts reduced recidivism among substance- involved offenders under community corrections supervision. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 28(1), 62-66.
Schwalbe, C. S., Gearing, R. E., MacKenzie, M. J., Brewer, K. B., & Ibrahim, R. (2012). A meta-analysis of experimental studies of diversion programs for juvenile offenders. Clinical psychology review, 32(1), 26-33.
Hanson, R. K., Letourneau, E. J., Olver, M. E., Wilson, R. J., & Miner, M. H. (2012). Incentives for offender research participation are both ethical and practical. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39(11), 1391-1404.
Sacks, S., Chaple, M., Sacks, J. Y., McKendrick, K., & Cleland, C. M. (2012). Randomized trial of a reentry modified therapeutic community for offenders with co-occurring disorders: Crime outcomes. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 42(3), 247-259.
James, C., Stams, G. J. J., Asscher, J. J., De Roo, A. K., & van der Laan, P. H. (2013). Aftercare programs for reducing recidivism among juvenile and young adult offenders: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 33(2), 263-274.
Miller, J., Copeland, K., & Sullivan, M. (2015). Keeping Them Off the Corner How Probation Officers Steer Offenders Away From Crime Opportunities. The Prison Journal.