The paper “ Corporate Level Strategy - Disputes between Four Water Corporations in Tasmania” is an exciting variant of case study on management. The case study is mainly focused on the address of corporate strategic management issues. The company and /or corporation is TasWater formation as a result of the merger of four initial water corporations. The decision to merge the four corporations emanates from discontent among the owners and the boards of directors of the four companies. The disgruntled members feel the current structures are not efficient in the provision of the services in an efficient and prudent manner.
According (West & jones 1997), the management roles include directing, controlling, supervision and recruitment of new workers to the corporation. There is a feeling that the owners are not directly involved in the appointment of members to the board. This is disrespectful on their part. Policy issues and pricing strategies are done without the input of the owners. The case study clearly identifies the problems facing the owners and then the problems and or issues being raised by the boards of the four corporations.
Sound discussions, practical solutions, and applicable recommendations are captured in the case study. The solution to the disagreements and disconnection between the owners and the board is a result of a lack of communication and formal engagements between the two sides. FindingsThe case study focuses on the wrangles among four Water Corporation in Tasmania. The four water corporations are Southern Water, Cradle Mountain water, Ben Lomond Water, and Onstream water corporations. The TasWater Corporation is expected to commence its operations from 1st July 2013. Due to competition and inefficiency in the provision of the water as a social facility, the decision has been amicably been reached to merge the four water corporations into one corporation (Sherman & Hart 2006).
Merging of corporations is a good idea so as to benefit from the economies of scale and of scope. The merging will bring about the linking of expertise from the four corporations to achieve great results for the TasWater Corporations (Kurtz& Boone 2011). success in most corporations as a result of wide consultation amongst the corporations’ experts and technocrats. This will lead to efficient and informed decision making in the corporation.
Access to water is a fundamental right and not a privilege to the citizens of a country. Water is crucial to the running of industries. To briefly say, water is life to both human beings and industries. Without water, human beings will not survive. The same case applies to the industries. The state authorizes the corporations with the mandate to provide scarce resources efficiently. Water is a public utility and inefficient provision of the public utility will lead to widespread condemnation. The decision to merge the four water corporations is a product of the imminent need to optimally utilize the available facilities to provide efficient services.
Utility in the access of public utility emanates from the efficiency and reliability in the access and safety of the public utility. Most governments do not leave the provision of the basic essential commodities to the large public. This is due to the fear of inefficiency and eventual collapse of the separate corporations (Pride, Hughes, Kapoor 2012).