Essays on In What Ways Are Sergey Brin, Larry Page, and Eric Schmidt Managers Assignment

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper "In What Ways Are Sergey Brin, Larry Page, and Eric Schmidt Managers" is a good example of a management assignment.   Leadership and management seem to be two distinct, nevertheless complementary systems in organizations (Nelson, Quick, Wright & Adams, 2012). Management involves planning, budgeting, controlling, organizing, staffing and problem-solving. Good and effective management in the organization directs the complexity of an organization and its surrounding environment. For companies to be successful in the modern business world they need effective leadership as well as management. The friction that exists between the two is that one seems to be seeking innovation ad change through effective leadership, and at the same time advocating for efficiency and stability through the use of management skills.

At times some companies may require greater management than leadership at different stages and the vice versa also seems to be true (Nelson, Quick, Wright & Adams, 2012). Thus, leaders and manager need to know whether an organization calls for leadership or management and apply it accordingly. Based on the case study Brin, Page and Schmidt depict themselves as managers in one way or another.

Schmidt can be termed as being more of a manger when compared to the founders of the company. The two founders were aware that they needed a more management focus and thus the need to hire a manager (Hamel, 2006). Schmidt was recruited in 2001 and he played the supervisory role the two visionaries. Being a former CEO, Schmidt offered the needed management function at Google and his main focus was to management the two vice presidents of the company as well as the sales organization. Schmidt’ s also demonstrates his role of being managed by setting the overall agenda of the company, and he is the one who offers the direction of workdays issues that the founders seem to have neglected or sidelined and in most instances, he reminds Brin and Page to behave.

His management skills and prowess are as a result of his substantial experience that he had over the years by working at Sun Microsystems and Novell before joining Google. Page and Brin also demonstrated their management skills in the departments that they were heading.

Brin focused and managed the engineering sections as well as the business deals. Page, on the other hand, headed the engineering and product management. This clear division of role between the CEO and the two-founders ensured that there was no conflict between and that boundaries have been set to ensure the effective running of the organization and they meet daily to deliberate on management issues in the company. Question 2: In what ways is Brin, Page, and Schmidt leaders? Leadership tends to drive the change in an organization and a healthy organization required good management and effective leadership.

A leadership process in an organization creates change and uncertainty. Effective leaders control an organizations future and at the same time act as a change enabler by distributing the already existing patterns of behaviors and promote the novel ideas and therefore assist the organizational members in making sense of the changes that are occurring in the organization (Nelson, Quick, Wright & Adams, 2012). The founders of the company, Brin and Page tend to demonstrate their leadership more than the management aspect when they sat and decided and founded Google in 1998.

They had the ability to set up the company and believe in themselves and this shows that they had and depicted qualities of being leaders in a business scenario.

References

Dudley, B. (2007, June 11). The lure of great Google perks. The Seattle Times. Retrieved from http://www.seattletimes.com/business/the-lure-of-great-google-perks/

Guynn, J. (2008, September 7). Marissa Mayer talks about Google at 10 -- and 20. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/technology/2008/09/marissa-mayer-t.html

Hamel, G. (2006, April 26). Management a la Google. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB114601763677436091

Jessica, E & Morrison, S (2008, December 3). Google gears down for tougher times. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB122826503489174369

Kopytoff, V. (2005, December 18). How Google woos the best and brightest. The San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved from: http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/How-Google-woos-the-best-and-brightest-2587916.php

La Monica, P. R. (2009, March 25). Google’s top bosses keep their dollar salaries. The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved from http://www.smh.com.au/news/technology/biztech/googles-top-bosses-keep-their-dollar-salaries/2009/03/25/1237656979514.html

Lussier, R., & Achua, C. (2014). Leadership: Theory, Application and Skill Development. Ohio: Cengage Learning.

Manimala, M & Wasdani, K. (June 2013). Distributed Leadership at Google: Lessons from the billion-dollar brand. Ivey Business Journal. Retrieved from http://iveybusinessjournal.com/publication/distributed-leadership-at-google-lessons-from-the-billion-dollar-brand/

Nelson, D.L. & Quick, J.C. (2009). Organizational science, the real world, and you. Ohio: South-Western Cengage Learning.

Nelson, D.L., Quick, J.C., Wright, S. & Adams, C. (2012). ORGB (Asia Pacific Ed.). South Melbourne, Vic: Cengage Learning Australia

Parker, L Oct 3, 2014, Google’s adult supervision, Eric Schmidt, got schooled by the founders on leadership. Silicon Valley Business Journal. Retrieved from http://www.bizjournals.com/sanjose/news/2014/10/03/googles-adult-supervision-eric-schmidt-got.html

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us