The paper "Maria River Land Use Sustainability at New South Wales" is a perfect example of a business case study. The idea of sustainability focuses on the equilibrium of the community, financial system and the atmosphere in which all living things live for present and future well being of the future generation. These endeavors to make sure that those resources are made readily available for all to thrive in the present world. The adoption of research and operations is the main goal for a community to remain vibrant and responsible economically. The essay endeavors to look at Maria River land-use sustainability in New South Wales, Australia.
The report begins with the illustration of situation analysis, key actors in value of a conflict, the knowledge contested, competing interests, institutional barriers, and in the end give a recommendation and a conclusion. 2.0 The situation analysis of Maria River The government of Australia initiated land reclamation. The New South Wale coastal plains have been reclaimed to permit setting up agricultural tasks. At the same time, it is a way of mitigating flood and guarding communities against floods.
This process has resulted in the extensive acidification of water in the ground and drainage systems because of Acid Sulfate Soils (ASS) oxidation. Acid discharges from this type of soil are a problem that has posed a threat to the ecosystem around the river. This has impacted industries depending on the estuarine system and consequently the livelihoods of coastal communities (Hicks et al. , 1999) 3.0 Land-use Discord in the Maria River 3.1 Stakeholder Motives values of conflict Whereas it is apparent that existing agrarian systems are considerably breaking down the Maria River and instigating harsh economic fatalities for an assortment of stakeholders.
This changing condition is until now not achieved owing to farmers’ defiance against a transformed drainage system. Presently, a lot of dairy and beef farmers decline to recognize that there is an acid soil predicament and that they are responsible for these effects. Their agrarian systems are indefensible; they are reluctant to collaborate and to embrace the instigated administration approaches (Woodhead, 1999). Woodhead (1999, p16) illustrated on a number of numerous cases in some catchment areas such as Macleay Hastings that farmers have faith in the added drainage system of the land, and wishing for deep numerous drains.
They state that drainage is the best flood mitigation solution. The conflict is stimulated by the lingering disagreement amid administration, users of the estuarine, and farmers. This is an underlying obstacle to unbeaten treatment of acid soils (Tulau, 2000). With the arrival of lawsuit pressure and the possibility of insolvency, this disagreement amid stakeholders is perpetually augmenting (Adams, 2001). 3.2 Contested Knowledge Despite the efforts made by the government to put into practice technical strategies, farmers are adamant.
This is an impediment to the implementation. The administration of NSW is presently in the way of putting implementing planned technical stratagem on a nation-wide-approach. Nevertheless, a lot of farmers are not flexible to keep the status quo; an awkward viewpoint on the administration. This is demonstrating to be a considerable obstacle to the successful execution of projected stratagem. This circumstance is most clear in the beef and dairy firms which make up the mainstream of land use in the Maria River. Administration, farmers and estuarine clients on the Hastings catchment and the Maria River in specific have conflicts on many instances.
Obstinate landowners have confirmed to be the major obstruction to the execution of projects for rehabilitation in the Hastings and Maria River (Hicks et al, 1999).