Essays on Potential and Limitations of the Strategy Implementation Tools Coursework

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper "Potential and Limitations of the Strategy Implementation Tools" is an outstanding example of coursework on business.   To date, strategy implementation has developed quite independently and separately from project management. But, there are various opportunities between the two that are under-exploited in theory and practice. A considerable number of tools used in strategic management, organizational change, and value management can equally be imported into the project management niche to enrich the traditional techniques. Strategy implementation tools are particularly powerful when used in complex and multi-functional projects (Draft & Lane, 2008, p.

406). Apart from being used to turn business strategies into implementation, these tools can be imported and used in the management practice of the mainstream project. The essay highlights a critical analysis of the potential and limitations of the strategy implementation tools. Part 1: Governance and stakeholdersCorporate governance is considered a system that allows companies to be controlled and directed. The objective of corporate governance is traditionally conceptualized by the principal-agency theory. Over-emphasis on the share price information and profit maximization is thought to be one of the major root causes of the governance crises the world over.

From a political perspective, corporate governance is often dependent on the consent given by those governed (Fernando, 2009, p. 7). The consent of the governed in turn refers to democratic principles such as political debate and separation of powers. The political view has been taken up by the stakeholder theory that argues that stakeholders are critical tools for the survival of an organization. Consequently, the stakeholders need to be considered in the systems they control and direct (Fernando, 2009, p.

50). Stakeholders often include individuals or groups of people that depend on an organization in order to fulfill their goals and on whom the organization depends. A good example of common stakeholders includes the owners/shareholders, the financial community, activist groups, customers, managers, unions, local community, employees, trade associations, competitors, suppliers, government, political groups, and the media.


Cummings, T. & Worley, C., 2014. Organisation Development and Change. 1st ed. New York: Cengage Learning.

Draft, R. L. & Lane, P. G., 2008. The leadership experience. 4th ed. Mason, OH: Thomson/South-Western.

Fernando, A. C., 2009. Corporate governance : principles, policies and practices. 1st ed. New Delhi: Pearson Education.

Girotra, K. & Netessine, S., 2014. The risk-driven business model: four questions that will define your company. 1st ed. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business Review Press.

Meyer, T. G., 2012. Path Dependence in Two-sided Markets: A Simulation Study on Technological Path Dependence with an Application to Platform Competition in the Smartphone Industry, New York: s.n.

Pfister, J., 2009. Managing organizational culture for effective internal control: from practice to theory. 1st ed. Berlin: Physica; London: Springer.

Schein, E. H., 2010. Organizational culture and leadership. 4th ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Sherman, A. J., 2011. Franchising & licensing: two powerful ways to grow your business in any economy. 4th ed. New York: American Management Association.

Spadaccini, M., 2007. Business structures. 1st ed. Irvine, CA: Entrepreneur Press.

Taylor, J., 2006. A survival guide for project managers. 2nd ed. New York: American Management Association.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us