Essays on Institutional Change Management Strategy Designed for Adoption by Public Hospital Case Study

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper “ Institutional Change Management Strategy Designed for Adoption by Public Hospital” is a well-turned example of the case study on management. In the age of globalization where information is available to everyone and from numerous sources and when technology has invaded every aspect of human life, these two changes have impacted hospitals just as much as they have any other organization in the world today (Uhl-Bien, Marion & McKelvey, 2007; Bazzoli, Dynan, Burns & Yap, 2004). To begin with, the information age has created an informed clientele for most organizations, in the hospital’ s case an informed patient base.

Hospitals are no longer the kind of institutions they were a decade ago when there was minimal interaction between patients and the caregivers and other medical staff employed at a hospital (Bazzoli, Dynan, Burns & Yap, 2004). Then, a patient neither wanted to know anything about the choices their doctors and nurses made during treatment nor needed interaction with the medical team attending them at a personal level. Currently, however, patients have become more involved in their treatment (Bazzoli, Dynan, Burns & Yap, 2004).

They are more informed to a point of demanding to know the alternative treatments available, and the most viable alternative for them. They demand to make the choices themselves based on the advice given (Bazzoli, Dynan, Burns & Yap, 2004). Secondly, organizations have had to adopt modern technology in their equipment and communication. Of particular concern is the adoption of computer technology and all the technologies accruing from the computer platform such as the internet. Hospitals have had to learn how to communicate with their patients via the internet using emails and in their websites (Bazzoli, Dynan, Burns & Yap, 2004).

Hospitals have to build an online presence as well as reply to numerous inquiries and comments sent to them by their patients or prospective patients in emails (Bazzoli, Dynan, Burns & Yap, 2004). The hospital under analysis was established between 1938 and 1945, in pre-world war II Europe. The hospital has survived with protocols and policies established then to offer services to patients until today.


Armenakis, Achilles & Bedeian, A. (1999). Organizational Change: A Review of Theory and

Research in the 1990's. Journal of Management, Vol. 25 (3), pp. 293-315.

Lazuli, G., Dylan, L., Burns, L. & Yap, C. (2004). Two Decades of Organizational Change

in Health Care: What Have we Learned? Medical Care Resource Review. Vol. 61 (3). pp. 247 - 331.

Bordia, P., Jones, E., Gallois, C., Callan, J. & DiFonzo, N. (2006). Management Are Aliens!:

Rumors and Stress during Organizational Change. Group Organization Management. Vol. 31 (5). pp. 601 - 621.

Burke, W. (2007). Organization Change: Theory and Practice, London: Sage Publications.

Collins, J. (2001). Good to great: why some companies make the leap... And others don't.

New York: Collins Business.

Daft, R. & Weick, K. (1984). "Toward a Model of Organizations as Interpretation Systems."

Academy of Management Review, Vol. 9 (3). pp. 284-295.

Elias, S. (2009).Employee Commitment in Times of Change: Assessing the Importance of

Attitudes Toward Organizational Change. Journal of Management. Vol. 35 (1). pp. 37 - 55.

Grunberg, L., Moore, S., Greenberg, E. & Sikora, P. (2008). The Changing Workplace and

Its Effects: A Longitudinal Examination of Employee Responses at a Large Company. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. Vol. 44 (2). pp. 215 - 236.

Kegan, R. (1982). The evolving self: problem and process in human development.

Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Kouzes, J. & Posner, B. (2003). Credibility: How leaders gain and lose it, why people

demand it. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

MCNamara, C. (2009). Basic Context for Organizational Change. Free Management

Library. Retrieved May 21, 2010. From

Milliken, F. (2002). Understanding Organizational Adaptation to Change: The Case of

Work-Family Issues. New York: EBSCO Publishing.

Neves, P. & Caetano, A. (2009). Commitment to Change: Contributions to Trust in the

Supervisor and Work Outcomes. Group Organization Management, Vol. 34 (6). pp. 623 - 644.

Poole, M. (2000). Organizational change and innovation processes: theory and methods

for research. New York: Oxford University Press.

Palmer, I., Dunford, R. & Akin, G. (2008). Managing organizational change: a multiple

perspectives approach. New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin.

Saksvik, B. & Hetland, H. (2009). Exploring Dispositional Resistance to Change. Journal of

Leadership and Organizational Studies. Vol. 16 (2). pp. 175 - 183.

Scharmer, C.O. (2007). Theory U: Leading from the future as it emerges. Cambridge, MA:

The Society for Organizational Learning.

Schraeder, M., Swamidass, P. & Morrison, R. (2006). Employee Involvement, Attitudes and

Reactions to Technology Changes. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies. Vol. 12 (3). pp. 85 - 100.

Senior, B & Swailes, S. (2005). Organizational Change. Ottawa: Pearson Education Canada.

Torbert, W. (2004). Action inquiry: The secret of timely and transforming leadership. San

Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

Quinn, R. (2004). Building the bridge as you walk on it: A guide for leading change. San

Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Quinn, R., Spreitzer, G. & Brown, M. (2000). Changing others through changing ourselves,

Journal of Management Inquiry, Vol. 9 (2), pp. 147-164.

Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R. & McKelvey, B. (2007). Complexity leadership theory: Shifting

leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 18 (4). pp. 298-318.

Weber, P. & Manning, M. (2001). Cause Maps, Sensemaking, and Planned Organizational

Change. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. Vol. 37 (2).pp. 227 - 251.

Whelan-Berry, K., Gordon, J. & Hinings, C. (2003). Strengthening Organizational Change

Processes: Recommendations and Implications from a Multilevel Analysis. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. Vol. 39 (2). pp. 186 - 207.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us