The paper 'Understanding Work Teams Communication and Leadership' is a great example of a Management Case Study. Groups and teams are major characteristics of organizational life. It is believed that the majority of the organization’ s practices need a lot of coordination through working as a team and a group. It is because of this that managers are expected to understand the concept of group behavior and teamwork (Chaneta, 2013). Communication plays an important role in terms of ensuring that an organization is able to meet its goals and objectives.
The communication process is important within an organization for the purpose of controlling the behaviors of the members (Von Groddeck, 2011). This ensures that the organization is able to move in the specified direction and hence achieve its goals and objectives. The communication process ensures that the managers are able to pass information to the employees or the other staff members. Communication is thus considered as the most vital aspect of running an organization as it determines how operations in the company will be conducted. The leadership of an organization is important in terms of the development of the goals and objectives.
Leaders within an organization are responsible for developing the goals and objectives of the organization. In most cases, the success of an organization is usually attributed to the leaders of the organization (Zhang, 2011). This means that the leaders have to put in place measures that will ensure that their organizations are able to steer the organization to success. On the other hand, the leaders are responsible for guiding the operations of the employees. This paper, therefore, seeks to discuss the topics; foundations of group behavior, and understanding work teams, communication, and leadership.
It also seeks to employ research and analysis in discussing the strengths and weaknesses of the topics to the organization’ s managers. The paper will finally present the current examples of organizational behavior being reported in the media. Review of the Topic Foundations of group behavior and understanding work teams Foundations of group behavior Group behavior refers to a situation in which individuals interact or relate in either large or small numbers so as to achieve particular objectives. The interaction can either be formal or informal, thus resulting in two types of groups, which are informal and formal groups.
Formal groups refer to groups that are usually structured by the organization so as to undertake work in support of the goals and objectives of the organization. Under formal groups, the behaviors of group members are usually restricted by and directed toward organizational goals. Informal groups on the other hand are groups that develop to attain social or affiliation requirements, through bringing individuals together on the basis of either friendship or shared interests (Pranit, 2012). When individuals interact in either large or small numbers, they normally experience five distinct stages of group development.
The stages are forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning (Robbins, 2009). Forming is the first stage in which the focus of the group is on the interpersonal among group members. Storming is the second stage and is one of inter-group conflict. Norming, as a third stage, is a stage in which close relationships emerge and the group displays cohesiveness. Performing is the fourth stage. It is a stage in which the group formation is entirely functional and accepted.
The adjourning stage, which is the last stage, only applies to temporary groups. It is a stage in which the group gets ready for its dismissal (Aquinas, 2006).
Arnold, K 2003, Teamwork Can Build A Better Bargain, Daily Press.
Aquinas, G. P 2006, Organisation Behaviour. Excel Books India.
Adonis ,J 2012, Group work: helpful or just monkey business? Sydney Morning Herald.
Chaneta. I 2013, Groups and Group Behavior: Journal of Comprehensive Research, 5, p 32.
Heathfield, M.S 2013, What Is a Team? <
Llopis, G, 2013, The Most Successful Leaders Do 15 Things Automatically, Every Day. Forbes Magazine
McIntyre, E, Halfhill,T and Heather, R 2000, Work groups: From the Hawthorne studies to work teams of the 1990s and beyond, Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4(1), p44-67.
Pranit K 2012, Organizational Behaviour, Gyan Publishing House
Robbins, P. S 2009, organizational behaviour in Southern Africa, 2nd edition. Pearson South Africa
Schneider, B 1987, The people make place . Personnel Psychology , 40:437-453.
Shapiro, W, 2014, Newport News braces for tough budget year, Daily Press, Retrieved on 31 January 2014 from,
Zhang, Z, 2011, Examining the relationships between top management team psychological characteristics, transformational leadership, and business unit performance, Handbook of top management research, 127-149.
Hwang, K, 2013, Confucian and Legalist Basis of Leadership and Business Ethics, In Handbook of the Philosophical Foundations of Business Ethics (pp. 1005-1026), Springer Netherlands.
Kiyatkin, L, 2011, Thought leadership on business and social issues, Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 2011(41), 83-102.
Carter, E, 2012, Whole Person Learning: Embedding Ethical Enterprise Leadership In Business Education, American Journal of Business Education (AJBE), 5(6), 677-692.
Storey, J, 2013, Leadership in organizations, Routledge.
Von Groddeck, V, 2011, Rethinking the Role of Value Communication in Business Corporations from a Sociological Perspective–Why Organisations Need Value-Based Semantics to Cope with Societal and Organisational Fuzziness, Journal of business ethics, 100(1), 69-84.
González, A, 2011, Systematic derivation of class diagrams from communication-oriented business process models, In Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling (pp. 246-260), Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Gripsrud, M, 2010, Face-to-face by travel or picture: the relationship between travelling and video communication in business settings, International Business Travel and the Global Economy, 217-238.
Laster, N, 2010, Looking across the divide: analyzing cross-disciplinary approaches for teaching business communication, Business Communication Quarterly, 73(3), 248-264.
Teel, D, 2014, Babcock shows grace, humor, humility in Virginia Tech introduction, Daily Press, Retrieved on 31 January 2014 from,< http://www.dailypress.com/sports/colleges/virginia-tech/dp-spt-teel-column-babcock-intro-20140130,0,7617969.column>.