The paper "Communication Management, Justifiable Use for Doublespeak" is a perfect example of a management assignment. Doublespeak refers to the intentional use of words to hide or distort meaning (Lutz 1984). Doublespeak is justifiable when it is used to depict an individual or an organization in a manner considered to be less unfavourable than when plain language is used. For instance, it can be used to convey humour when conversing with a person who has undergone an unfortunate incident. A case in point is when employees are told they have been “ downsized” to cut company expenses, which would be a euphemism for telling them they have been “ sacked” or “ dismissed. ” Again, in military scenarios, doublespeak may be justifiably used to refer to unfortunate incidents.
For instance, an incident of civilian deaths would be referred to as “ collateral damage” without mentioning death. However, doublespeak is also unjustifiable when used in situations that can distort communication and trigger confusion to the audience (Lutz nd). Indeed, when used intentionally to obscure or distort meaning in order to make an audience to be unable to predict consequences if direct language or effective communication is used in order to take advantage of their ignorance.
In the United States, President Obama has been accused of being a master of doubles-speak. For instance, rather than say they would be ‘ bombing Iran” Obama used the term ‘ serving the target” while the euphemism for ‘ war” became ‘ national confrontation. ’ Obama also adopted the term “ sensitivity training” to emphasise compulsory sessions for “ re-educating” individuals he deemed to be politically incorrect regarding certain social issues (Smith 2013). In other scenarios, when politicians use the term ‘ ethnic cleansing” to refer to systematic cleaning of a certain group of people instead of “ genocide, ’ it may trigger hate where one would think his ethnicity is targeted. Therefore, double-speak may be justifiable when used to pass a message without acting as a barrier to communication to the audience or considering to confuse the audience or render them ignorant. 2.
Find an article or listen to a presentation that uses signposts. Identify the signposts and explain how they help the audience follow the article or presentation. Signposts are intended to notify an audience of the main points or a change in ideas.
They also break a flow of presentation to allow members of an audience who may have undergone an attention slip to understand that their attention is needed. Additionally, they remind members of an audience of part of the conversation should e taken away from the entire communication, be treated with seriousness or acted upon. In brief, they consist of ‘ simple transitions’ that may be a simple phrase or a word that plainly highlight the key points or point an audience to the logical association between ideas. For instance, the excerpt below is from the article “ Korean Wave as a Tool for Korea's New Cultural Diplomacy" by Janga and Paik (2012).
In the excerpt below, several signposts can be identified (as highlighted below). They include “ On one hand” to highlight a priority and make a contrast, “ On the other hand” to also to highlight a priority and make a contrast, “ simply put” to point audience to the most important point, and “ however” to make a contrast.