The paper "Justice Reinvestment to Reducing Crime and Re-Offending" is a great example of a report on finance and accounting. Societies existing in the 21st century face a lot of challenges ranging from economical, political to social. The most challenging issue is how to effectively deal with lawbreakers and offenders. The existing penalty for any lawbreaker is imprisonment for a certain time-bound, and in extreme cases, some may be sentenced to a death penalty. The management of prisons varies in different countries meaning that there are variations in their activities, philosophies, physical conditions and regimes.
Their prisons differ also in characterization and classification ranging from rehabilitation centres to maximum security centres. The other difference is founded on the government ways of running and financing the prisons. The population of almost all the prisons in the world represent those individuals who originate from the lowest strata of society. The population represent every poor stratum within the country, but the proportion of each society may be different. The areas where the prisoners reside are characterized by poor sanitation, health problems, lack of basic needs and poor financial backgrounds.
Their presence in the prisons is based on the fact that the nature of their wanting conditions they are more likely to be involved in the criminal acts. This is because the only way they can make their ends meet is through crime. The law enforcers are fully operational in such areas. Therefore, it is of significance to set up centres which are a replacement of the existing systems of prisons so as to have a keen look at the problems affecting these areas.
The prison option can only be sought for those offenders who are dangerous, serious and persistent. The paper sets out to examine the existing comparison and distinction between justice reinvestment and the other approaches to reducing crime and re-offending. Justice Reinvestment Justice reinvestment is a term which originated from the United States, and the concept stands for a system whereby the money that is used for the imprisonment of the offenders are effectively and efficiently utilized in the improvement of such areas where crime prevalence is at an alarming rate. The goal is achieved through the establishment of initiatives that are community-based and are focused towards the eradication of such behaviours, which lure the community members to crime.
Beith, A 2010, Cutting Crime: Report, Together with Formal Minutes, London, The
Beith, A 2010, Crime reduction, London, The Stationery Office.
Cheks, S 2010, Reducing Re-offending Through Skills and Employment, New York,
Clear, T 2011, Community Justice, New York, Taylor & Francis.
Fabelo, A 2007, Justice reinvestment: a framework to improve effectiveness of justice policies,
Council of State Governments.
Goldson, B 2006, Youth, crime and justice: critical issues, New York, Pine Forge Press.
Hardie, H 2002, Partners Against Crime, Institute for Public Policy Research.
Koech, A 2007, Justice reinvestment: a new approach to crime and justice, International Centre
for Prison Studies.
Marsh, I 2004, Criminal justice: an introduction to philosophies, theories and practice, Sydney,
McDougall, C 2006, Reducing crime: the effectiveness of criminal justice interventions, London,
John Wiley and Sons.
McNeill, F 2007, Reducing reoffending: social work and community justice, Michigan,
University of Michigan.
Siegel, LJ 2008, Criminology, New York, Cengage Learning.