Essays on Concept of Corporate Social Responsibility Literature review

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper "Concept of Corporate Social Responsibility " is an outstanding example of a marketing literature review. The concept of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has gained much publicity in recent times. Besides being widely research, the business fraternity has increasingly recognized it as one of the key elements determining the competitiveness of any business; which if not taken into consideration may permanently affect its long-term viability. Of late, businesses are focusing on the responsibilities of a firm and the key question that arises is whether businesses should be left to concentrate only in areas of profit maximization or should also engage in activities that go beyond the economic role.

This study gives an insight into how modern businesses are currently undertaking corporate social activities not to respond to societal needs, but to gain a competitive advantage over their competitors. According to Freeman (1984), corporate social responsibility refers to a kind of corporate philanthropy that started in the late 1800 in, United States of America. Further, Collins (1993) defines the concept of corporate social responsibility as the policy and practice of firms’ social contributions that go beyond what it is obligated under the terms of its establishment to benefit the society at large.

In addition, Broberg, (1996) viewed CSR as to those actions by firms that go in line with societal expectations and values. Around the 1960s, the concept of CSR had developed further. Nonetheless, the companies, which had CSR programs, bore additional duties other than their legal obligations. Discussion Even though many organizations have embarked on corporate social initiatives, the concept is still not clearly understood, and many businesses are losing the focus on CSR.

For instance, in the case of Enron, social initiatives could not be accounted for. As such, despite initiating the social programs, the company lost focus and later abandoned them concentrating much on profit-oriented programs.

References

Barone, M.J., Miyazaki, A.D. & Taylor, K.A. (2000). The influence of cause-related marketing on consumer choice: does one good turn deserve another? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(5): 248–262.

Broberg, M.P. (1996). Corporate social responsibility in the European Communities – the Scandinavian viewpoint. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(6): 615–625.

Collins, M. (1993). Global corporate philanthropy – marketing beyond the call of the duty? European Journal of Marketing, 27(2): 46–58.

Enderle, G. & Tavis, A.L. (1998). A balanced concept of the firm and the measurement of its long-term planning and performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(11): 1129–1143.

Fombrun, C.J. & Shanley, M. (1990). What is in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2): 233–259.

Fombrun, C.J. (1996). Reputation, Realizing Value from the Corporate Image. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA:Pitman Publishing.

Hammond, S.A. & Slocum, J.W. (1996). The impact of prior firm financial performance on subsequent corporate reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(2):159–166.

Kay, J. (1993). Foundations of Corporate Success. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lerner, D.L. & Fryxell, E.G. (1988). An empirical study of the predictors of corporate social performance: a multi-dimensional analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 7 (14): 951–959.

Osterhus, L.T. (1997). Pro-social consumer influence strategies: when and how do they work? Journal of Marketing, 61 (2): 16–29.

Pava, M.L. (1998). The substance of Jewish business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(6): 603–617.

Ptacek, J.J. & Salazar, G. (1997). Enlightened self-interest: selling business on the benefits of

cause related marketing. Non-Profit World, 15(4): 9–15.

Sethi, S.P. (1977). Advocacy Advertising and Large Corporations. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

Smith, C. (1994). The new corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 72(3): 105–116.

Stanwick, A.P. & Stanwick, D.S. (1998). The determinants of corporate social performance: an empirical examination. American Business Review, 16(1): 86–93.

Szykman, R.L., Bloom, N.P. & Levy, S.A. (1997). A proposed model of the use of package claims and nutrition labels. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 16(2): 228–241.

Webb, J.D. & Mohr, L.A. (1998). A typology of customers’ responses to cause related marketing: from skeptics to socially concerned. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 17(2): 226–239.

Wood, J.D. (1991). Corporate social performance revised. Academy of Management Review, 16(4): 691–718.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us