The paper "Workforce Engagement - Approaches" is a good example of business coursework. Workforce engagement is easily understood as organization leaders and their employee’ s commitment level towards the organization mission, values and objectives (Abbas 2014, p. 1). As such, employee engagement has been perceived to be one of the best motivational factors that forecast the ability of an organization to achieve its major objective. Additionally, employee engagement is a behavior positioned by employees at work through the level of responsibility fulfillment, leadership relationship with employees and the leadership perspective in employee’ s performance level in the organization.
Almost all organization expects that employee engagement will have a benefit on the quality of the service and its employment contentment’ s (Nada 2016, p. 832) Managing people entails organization leaders managing staffs within organizations by mentoring employees through the best effective approach. In the process, the leader enables the employees to attain their potentiality while achieving the organization goals. As such, employee’ s workforce engagement is through motivation, organization ability in the handling of employee grievance while introducing new changes at the workplace (Gomathi 2014, p.
20). According to Kenexa Research Institute (KRI), findings indicated that the senior leadership team within the organization tends to determine the overall employee engagement level within an organization (Wiley 2013, p. 47). It can easily be argued that the leadership workforce engagement occurs in a two-way reciprocation in between the organization leaders and the organization employees. Contrarily, companies might encounter poor workforce engagement especially if the organization leadership has a poor working strategy. This retrospect paper seeks to discuss factors within leadership workforce engagement thus leadership in organizations policies, leadership in inspiration share vision, leadership in modelling the way, and enabling others to acts as managers as aspects affecting leadership workforce engagement.
The paper further identifies some of the approaches that can be applied to curb issues facing leadership workforce engagement. Some of the approaches considered are removal of compensation and benefits in organizations, managers making work meaningful, fostering strong organization management, conducive working environment, organization opportunity to grow and leadership focus on organization mission, vision and transparency. Lastly, the paper discussion is further analyzed into conclusive remarks Factors Leadership style Leadership is a key antecedent of employee workforce engagement.
Studies in leadership showcase that certain leadership characteristics have a co-relation in employee’ s workforce engagement constructs such as motivation, job satisfaction, work commitment, proactive character traits of employees and organizational citizenship behavior (Lieli 2013, p. 128). Additionally, further research pinpoints three leadership behaviors, thus employee development, consideration, and performance orientation having employee development and employee consideration labeled as the relationship-oriented style in workforce engagement while performance orientation is a task-oriented style in employee engagement (Ariani, 2014, p. 13). Basically, leadership behavior based on follower performance relating with the organization goals showcases higher levels of the employee’ s workforce engagement because the technique exhibits more relationship-related behavior between managers and employees (Xu 2014, p.
399). Organization Policies Organization policies are positioned by organization managers for effective workforce engagement. Formulated organization policies based on rules, regulations and framework defined by the organization top leadership tend to determine the level of employee workforce engagement (Vance 2015, p 23). The policies themes that tend to spearhead workforce engagement are based on the available opportunities within the organization, the organization demographics, worker’ s lifestyle, individual job profile and the appreciations either money or non-monetary.
Research identifies that organization policies that advocate that employee workforce engagement is motivated by the good package in salaries and motivation steeped, and insurance cover for the employees and family policies (Mehta 2014, p. 157).
Amah, E 2016, ‘Exemplary Leadership and Employee Engagement,’ International Journal of Managerial Studies and Research, vol. 4, no. 2, p. 16-18
Aon, 2013, ‘ Trends in Global Employee Engagement,’ Retrieved from
Ariani, D 2014, ‘Relationship Leadership, Employee Engagement, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior,’ International Journal of Business and Social Research, vol.4, no. 8, p.13
Abbas, A 2014, ‘Employee Engagement and Organizational Commitment,’ International Journal of Business, vol. 19, no.2, p. 1.
Bersin by Deloitte 2014, ‘New research reveals diversity & inclusion efforts well-intentioned, but lacking,’ Retrieved from
Coutu, D 2013, ‘Why Teams Don’t Work: An Interview with J. Richard Hackman,’ Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from <
Gomathi, S 2014, ‘A Study on Grievance Management in Improving Employee Performance in Pvt Enterprise,’ Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, vol. 5, no. 20, p. 20.
Lieli, S 2013, ‘The Effects of Organizational Culture and Leadership Style towards Employee Engagement and their Impact towards Employee Loyalty, ‘World Review of Business Research, vo. 2, no. 5, p. 128.
Mehta, M 2014, ‘Employee Retention and Commitment,’ International Journal of Advance Research in Computer Science and Management Studies, vo. 2, no. 2, p. 157.
Mendes, F 2014, ‘Positive Organization: The Role of Leader Behavior in Work Engagement and Retention,’ SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, vol. 37, no. 1, p. 13.
Nada, A 2016, ‘Competing through Employee Engagement: A Proposed Framework,’ International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, vo. 56, no. 6, p. 832.
New York Times 2014, ‘Silicon Valley’s Diversity Problem,’ Retrieved from:
Pan, X 2014, ‘Psychological Ownership Organizational Based Self-Esteem and Positive Organizational Behavior,’ Journal of Chinese Management Studies, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 127.
Sadiya, A 2016, ‘The Impacts of Supervisors Supports on Employees Engagement,’ International Journal of Research and Review, vo. 3, no. 3, p. 15.
Schor, J 2014, ‘The Overworked American: The Unexpected Decline of Leisure,’ New York: Basic Books, p.20.
Vance, R 2015, ‘Employee Engagement and Commitment,’ A Guide to Understanding, Measuring and Increasing Engagement in Organization,’ p. 23. SHRM Foundation. USA
Wiley, J 2013, ‘The Impact of Effective Leadership on Employee Engagement,’ Employment Relations Today, vol. 37, no. 2, pp.47.
Xu, J 2014, ‘How can Leaders Achieve High Employee Engagement?’ Journal of Leadership and Organization Development, vo. 32, no. 4, p.399.
Yarow, J 2014, ‘This is the internal grading system Google uses to grade its employees—and you should use it too,’ Business Insider. Retrieved from
Zeynep, T 2014, ‘The Good Jobs Strategy: How Smartest Companies Invests in Employees to Lower Costs and Boosts Profit,’. p. 60. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.