Essays on Corporate Boards that Create Value Assignment

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper "Corporate Boards that Create Value" is a wonderful example of a Management Assignment. Many people imagine the board of directors as smartly dressed men and women, who normally sit in posh offices always smiling in their dollar suits. This picture arises from annual company reports that feature such photographs. However, remarkably few people have the slightest idea of the responsibilities of the governing body. This report critically analyzes the responsibility, purpose, authority, and functioning of the governing board. The governing board consists of elected or appointed persons mandated with the running of an organization or company.

There are many names, which refer to the governing board such as the board of managers, directors, regents, trustees, visitors or in some cases just the board. Activities of a board depend on its powers/authority, responsibilities and duties given to it by the conferring authority (Richie 2007). The mandate of the board appears in the companies or organizations bylaws. These bylaws form the foundation of the board, its composition, mode of selection, time of selection and specify the time for meetings.

The board is subordinate to the full members’ council or the shareholders of a company. In any organization, the board constitutes the highest power in organization management. In institutions such as schools or colleges, the board is the highest governing body and its members mostly choose the board (Robert et al 2000). The basic duties of a governing board include governing the company. The board achieves this role by laying down policies, objectives, and visions of the organization. Secondly, the board selects, appoints support and reviews the conduct and function of the chief executive officer (CEO).

Thirdly, the board ensures the organization has enough financial resources to operate. Fourthly, the board supervises and approves the organization’ s annual budget. The board is also liable to the stakeholders for the performance of the organization (Carter 2008). Further, the board evaluates and pays dividends, split shares, approve financial statements and recommend or discourage mergers or acquisitions. In addition, the board sets the remunerations, salaries, and wages of the employees and management. Legally, the responsibilities and duties of the governing board differ with the environment of an organization and the jurisdiction of operation (Carter 2007).

The primary responsibility of the board is to ensure proper returns on shareholders’ equity. However, in the current global market, many directors consider the protection of employees as their first priority. In such a situation, employee care comes first while the profitability and needs of shareholders come second (Kennon 2013). Structure of the governing board The board consists of directors elected by shareholders for the specified year terms. Many organizations operate on a rotating system which ensures only a few directors can be reelected in any given period.

This ensures competency and accountability and reduces the chances of a complete hostile takeover through a change in the board. Most directors have an interest in the organization, work in the upper management of the organization, or operate independently from the organization, but the organization recognizes them for their business skills (Kennon 2013). Various organizations have a different number of directors. Some companies have more than ten directors such as Walt Disney that have sixteen, elected for a one-year term. Others may have less than ten directors such as Tiffany’ s with only eight directors.

In the USA, half of the directors must be independent. Therefore, they should have no association with the directors or the stakeholders of the organization (Solomon 2011).

References

List of References

Blumberg, P 1973. ‘Reflections on Proposals for Corporate Reform Through Change in the

Composition of the Board of Directors: “Special Interest” or “Public” Directors’ 53 Boston University Law Review 547.

Bowen, W. G 2008. The board book: an insider's guide for directors and trustees.

W.W. Norton & Co, New York

Cai, J, Garner, J, &Walkling, R 2010. "Shareholder Access to the Boardroom: A Survey of

Recent Evidence.". Journal of Applied Finance 20 (2): 15–26.

Carter, M 2008. "Overview of Roles and Responsibilities of Corporate Board of Directors".

Free Management Library. Authenticity Consulting, LLC, Minneapolis, Minnesota

Carver, J, 2002. Corporate boards that create value: governing company performance from the

Boardroom. Jossey-Bass, Hoboken, New Jersey

Charan, R 2005. Boards that deliver: advancing corporate governance from compliance to

Competitive advantage. Jossey-Bass, Hoboken, New Jersey

Craig S, & Lattman, P 2008. Evaluating the board of directors. Viewed on

Jan 7, 2013 From .asp#ixzz27Kekd83e

Doyle, J 2009. The Elements of Effective Board Governance. Community College Press,

Washington, DC.

Evans, Bruce R. (2010). Inc 5000.com. Six Steps to Building an Effective Board. Viewed on

Jan 7 2013 From http://www.inc.com/inc5000/articles/20070401/evans.html

Fosberg, R. H n.d. “Effective Outside Directors”. Journal of Applied Business and

Economics. Viewed on Jan 7th 2013 From

< http://www.na-businesspress.com/fosbergweb.pdf >

Griffin, S 2006. Company Law: Fundamental Principles. Pearson Longman, Harlow, England

Harvard business review on corporate governance, 2000. Harvard Business School Press.

Hopt, K., Kanda, H., Roe, M., Wymeersch, E, & Prigge, S 1998. 'The German Two-Tier Board:

Experience, Theories, Reforms' Comparative Corporate Governance: The State of

the Art and Emerging Research. Clarendon Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Hymowitz, C. 2003. “How to be a good Director”. The Wall Street Journal. Viewed on Jan 7th

2013 From

Kennon, J 2013. About.com Guide. The Board of Directors : Responsibility, Role and

Structure. Viewed on Jan 7th 2013 From

Kiel, G. C & Gavin, N. J 2005. Evaluating Boards and Directors.

Corporate Governance: An International Review 13(5):pp. 613-631. Available at http://eprints.qut.edu.au/4935/1/4935.pdf

Murray, A. S 2007. Revolt in the boardroom: the new rules of power in corporate America.

HarperCollins, New York

Richie, D. A 2007. Effective Relationships: A study of Board of Directors in Selected Oregon

Nonprofit Organizations. ProQuest, Ann Arbor, MI.

Robert III, Henry M., Evans, W.J, Honemann D.H, & Balch T.J 2000-10-01. Robert's Rules of

Order Newly Revised. Da Capo Press, Cambridge, MA

Shivdasani, A & Yermack, D. 1999. “CEO Involvement in Selection of New Board

Members: An Empirical Analysis”. The Journal of Finance. Vol. LIV, NO.5.

Solomon, J 2011. Corporate Governance and Accountability 3rd ED. John Wiley and Sons,

Hoboken, New Jersey.

Tutelman, C.J & Hause, L.D 2008. The Balance Point: New Ways Business Owners Can Use

Boards. Famille Press.

Wood, R. E. 2004. Compensation Committee Structure, Function and Best Practices. Available

at http://www.klgates.com/files/Publication/f44a6446-4d3a-4847-a157-319c05d9667b/Presentation/PublicationAttachment/3900b2fd-2183-44e8-82d7-4ibd4366fof6/

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us