The paper "Management to Layoff Employees at Utilities Co. " is a perfect example of a case study on human resources. The Utilities Co. case highlights the manner in which the changing external environment and the economy moving into a downward recession have been affected. Businesses all around the world have to continuously face the changing and evolving external environment and have to mold the manner they work so that the best results can be achieved. Recession is an economic condition that results in job losses and companies looking for alternatives through which they are able to reduce their cost.
Utilities Co. presents an example in this direction where due to recessionary conditions the management had to decide slashing off 120 jobs. The management previously looked towards voluntary redundancies but when it didn’ t work the company had to resort towards slashing jobs. This resulted in resistance from all quarters including the unions and created a situation where the human resource manager Maree had to resign. This report thereby looks into the issues that Utilities Co. was presented with and looks towards identifying the manner better decisions could have been taken and the manner in which it could have been communicated so that a basic framework regarding the manner in which the task was executed and the manner in which it could have been executed looked into. Issues in Utilities Co Utilities Co.
faces a major problem which is to deal with the changing business environment which has made the economy move into recession. This has increased the cost burden and has made the management look towards taking decision where they look towards laying off the employees so that the organization is able to ensure cost reduction techniques and survive in the difficult times. Utilities Co.
has a mix of staff where certain departments have more staff than required and a certain department has less staff than required. This has resulted in a problem for the management as certain sections of the employees are showing efficiency while dealing with things whereas the other section is looking just to work and not looking towards innovation to improve the quality of work. This has made the management look towards laying off the underperforming employees so that the organization is able to cut off costs (Tang, 2003).
Deresky, H. 2011. International Management: Managing Across Borders and Cultures (7th Edition) Pearson
Daiyun, Y. 2008. Some Characteristics of Culture and Its Possible Contributions to the World. Pecking University, China
Franco, G. 2009. Training and development in an era of downsizing. Journal of Management Research, 9 (1), pp. 37
Frambach, R., Prabhu, J. and Verhallen, T. 2003. The influence of business strategy on new product development: the role of market orientation. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 20 (4), pp. 143-153
Fizel, J. 1999. Does efficiency matters in managers. Journal of Management, 25 (4), pp. 567-585
Heathfield, S. 2010. What managers do differently, Management Success, about.com, The New York Times Company
Hale, J. 2003. Performance based management: What managers should do to get result, 2nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons Inc, UK
Jay, J. 2010. Lead & Motivate: not just your team but yourself too. Super Vision, 71 (6), pp.11
Ralston, D., Hallinger, P., Egri, C. & Naothinsuhk, S. 2005. The effects of culture on work place strategy of upward influence, University of Bangkok, Elsevier Inc
Tang, C. 2003. The spiritual Values of Working Culture. Tokyo, Cheng Chung Book Co, chapter 16
Yukl, G. 2009. Managerial Leadership. Journal of Management, 15 (2), pp. 251-289
Yamamura, J., Birk, C. & Cossitt, B. 2010. Attracting & Retaining Talent: The importance of first impression. The CPA Journal, 80 (4), pp. 58