The paper 'Critics on Business Ethics, Singh and Lathams Article" is a good example of business coursework. Critics on business ethics have mentioned that business appals have assumed epidemic dimensions and those companies that were once successful have been toppled by their leaders’ transgressions. Besides, these critics raise the captivating subject of how inventive companies turn out to have frauds as leaders. Some leadership scholars believe that contemporary society is anguished by the plague of pitiable leadership in the economy. A comprehension of corporate psychopaths’ assists to counter the query of how inventive companies turn out to have impostors as leaders.
In this regard, the report seeks to critically analyse Singh (2008) and Latham (2013) articles, with the aim of comparing the two scholars’ perception of leadership, leaders’ role in transforming business performance, as well as how leaders with no ethics affect the global business. A Brief Summary of Singh and Latham Work Singh (2008) study seeks to prove how scandals in the corporate world have taken epidemic dimensions. Across the world, even famous companies have been knocked down from their high platforms by the leaders’ transgressions, and for this reason, Singh seeks to establish how competent organisation end up having ‘ impostors’ as leaders.
Singh believes that the answer possibly lies in the mislaid highlighting on certain behaviour correlated with leadership. Furthermore, he believes that true leadership needs a sense of balance in the midst of three rudimentary requisites: Integrity, Expertise and Energy. Singh study proves how these three rudimentary requisites upon synchronization can let loose the latent potential in every company. The study realizes that leadership is out of these three interrelating components, and that Integrity makes sure that the company is in the right course, whereby it is run towards collective good instead of self-centred motives.
In the study, it is realized that leaders must not be chosen based on the apparent qualities since this has blinded many companies in the past (Singh, 2008, p. 733). Therefore, the selected leaders must at first pass the Integrity test; thus, Singh recommends a ‘ decision tree’ as well as a ‘ checklist’ to assist in the process of selection. On the other hand, Latham (2013) describes a framework for leading the transformation to performance excellence (LTPE).
Basically, Latham’ s LTPE framework has thirty-five concepts structured into five groups: change forces as well as facilitators’ leadership behaviours, leadership approaches, organizational culture, and individual leader characteristics. Latham study examines two of the five groups comprehensively: change forces and facilitators as well as leadership approaches. For this reason, the rudiments of all entity factors are explained in the company with supporting information, correlations to other factors are described, and connections to the theory are acknowledged (Latham, 2013, p. 12). Whereas the leadership approaches create a system for strategic leadership, a number of extra leadership theories are recognized as well as talked about together with transactional along with transformational leadership, servant leadership, and spiritual leadership.
According to Latham (2013, p. 12), from 1980s quality crisis, companies have experienced unparalleled transformation in the areas of international business rivalry, talent competition, fiscal turmoil, and insecurity, together with environmental and communal challenges, compelling them to incessantly change their plans as well as redesign their techniques for attaining sustainable achievement.
Alas, R., Tafel, K. & Tuulik, K., 2007. Leadership style during transition in society: case of Estonia. Problems and perspectives in management, vol. 1,no. 1, pp.50-60.
Boddy, C.R., 2011. Corporate Psychopaths, Bullying and Unfair Supervision in the Workplace. Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 100, no. 3, pp.367-79.
Boddy, C.R., 2011. The corporate psychopaths theory of the global financial crisis. Journal of business ethics, vol. 102,no. 2, pp.255-59.
Boddy, C.R., Ladyshewsky, R.K. & Galvin, P., 2010. The Influence of Corporate Psychopaths on Corporate Social Responsibility and Organizational Commitment to Employees. Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 97, no. 1, pp.1-19.
Ketola, T., 2006. From CR-psychopaths to responsibile corporations: waking up the inner Sleeping Beauty of companies. Corporate Social - Responsibility and Environmental Management, vol. 13, no. 2, pp.98-107.
Latham, J.R., 2013. A Framework for Leading the Transformation to Performance Excellence Part I: CEO Perspectives on Forces, Facilitators, and Strategic Leadership Systems. Quality Management Journal, vol. 20, no. 2, pp.12-33.
Latham, J.R., 2013. A Framework for Leading the Transformation to Performance Excellence Part II: CEO Perspectives on Leadership Behaviors, Individual Leader Characteristics, and Organizational Culture. The Quality Management Journal, vol. 20, no. 3, pp.19-40.
Pardue, A.D., Robinson, M.B. & Arrigo, B.A.P.D., 2013. Psychopathy and Corporate Crime: A Preliminary Examination, Part 2. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, vol. 13, no. 2, pp.145-69.
Singh, J., 2008. Impostors Masquerading as Leaders: Can the Contagion be Contained? Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 82, pp.733–45.
Sui, Y., Wang, H., Yue, Y.-N. & Luthans, F., 2012. The effect of transformational leadership on follower performance and satisfaction: The mediating role of psychological capital and the moderating role of procedural justice. Acta Psychologica Sinica, vol. 44, no. 9, pp.1217-30.
Tipu, S.A.A., Ryan, J.C. & Fantazy, K.A., 2012. Transformational leadership in Pakistan: An examination of the relationship of transformational leadership to organizational culture and innovation propensity. Journal of Management & Organization, vol. 18, no. 4, pp.461-80.
Tourish, D., Craig, R. & Amernic, J., 2010. Transformational Leadership Education and Agency Perspectives in Business School Pedagogy: A Marriage of Inconvenience? British Journal of Management, vol. 21, no. s1, pp.s40–59.
Weeks, D.F., 2007. Commitment to Performance Excellence in Ontario. Public Manager, vol. 35, no. 4, pp.22-27.
Winchester, S., 2012. Public sociology and the economic crisis. Work, Employment and Society, vol. 26, no. 6, pp.1031-35.