The paper "Elements of Management" is an outstanding example of a management case study. In the recent past, management has emerged as a crucial element in attaining the goals of any particular organization. A significant number of the organizations that have been successful in the global scene often attribute their success to the sound and effect management policies they embrace. Some managers of various organizations make tremendous achievements while others fail to realize the organization’ s goals. Many studies have argued that the success of a given organization often depends on the skills of the staff members as well as the available resources to finance the activities of the organization.
This argument often fails to explain the differences in the performance of organizations with similar characteristics and resources. One can argue that the much-celebrated success of some organizations is often attributed to characters of the leaders of that particular group. If an organization is led by people who are hardworking and focused, then the success rate of that organization is often impressive compared to other organizations. However, various management theories have been formulated, and a critical analysis of these theories reveals the importance of embracing crucial and efficient, management elements to the success of an organization.
Even though these management theories seem to be structured in a unique way, they all tend to agree on particular issues that significantly contribute to the success of the management policy embraced by the leaders of any organization (DUDLEY, 2008). The four critical management elements that are explained by various management theories are the planning area, the organizing area, the leadership area and the controlling area. The theories of management argue that if the leaders if a particular organization understands and employs these elements, then the chances of achieving the goals of that organization will increase significantly.
The leadership management element Various scholars have explained the element of the leading element in management. These theories form the foundation of the origin of the theory. Principal among these theories is the Contingency theory by Fred Fiedler. The contingency theory espouses that any organization needs to embrace sound leadership practices to succeed. In particular, the tenets of this theory argues that effective leadership often depends on the goals, procedures, and the ability of a leader to reward good performance.
The lack of the three aspects ultimately leads to leadership failure in any organization. Fiedler’ s contingency theory has put much emphasis on the leader’ s psychological disposition and his or her personality (FINN, 1982). Moreover, the theory argues that the ability for one to lead often depends on the task involved and the extent to which that person can exert control over the group of people he or she is leading. Max Weber’ s theory of leadership also gives insight into the leadership element in managing an organization.
The theory elaborates on how a leader of an organization should achieve the objective by exercising his or her authority in the organization. Further, the theory classifies leaders into three distinct categories namely; traditional leader, bureaucratic leader, and the charismatic leader. Weber clearly explains a model where a combination of the three types of leaders can be effected in an organization to achieve its objectives satisfactorily (PRICE, 2007). These two theories set a solid foundation for understanding the elements of leadership and its essence in management.