Essays on Pros and Cons of a Bureaucratic Approach towards Managing Contemporary Organisations Case Study

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper 'Pros and Cons of a Bureaucratic Approach towards Managing Contemporary Organisations" is a good example of a management case study. Bureaucratic approach to management has been in existence from time immemorial. It draws roots from the reign of the first rulers of the world such as Julius Caesar and Genghis Khan. The quest to find an easy way of governing mega organisations and expansive territories drove these leaders to design regulations and rules alongside hierarchies whose replication would be less challenging. In modern days, this leadership technique is still synonymous with enormous and multinational corporations.

Spahr (2015) describes bureaucratic management as a formal organisational system that operates on definite levels of hierarchy and roles with a view to inducing seamless operability and facilitating efficiency and effectiveness. The bureaucratic approach to management specifies organisational structure as a continuous and definite hierarchy where each subsequent level entirely depends on the control of the management level it succeeds. Besides, every position and department within the particular hierarchy exists in a right of its own with the jobholders having no specified rights to any given position.

Weber (2015) adds that the responsibilities and obligations at the individual levels have a clear delineation, thus, each level operates around its own sphere of competence. There are several theories that define bureaucratic management with the most dominant one being Max Weber’ s bureaucratic management theory, which details the specific tenets of bureaucratic management. It is noteworthy that while the approach has been in use from the beginning of time, it is not entirely beneficial. Bureaucratic management has certain cons, which are speculated by the theory of bureaucratic dysfunction.

Among the top two organisations that embody the pros and cons of bureaucratic management include the modern U. S. Army division of the military and General Motors respectively. Bureaucratic management improves efficiency in large organisations, but the operation of contemporary organisations is more than just efficiency.

Bibliography

Bradt, G 2015, ‘Banish General Motors-Like Bureaucracy and Embrace Hierarchy’, Forbes, 14 January.

Cloke, K and Goldsmith, J 2002, The End of Management and the Rise of Organizational Democracy, Jossey-Bass, New York, p. 27.

George, P 2014, ‘GM’s Scathing Internal Inquiry Is a Tale of Bureaucratic Incompetence’, Jalopnik, 6 May.

George, R 2009, Contemporary Sociological Theory and Its Classical Roots: The Basics, McGraw-Hill, New York, p. 38–42.

Hamel, G 2007, The Future of Management, Harvard Business School Press, Harvard, p. 13.

Howell, JP 2012, Snapshots of Great Leadership, Taylor and Francis, London, p. 16–17.

Martin, D 2010, ‘Gates Criticizes Bloated Military Bureaucracy’, CBS News, 9 May, viewed 4 November 2016, http://www.cbsnews.com/news/gates-criticizes-bloated-military-bureaucracy/

McLean, J 2005, ‘Management Techniques and Theories’, Manager, The British Journal of Administrative Management, p. 17.

Niall, F 2013, The Cash Nexus: Money and Politics in Modern History, 1700-2000, Penguin, UK.

Powers, R 2016, ‘U.S Army Military Organization from Squad to Corps: a guide to each building block in the modern army’, The Balance, 8 September, viewed 4 November 2016, https://www.thebalance.com/u-s-army-military-organization-from-squad-to-corps-4053660

Ridderstrale, J 2001, ‘Business Moves Beyond Bureaucracy’, in Pickford, J. (ed.) Financial Times Mastering Management 2.0, Financial Times Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ p. 217–20.

Ronald, NJ and Gary, DL 1994, The Federal Civil Service System and the Problem of Bureaucracy, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, p. 1–11.

Schneider, SC. and Barsoux, J 2003, Managing Across Cultures, Financial Times Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

Schultz, DP and Schultz, SE 2010, Psychology and work today: an introduction to industrial and organizational psychology, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, p. 171.

Spahr, P 2015, ‘What is Bureaucratic Leadership? How Rules Can Guide People’, St. Thomas University Online, 30 October, viewed 4 November 2016, http://online.stu.edu/bureaucratic-leadership/

Stern, S 2001, ‘Guru Guide’, Management Today, 2 October, p. 87.

Stewart, RC, Martin, H and Harro, H 2011, Managing Modernity: Beyond Bureaucracy? Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Watson, TJ 2002, Organizing and Managing Work, Financial Times Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, p. 254.

Weber, M (ed) 2015, Weber’s Rationalism and Modern Society: New translations on Politics, Bureaucracy, and Social Stratification, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.

Wren, D and Bedeian, A 2009, The Emergence of the Management Process and Organization Theory: The Evolution of Management Thought, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us