The paper "How to Address the Old School Management" is a good example of management coursework. All business heavily relies on the output of more than one person. Whether discussing massive workforce or a small team of employees, the success of each team has a positive impact on organization performance. Today, companies are widely focusing on the output of collective groups of individuals as opposed to individuality. Effective teamwork within an organization translates to reduced costs, human assets and increased efficiencies (Scarnati, 2001). With increased globalization and technological advancement, companies are finding new ways in obtaining resourcing which include staffing.
Each organization is finding new ways in which they can be able to ensure that there is the fair and effective distribution of resources so as to enhance company performance which in turn transform the company’ s profit margin. Today, the organization has adopted approaches and methods to be used by employers in significantly resourcing their companies in a manner that will enable them to meets their key goals (Scarnati, 2001). Identification of key issues In these two scenarios that are the old and new school management, there are key issues in team development and their effectiveness in enhancing company performance.
These two organizations operate in different ways whereby each way has an impact on organization performance. In the old school management, the company organization has adopted a divide and rule approach whereby team are set against each other in an effort to obtain resources including staffing. This approach poses some challenges as the team members can result in creating an organizational culture that is not a concern with other employees well being.
Like the name suggest this approach divide teams against one another in their quest to fight for scarce resources within the organization. Another challenge emerged when different team leaders feel that resourcing was being made in unfair and unjust method where the CEO favors one team. The CEO is involved in controlling staff level and therefore there is a likelihood that he becomes biased in the allocation of resources to the different teams in an organization. On the other hand, in the new school as opposed to what is being practised in the old school management, the CEO has adopted a market-based approach to resourcing.
Here, both staffing and resourcing largely depend on the needs exhibited by the business team as opposed to being given on the team through the use of subjective criteria. This policy is considered to be advantageous in the sense that the organization management allowed teams to develop their growth plan in regard to the available resources. Both staff development and training involved a proposal being assessed by a group of team leaders with a key focus on what is best for the organization.
It is quite evident that these two approaches have a different impact on the company performance and therefore, CEO needs to ensure that they adopt the approach that will result to increased performance which translates to increased profit margin. Analysis Of the two theories In these theories, each has an implication to the company performance and company profitability. Teamwork within any given organization is important since it enables duties to be performed effectively and timely. Based on the dived and rule approach is setting organizational resourcing, this theory provides a challenging environment for the organization.
In the dived and rule approach, team members are involved in the competition for existing resources and therefore there is a likelihood of potential conflict (Oliver, 2001). Team leaders are constantly engaged in conflicting views and therefore the realization of company goals and objective is not met. The old school management theory creates a working environment which is controlling a manipulative and thus to meet organizational goals become very difficult. The market-based resourcing is important in today globalised world as it allows team members to work with the available resources based on the prioritized objectives that need to be met.
Effective team members approach the idea of knowledge and skill exchange where members learn from one another (Luca and Tarricone, 2001). The market-based approach enables ideas to create in innovativeness and thus organization are in a position to develop a defensible competitive edge marking companies’ market leaders in a given sector. The new management theory adopts a bottom-up management approach which allows its employees to develop a sense of belonging and therefore work towards achieving the set goals.
New school management adopts the use of technology which enhances their output and thus increased organizational margins. Evidently, to be a market leader in today competitive global business environment, it is important that they re-strategize their management to adopt the new school theory (Luca and Oliver, 2001).
Fisher, S. G., Hunter, T. A., & Macrosson, W. D. K. (1997). Team or group? Managers' perceptions of the differences. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 12(4), 232-242.
Flynn, G. (1997). How do you know if your work teams work? Workforce, 76 (5), May p. 7
Johnson, P. R., Heimann, V. L., & O'Neill, K. (2000). The wolf pack: team dynamics for the 21st century. Journal of Workplace Learning: Employee Counselling Today, 12(4), 159-164.
Kets De Vries, M.F.R. (1999) High-performance teams: Lessons from the Pygmies. Organisational Dynamics,Winter, p. 66-77.
Leoni, R. et al,(2001). New work practices in Italy. Adoption and performance effects , University of Bergamo, Italy
Lorenz, E., Arundel, A., Lundvall, B.Å. and Valeyre, A., (2006)The organisation of work and innovative performance: A comparison of the EU15 , Paper prepared for the 11th International Schumpeter Society Conference, Sophia Antipolis, 21-24 June 2006.
Luca, J., & Oliver, R. (2001). Developing Generic Skills through On-line Courses. Paper presented at the Ed- Media 2001, Tampere, Finland.
Luca, J., & Tarricone, P. (2001). Does emotional intelligence affect successful teamwork? Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education at the ASCILITE, p. 367 – 376, Melbourne: University of Melbourne.
Oliver, R. (2001). Developing e-learning environments that support knowledge construction in higher education. Presented at the 2nd International We-B Conference, p. 407 – 416. Perth, Western Australia.
Scarnati, J. T. (2001). On becoming a team player. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 7(1/2), 5-10.