Essays on Different Management Styles in terms of Gender in Saudi Arabia Research Proposal

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper "Different Management Styles in terms of Gender in Saudi Arabia" is an outstanding example of a management research proposal. The proposed research intends to deal with the gender-specific differences in managerial behavior and envisages to does that by evaluating the extent to which these gender-specific differences originate from the gender stereotypes. The research would not be about investigating the opinions and behavior of individual managers but would investigate enterprise-level evidence from Saudi Arabia. Research Rationale It is a fact that men and women differ across their social behavior. Moreover, there have been differences in the ways, our society wants them to exhibit their behavior in the various socio-economic group.

Further, the behavioral differences of these two also do not always match in across various contexts. An organization’ s managerial setting is no exception to that. Various studies highlighting these behavioral differences in managerial context have been conducted. However, initially, these studies were largely influenced by feminist scholars, and have found meager differences in the managerial behavior of male and female managers (Henning and Jardim, 1978). Some research while evaluating the stereotypical differences in gender roles has revealed that either because of nature or nurture, the social behavior of women is comparatively more caring oriented than that of men.

It has also been indicated that women have comparatively more verbal and non-verbal communication abilities along with a comprehensive approach towards decision-making (Lippa, 2002). Applying these stereotypes to managerial behavior it can be contested that women are better at managing with a “ transformational” approach, however, with a high degree of mentorship for the workforce, they manage (Bass, 1974). Another dimension which can be highlighted here is that the studies that have been carrying out are mostly revealing the individual traits rather than evaluating the enterprise-wide behavioral orientation based on gender differences.

Thus there exists a gap wherein the proposed research would be throwing some light. Like any developing economy, Saudi Arabia has evolved as an important economic element of global trade. Especially on the account of the fact that it possesses almost a quarter of all the known oil reserves in the world (Ray, 2005). As the managerial level interactions of global managers increase vis-à -vis Saudi culture, an understanding of cultural similarities and differences can facilitate cross-cultural communications and boundary spanning.

In line with the global trend, Saudi Arabia to has seen a steady increase in the proportion of women at management. As such, the proposed research put forwards a unique prospect to pursue research on culturally derived Saudi managerial behaviors and to help understand, evaluate and then formalize a gender-based strategy for management development for cross-cultural interaction of Saudi Arabia with rest of the globe. Moreover, the proposed research would be more meaningful from the perspective that most of the studies that have been undertaken in this perspective have not used the context of Arab culture (Al-Jafary & HoUingsworth, 1983). Research Questions Managerial behavior in itself is a complex parameter to evaluate.

However, we can break it down into various dimensions which can then be evaluated to arrive at some understanding. One widespread dimension that can be used to analyze the gender-based differences in managerial styles is the difference in orientation of their leadership style. This would be evaluated to know the difference in the behavior that men and women managers use to influence the actions of their employees.


1. Referencing

Al-Jafary, A. and A. HoUingsworth, 1983, "An Exploratory Study of Management Practices in the Saudi Arabian Gulf Region, "Journal of International Business Studies Fall: 142-152.

Assad, S. 2002. "Sociological Analysis of the Administrative System in Saudi Arabia: In Search of a Culturally Compatible Model." International Journal of Commerce and Management 12: 51-81.

Bass, B.M. (1974): “An Introduction to Theories and Models of Leadership” in R.M. Stogdill (Ed.): Handbook of Leadership (pp. 37-55). New York: Free Press.

Brenner, O.C., J. Tomkiewicz and V.E.Schein (1989): “The Relationship between Sex Role Stereotypes and Requisite Management Characteristics Revisited,” Academy of Management Journal, 32, pp.662-669.

Butler, D., & Geis, F. (1990). Nonverbal affect responses to male and female leaders: Implications for leadership evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 48–59.

Carli, L. L. (1990). Gender, language and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 59, 941-951.

Chapman, J. B. (1975). Comparison of Male and female leadership styles. Academy of Management Journal, 18, 645-650.

Code of Human Research Ethics, The British Psychological Society, 2010

Copeland, C. L., Driskell, J. E., & Salas, E. (1995). Gender and reactions to dominance. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 53-68.

Deaux, K., & Major, M. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 369-389.

Denscombe, Martin (1999) The Good Research Guide for Small-Scale Social Research Projects, Open University Press

Denscombe, Martin (1998) The Good Research Guide for small-scale social research projects. Boston. Allyn & Bacon.

Donnell, S. M., & Hall, J. (1980). Men and women managers: A significant case of no significant difference. Organizational Dynamics, Spring, 60-77.

Downs, C.W., & Adrian, A.D. (2004). Assessing organizational communication. New York: Guilford Press.

Eagly, A.H. and B.T. Johnson (1990): “Gender and Leadership Style: A Meta-Analysis,” Psychological Bulletin, 108, pp. 233-256.

Eagly, A.H. and M.C. Johannesen-Schmidt (2001): “The leadership Styles of Women and Men,” Journal of Social Issues, 57, pp.781-797.

Eagly, A.H., S.J. Karau and M.G. Makhijani (1995): “Gender and the Effectiveness of Leaders: A Meta-Analysis, ” Psychological Bulletin, 117, pp. 125-145

Hearn, J. and W. Parkin (1987): Sex at Work: the power and Paradox of Organization Sexuality. Brighton: Weathsheaf Books.

Henning, M. and A.Jardim (1978): The Managerial Woman. London: Marion Boyars.

Hirschheim, R.. (1985). “Information Systems Epistemology: an Historical Perspective”, In Mumford, et al. 1985 . Research Methods in Information Systems: proceedings of the 1st IFIP 8.2 Conference, Manchester, Elsevier Science Publisher, North-Holland.

Holmes, J., & Marra, M. (2004). Relational practice in the workplace: Women’s talk or gendered discourse? Language in Society, 33, 377-398.

Kabacoff, R.I. (1998): Gender Differences in Organizational Leadership, Portland: Management Research Group (available at, retrieved on 29th March 2012, 2300 hrs).

Kanter, R. M. (1977): Men and women of the Corporation. New York: Basic

Korabik, K. (1982). Sex-role orientation and leadership style. International Journal of Women's Studies, 5, 328-336.

Lazear, E.P. and S. Rosen (1990): “Male-Female Wage Differentials in Job Ladders,” Journal of Labor Economics, vol 8(1), S106- S123.

Lippa, R.A. (2002): Gender, Nature and Nurture. Mahwah: Erlbaum

Loden, M. (1985): Feminine Leadership, or How to succeed in Business without Being One of the Boys. New York: Times Books.

Madhi, S. and A. Barrientos. 2005. "Saudisation and Employment in Saudi Arabia." Career Development International 8: 70-78

Powell, G.N., D.A. Butterfield and J.D. Parent (2002): “Gender and Managerial Stereotypes: Have the Times Changed?” Journal of Management, vol 28, 177-193.

Powell, G.N and L.M. Graves (2003): Women and Men in Management (3rd Edition). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Ray, R. 2005. "Extent of Saudi Reserves Debated." Knight Ridder Tribune BusinessNews November 1:1.

Rosener, J. B. (1990): “Ways Women Lead” Harvard Business Review, 68/6, pp.119- 125.

Schein, V.E. (1973): “The Relationship between Sex Role Stereotypes and Requisite Management Characteristics,” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol 57, 95-100.

Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 32, 1492-1512

Wajcman, J. (1996): “Desperately Seeking Differences: Is Management Style Gendered,” British Journal of Industrial Relations, vol 34(3), pp.333-349.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us