The paper “ Discrimination against Women at Workplace” is a provoking example of the literature review on human resources. Issues of women discrimination either in private organizations or government offices have taken center stage, particularly after the second half of the twentieth century. Over the years, activists have expressed their concerns that women have been treated unjustly in as far as political, economic social, and cultural issues are concerned. This has clearly drawn the interest of scholars and other stakeholders alike who have embarked on researches in a bid to evaluate the truth in such claims.
The popular view is that women are somewhat underrepresented when it comes to issues relating to different fields be it in reference to employability, hiring, promotion, and professional qualification, in various sectors (Gregory 2002, 13). The common view among managerial behaviorists and sociologists is that the workplace remains a noteworthy epicenter in the reproduction and perpetuation of disparities. Numerous studies have been carried out to examine gender disparities as they characterize themselves in the workplace environment. In essence, Discrimination against women in the workplace has been recognized as a wicked problem that not only affects both the public and the private sector.
Governments have made purposeful attempts to eradicate the various forms of discrimination. A good case in point is provided by the passage of legislation that supports affirmative action. Within the background of the United States, Australian, among other countries, discrimination against women has previously been identified as a key problem, particularly considering the very diverse nature of the populace. Significant strides in as far as minimizing discrimination have been made since the 1950s (Johnson 2007, 38).
However, complete success has remained indefinable and discrimination against women in the workplace remains rampant all through the country. Literature ReviewThe post-world War Two era has experienced a marked rise in the number of females joining the labor market. Nevertheless, there is little proof to suggest that increased involvement has been accompanied by a decrease in gender-based discrimination at the workplace. Certainly, the available body of evidence portrays gender-based discrimination as the most widespread type of workplace inequality.
Burstein, P 1994, Equal employment opportunity: labor market discrimination and
public policy, Aldine Transaction, Edison.
Cooklin, A Rowe, H & Fisher, J 2007, Workplace discrimination continues for women, retrieved
March 24, 2010
Cotter, D Hermsen, J & Vanneman, R 2000, The American people census 2000:
gender inequality at work, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
Gregory, R 2002, Women and Workplace Discrimination: Overcoming Barriers to
Gender Equality, Rutgers University Press, New Jersey.
Hurst, C 2007, Social inequality, Pearson Education, Inc, Boston.
Mano-Negrin, R 2004, Gender inequality and employment policy in the public sector:
a cross-national comparison of women managers’ wages in five industrialized countries. Administration and Society, vol. 36, no.2, pp.454-477.
Mueller, C 1987, The Politics of the Gender Gap: The Social Construction of
Political Influence, SAGE Publications, University of Michigan
Johnson, B 2007, Understanding racial inequality in the American workplace: the
persistence of the principle-implementation gap and its relationship to social dominance orientation and modern racism, Columbia University press, New York
Takala, T 2007, Charismatic Leadership and ethics from Gender Perspective, vol. 12, no.2, pp.
Vianello, M and Renata, S 1990, Gender Inequality: A Comparative Study of
Discrimination and Participation, Newbury Park, SAGE Publications, California
Williams, C 2004, Inequality in the toy store, Qualitative Sociology, vol. 27, no.4, pp. 461-486.
Wellington, S 2008, Women and men have equal aspirations in the workplace,
retrieved March 24, 2010
White, M 2008, Women: an Untapped Talent, retrieved March 24, 2010