The paper "Leadership Contributing to Sustainable Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility " is a good example of management coursework. This essay will focus on how Practices of leadership contribute to the management of sustainable values and corporate social responsibility in the post-bureaucratic era. According to Knights & Willmott (2006), leadership is an integral part of each and every company and where leadership is effective; the company performance in terms of ethics, success, responsibility and sustainability is usually awesome. Morgan, (2006) continues and affirms that leadership determines whether the workers and the employees, in general, will be motivated which is a paramount aspect for the growth in every business.
The essay will demonstrate how leadership and ethics usually go hand in hand and the role of leaders in spearhead decisions that are based on ethical behaviors (Parker, 2002). A leader is an important figure in the company and he or she determines whether ethics formulated will be followed or not (Bakan, 2004). For example, the decisions made by the leader will impact every worker and associate of the company. For example, a utilitarian approach affirms that happiness should be the ultimate goal if at all the action has to be moral.
Therefore, when making a decision, the leader must take into account such consideration, and that counts all the reasons why leadership is important (Browning, 2007). The term leadership is defined as the ability to guide, encourage the business to realize the goals and objectives set (Roberts et al, 2005). Change in bureaucracy is more humanity and it usually focuses on the performance of the employee and his or her effectiveness. Effective leadership will culminate in success and better performance of any given company.
Effectiveness in leadership is reflected through the distribution of work according to the potential of the employee and ultimately expanding the business through enhancing the relationship between the leader and the follower (Stubbs & Cocklin, 2008). Therefore, it is paramount to consider the leadership style as it will impact the entire company. Bureaucracy is referred to as a model of business which is based on rules hierarchy, impersonality and ultimately the division of labor. It has been the dominant form of business over approximately one century.
However, the style suffers from challenges such as lack of effective employee motivation, producer-focus inertia among other challenges. As a result, post-bureaucracy has recently been proposed as the new organizational design and it is more suited to today’ s business environment. Post – bureaucracy is mainly based on empowerment, trust, personal treatment and ultimately shared social responsibility. However, post bureaucracy has its own problems such as loss of control and the unfairness risk. The problems and models derived from the major mainstream of thinking. The thinking is mainly concerned with the narrow views of efficiency that is guided by the search for control and performance (Wenger & Snyder, 2000). The critical methods usually provide a more radical analysis of bureaucracy and the post-bureaucracy.
From one end bureaucracy appear to be dehumanizing while the post bureaucracy on the other end is perceived to be an extension of control. Both of them are usually criticized since they seek efficiency from particular people and especially those with power and at the same time neglecting the other people who are in that business.
However, post bureaucracy enhances social responsibility and sustainable ethics in the long run. Post- bureaucracy usually follows the strict rules and at the same time allowing new methodologies and ideas to help the business and business to grow (Browning, B.W. 2007).
Bakan, N. (2004) The Corporation, Amazon Publishers. London
Browning, B.(2007), ‘Leadership in desperate times: An analysis of endurance: Shackle ton’s incredible voyage through the leans of leadership theory’, Advances in developing Human Resources, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 183-98.
Fulop, L. and Linstead, S. (2004) Management: A Critical Text, Melbourne:
Macmillan Publishers. New York City.
Gold, S., Hahn, R. & Seuring, S. 2013, 'Sustainable supply chain management in “base of the pyramid” food projects—a path to triple bottom line approaches for multinationals?', International Business Review, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 784-99.
Klein, N. 2000, 'The branding of learning', in, No logo: Taking aim at the brand bullies, Picador, New York City
Knights, D. and Willmott, H. (2006) Introducing Organizational Behaviour and
Management, London: Thompson.
KwarciÅ„ski, T. (2012). Ethics of Business or Ethics for Business? Two Models for Paliwal, M. (2006). Business ethics. New Delhi: New Age International
Morgan, G. (2006) Images of Organization, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. London.
Parker, M. (2002) Against Management, Oxford. Cambridge University.
Roberts, L., Dutton, J., Spreitzer, G., Heaphy, E. & Quinn, R. 2005, 'Composing the reflected best-self portrait: Building pathways for becoming extraordinary in work organizations', Academy of Management Review, vol. 30, no. 4, p. 712
Stubbs, W. & Cocklin, C. 2008, 'Conceptualizing a “sustainability
Business model”', Organization & Environment, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 103-27
Thompson, P. and McHugh, P. (2002) Work Organizations: A Critical Introduction,
3rd edition, Basingstoke and London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Teaching Business Ethics. Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, 3(116), 42-49.
Wenger, E.C. & Snyder, W.M. 2000, 'Communities of practice: The
Organizational frontier', Harvard Business Review, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 139-46