Essays on The Purpose of Performance Appraisals, Edwards Deming Business Management Expert Literature review

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper "The Purpose of Performance Appraisals, Edwards Deming Business Management Expert" is a perfect example of a business literature review.   Performance appraisal is a management concept that has been heavily misunderstood and used in the wrong way. Ranking of employees using supervisors views on the subjects and is prone to bias. It sets employees against one another while employees tend to forget their core duty in employment and concentrate on impressing their seniors to obtain favorable ranking. However, when performance appraisal is approached in the right manner, the results are impressive both on individual employee productivity and overall performance of the organization. Introduction Edwards Deming is a renowned business management expert.

In many forums, he has shocked his fellow management experts in denouncing employee performance appraisals terming them as detrimental. On the other hand, there are those adamant in the belief that employee performance appraisal is beneficial to organizations management. The mainstream literature seems to be in support of performance appraisals eager to record how effective the procedure is. However, the modern approaches to performance appraisal do not display the characteristics that Deming seems to be against.

This paper will thus seek to show that the traditional approach in a performance appraisal that heavily relies on the numerical ranking of employees, has a negative impact and at the same time show that modern approaches to performance appraisals lead to better performance of employees and organizations through a review of existing relevant literature on the subject.   Deming's view of performance appraisals may be said to be overrated. However, there exist a number of other business executives and management experts and authors who tend to be in congruence with his views.

Falcone and Sachs (2007) write that performance appraisals have a common misconception in that their sole purpose in the workplace is to “ inform employees how their performance has been rated. ” Berger (2008) concurs with this misconception and says that a contemporary performance appraisal operates on the basis of absolute comparison by assessing how employees perform as compared to set goals and objectives. According to the same authors, (Falcone & Sachs, 2007), a performance appraisal is a work session between an employer or senior staff with the junior staff aimed at making plans for the future.

Berger (2008) also says that if managers could only impart performance appraisals on their employees in the right way then, the procedure would be sufficient enough to deliver feedback, manage organizational talent and play a significant role in making good compensation and rewards decisions. However, traditional managers, more so where there is a vertical organizational chart and making of decisions and flow of authority is from the top downwards, are not ready to lose their “ respect” by interacting with their subjects.

Berger (2008) says that organizations with an organic structure have higher success rates in implementing performance appraisals. She (Berger, 2008) says that the backbone of performance appraisals is excellent communication between the senior management and other employees of the organization. She dismisses the traditional way of appraisal where managers “ lecture” employees without hearing them out.

References

Abdullah, H., Rose, R., Salleh, A., and Kumar, N. (2007) Measuring and Managing Performance

Improvement in the Manufacturing Sector European Journal of Social Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp 157-166

Berger, D. (2008) The Compensation Handbook, edition 5, (New York: McGraw Hill)

Brown, M. and Heywood, J. (2007) “Performance Appraisal Systems: Determinants and Change,”

British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol 43, No 4 pp. 659–679

Falcone, P and Sachs, R. (2007) Productive performance appraisals edition 2, (New York: AMACOM)

Gilley, W., Eggland, A. and Gilley, M. (2002). Principles of Human Resource Development, 2nd edition

(Cambridge, Perseus Publishing)

Heslin, P., Latham, G. and VandeWalle, D. “The Effect of Implicit Person Theory on Performance

Appraisals,” Journal of applied psychology 2005, Vol. 90, No. 5, 842– 856

Kuvaas, B. (2006) “Performance appraisal satisfaction and employee outcomes: mediating and

moderating roles of work motivation,” The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1466-4399, Volume 17, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 504 – 522

Milkovich, T. and Newman, M. (2002). Compensation 7th edition. (Boston: McGraw-Hill Irwin).

Patton, Wendy and McMahon, Mary (2006) The Systems Theory Framework Of Career

Development And Counseling: Connecting Theory And Practice. International Journal for the

Advancement of Counseling Vol. 28, No. 2 :pp. 153-166

Scholtes, P. (2004). The leader's handbook: making things happen, getting things done (New York:

McGraw-Hill)

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us