Essays on Cost-Benefit Analysis within the Sector of Criminal Justice Report

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper "Cost-Benefit Analysis within the Sector of Criminal Justice" is a great example of a report on macro and microeconomics. The aim of this paper is to deliver research that illustrates major challenges to undertaking a cost-benefit analysis within the sector of criminal justice. In addition, the cost-benefit herein referred to as CBA will be examined to establish what it does tell the readers about the fiscal efficiency of reduction of situational crime. Summary: Cost-benefit analysis is applied progressively more in crime cutback and criminal justice assessment, however, it remains a frustrating practice that is straightforward to dismiss and criticize (Bowers, Johnson & Hirschfield AFG 2004).

People are asking whether to include the intangible cost of crime? Should the national or local cost approximations be applied? Are criminal and saved law enforcement costs a benefit of crime prevented? In hypothesis, such questions can result in an infuriatingly large, probably infinite, benefit-cost proportion outcome numbers. Introduction The cost-benefit analysis also known as (CBA) is a practice applied in many fields of public policy surveys comprising economics, engineering, and health. The technique is becoming more and more in criminal justice studies and crime prevention, and it is progressively prominent in policy formulation.

The Home Office directed that all assessment for its topical multiyear countrywide Crime Reduction Initiative has to integrate cost-benefit analysis. David Farrington and Brandon Welsh did not long ago review the CBA of a situational transgression prevention program, programs for correctional treatment and programs for child development. The reviews established a meager standardization in either measurement or identification of the items cost. A handful of evaluations comprise approximations of the intangible crime cost.

Certain evaluations, for instance the one of Kirkholt burglary undertaking comprise the benefit from ‘ saved’ law enforcement labor which is not used investigating burglaries which were prevented, though a lot of crime prevention assessments keep out such items cost, (it is important to note that the Kirkholt venture, the benefits still considerably overshadow cost even if the law enforcement time is excluded.

References

Association of British Insurers 1998, Insurance statistics yearbook 1988-1998, London.

Audit Commission 1999.Safety in numbers, promoting community safety, Audit commission publications.

Bowers, KJ, Johnson, SD & Hirschfield, AFG2004, “Closing off opportunities for crime: an evaluation of alley-gating”, European journal on criminal policy and research, 10:285-308.

Bowles, R2008, “Measuring the costs of drug misuse: a note”, University of York.

Brand, S & Price, R2000, “The economic and social costs of crime”, Home office research study 217, London.

Cohen, MA2000, “Measuring the costs and benefits of crime and justice”, Measurement and analysis of crime, Washington, DC, National Institute of Justice.

Dessetor, K2011, “Cost-benefit analysis and its application to crime and prevention and criminal justice system”, Australian Institute of Criminology.

“Economic and social costs of crime against individuals and households”, Home office.

Godfrey, C, Eaton, G, McDougall, C & Culyer, A2003, “Economic and social costs of drug misuse”, Home office research study, 249.

Gramlich, E1990, A guide to benefit cost analysis, New York, Prentice Hall.

I&DeA 2009, Valuing health: Developing a business case for health improvement, Matrix evidence ltd.

Legg, D & Powell, J2000, “Measuring inputs: Guidance for evaluation”, Crime reduction programme guidance note 3, London, Home Office.

Restorative solutions 2010, “Restorative practice case study: Peter’s story”, available at www.restorativesolutions.org.uk/page.

Sivarajasingam, V, Wells, JP, Moore, S & Shepherd, JP2008, Violence in England and wales: An accident and emergency perspective.

Walby, S2004, Women and equality unit, University of Leeds.

Welsh & Farrington 2000, “Correctional intervention programs and cost benefit analysis”, Criminal justice and behavior.

Whiston, R & Hawkes, N2009, “Violence and the invisible sex”, Category archives: domestic violence, available at www.wordpress.com/domestic-violence.

Pawson, R. and Tilley, N. (1997) Realistic evaluation. London: Sage.

The Matrix Knowledge Group (2008) Dedicated Drug Court Pilots: A Process Report , London: Ministry of Justice

Roman, J. (2004) ‘Can Cost-Benefit Analysis Answer Criminal Justice Policy Questions, And If So, How?’ Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice Vol.20 p.257

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us