Essays on Effectiveness of the United Kingdom Emergency Management System Case Study

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper “ Effectiveness of the United Kingdom Emergency Management System” is an exciting example of the case study on management. The United Kingdom emergency management system has faced significant reforms and challenges in the last two decades due to increasing disasters (United Nations 2008). The possibility of facing disasters such as the 2005 London Bombing raises the issue of the effectiveness of the UK emergency planning arrangements in managing huge disasters and mass casualties. This paper explores key organizations involved in disaster management, types of agency management structures, elements of potential conflicts, and recommendations. Disasters in the UK and emergency organizationsDisasters in the United Kingdom range from natural to manmade disasters.

The geographical location, climate change, sea-level rise, and rainfall intensity makes it technically and economically impossible to prevent all-natural disasters such as flooding, severe storms, as well as gales, heavy snow, heat waves, drought and fires (Sahin, Kapucu, and Unlu, 2008). The 2007 floods, for instance, destroyed more than 55,000 properties, killed 13 people, left 350,000 people with no water access (Pitt, 2008). Today, about 5 million people are living in flood risk areas in England and Wales.

Inland regions experience severe storms and guts. Also, heat waves, droughts, global warming present challenges to UK residents. Catastrophic transportation fatalities, air crash accidents, raid road, and sea transportation fatalities call for effective disaster management. In the last decade, riots, and protests incidents result in significant impacts and damages. Emergency recovery involves the process of rebuilding, restoring, and rehabilitating the community after a disaster (United Nations 2008). Recovery involves humanitarian, economic, infrastructure, and environmental aspects that should be rebuilt and restored. Emergency organisations begin the recovery process with the emergency response and continue for days or even months to ensure effective and holistic recovery.

Establishing the recovery process as soon as possible minimizes the damage at the scene of the disaster.


Arbuthnot, K 2005, multi-Agency Incident Command in the UK: International Workshop on Emergency Response and Rescue, Taipei, Republic of China.

Beheshtifar, M 2013, interpersonal conflict, a substantial factor to organisational failure. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Vol. 3, No. 5, ISSN: 2222-6990

BritishRedCross 2016, what we do, retrieved 18th June 2016,


Cabinet Office 2009a, Civil Contingencies Act, retrieved June 14, 2016, from Cabinet Office


Cabinet Office 2009b, List of Lead Government Departments' Responsibilities, retrieved June 14, 2016, from Cabinet Office:

Cabinet Office 2005, central Government Arrangements for Responding to an Emergency. Retrieved April 10, 2009, from Cabinet Office UK:

Cabinet Office 2009d, Management and Co-ordination of Local Operations, retrieved June 14, 2016, from Cabinet Office:

Cabinet Office 2009e, management and co-ordination of local operations, retrieved June 14, 2016, from Cabinet Office:

Cabinet Office 2008, The Role of Lead Government Departments in Planning for and Managing Crises, retrieved June 10, 2016, from Cabinet Office:>.

Civil Contingencies Secretariat 2009b, introduction to the Civil Contingencies Secretariat, retrieved June 14, 2016, from Cabinet Office: .

Civil Contingencies Secretariat 2009a, the Lead Government Department and its role – Guidance and Best Practice, retrieved June 14, 2016, from Cabinet Office: .

HM Government 2008, fire and rescue manual, incident command, Vol 2, information & publishing solutions

Moore, T 2008, disaster and emergency management systems, British Standards Institution

O'Brien, G, & Read, P 2005, Future UK emergency management: new wine, old skin?", Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, Vol. 14 Iss: 3, pp.353 – 361

Parker, D., & Hadmer, J 1992, hazard Management and Emergency Planning: Perspectives on Britain. Earthscan Publications Ltd.

Rahim, M 2001, managing conflict in organizations, 3rd edn, ISBN 1–56720–262–4

Sahin, B., Kapucu, N., & Unlu, A 2008, perspectives on Crisis Management in European Union Countries: United Kingdom, Spain and Germany. European Journal of Economic and Political Studies, 1 (1), 19-45.

United Nations 2008, Disaster Preparedness for effective Response, UN/ISDR & UN/OCHA

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us