Essays on Employment Relations at Motoco Case Study

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper 'Employment Relations at Motoco' is a great example of a Management Case Study. Globalization is one of the greatest things that have happened in the recent past. In particular, globalization has opened up business opportunities to large companies that are currently able to explore new business opportunities in the international market to ensure competitiveness and success (Wilkinson 1996, p. 421). Motoco is a classical example of an American multinational company that has operations in six different countries. The company deals with the manufacture and sale of lighting and signaling components to automakers.

It recently acquired a South Korean company based in Soul as part of its growth strategy. However, According to the case, Motoco wants to introduce its management policies in South Korea by adopting the Motoco Performance Management System, which it believes has been key to its success in the U. S. and other locations. However, before adopting the MPMS system in South Korea, there are certain benefits and drawbacks, as well as institutional and cultural constraints that might affect the effective implementation of the system at its subsidiary.

This report will begin by examining the potential benefits and risks of implementing the MPMS system in the Soul subsidiary and proceed to highlight the institutional and cultural arrangements that might affect the effective implementation of the MPMS system in the South Korean subsidiary. The report will also provide the strategic options available for Motoco in implementing the MPMS system and recommend the best option to adopt under the circumstances. Potential Benefits of implementing the MPMS system 
The first main benefit that Motoco would derive from the implementation of MPMS is the achievement of greater results.

The performance of a company depends largely on the contribution of every individual employee in a company. However, not all employees usually put in the efforts that can contribute to the achievement of greater results. It is for this reason that the implementation of MPMS would be of immense benefit to Motoco since MPMS ensures that workers understand the value of their efforts in the achievement of organizational objectives and goals (Jwijati and Bititci 2010, p. 425). Consequently, this results in greater productivity of each employee, thus organizational success.

References

Bititci, U., Garengo, P., Dörfler, V., & Nudurupati, S 2011, “Performance measurement: challenges for tomorrow.” International Journal of Management Reviews, pp. 1-12.

Bourne, M 2005, “Researching performance measurement system implementation: The dynamics of success and failure.” Production Planning & Control vol. 2, pp. 101-113.

Bourne, M., Neely, A., Platts, K., & Mills, J. 2002. “The success and failure of performance measurement initiatives: Perceptions of participating managers. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 1288-1310. DOI: 10.1108/01443570210450329

Dastmalchian, L. 2000, “The interplay between organizational and national cultures: A compariosn of organizational practices in Canada and Southe Korea using the Competing Values Framework. International Journal of Human Resources Management vol. 11, pp. 388–413.

Davis, S., & Albright, T 2004, “An investigation of the effect of Balanced Scorecard implementation on financial performance. Management Accounting Research vol. 15, pp. 135–153.

De Waal, A 2003, “Behavioral factors important for the successful implementation and use of performance management systems.” Management Decision vol. 41, pp. 688–697.

Groeschl, S 2003, “Cultural implications for the appraisal process, Cross Cultural Management.” An International Journal, Vol. 10 Issue: 1, pp.67-79.

Higgs, M 1996, “Overcoming the problems of cultural differences to establish success for international management team: Team performance management.” An International Journal vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 36- 43.

Jwijati, I. M., & Bititci, U. S 2010, “Exploring the impact of national culture on performance measurement.” IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol. 44 pp 425-432.

Lebas, M. J 1995, “Performance measurement and performance management.” International Journal of Production Economics vol. 41, pp. 23-35.

Rajendran, K 2015, Challenges in implementing a performance management system, viewed 3 October 2015 https://erm-academy.org/publication/risk-management-article/challenges-implementing-performance-management-system

Reddy, A 2011, Cultural dimensions & impact on performance management. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, vol.1, Issue 6, pp. 300-311.

Watson, T. J 1997, “Human resource management, industrial relations and theory-standing back and starting again. New Zealand Journal of Industrial Relations, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 7-21.

Wilkinson, B 1996, “Culture, institutions and business in East Asia.” Organisation Studies, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 421-447.

Yip, G. S 1992, Total global strategy. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us